Investing in updating: how do conclusions change when Cochrane systematic reviews are updated?

scientific article

Investing in updating: how do conclusions change when Cochrane systematic reviews are updated? is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P6179Dimensions Publication ID1044653087
P356DOI10.1186/1471-2288-5-33
P932PMC publication ID1274326
P698PubMed publication ID16225692
P5875ResearchGate publication ID7540058

P50authorSteve McDonaldQ37372831
Joanne E. McKenzieQ47188116
Simon D. FrenchQ50746403
Sally E. GreenQ55545418
P2860cites workTime to publication for results of clinical trialsQ24245587
Identifying null meta-analyses that are ripe for updatingQ24804098
Reporting, updating, and correcting systematic reviews of the effects of health careQ28239949
Systematic Reviews: Reporting, updating, and correcting systematic reviews of the effects of health careQ29038091
Publishing protocols of systematic reviews: comparing what was done to what was plannedQ31064822
Interval estimation for the difference between independent proportions: comparison of eleven methodsQ56475155
P433issue1
P407language of work or nameEnglishQ1860
P921main subjectsystematic reviewQ1504425
P304page(s)33
P577publication date2005-10-14
P13046publication type of scholarly worksystematic reviewQ1504425
P1433published inBMC Medical Research MethodologyQ15752152
P1476titleInvesting in updating: how do conclusions change when Cochrane systematic reviews are updated?
P478volume5

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q24288705A comparison of statistical methods for identifying out-of-date systematic reviews
Q36368781A large-scale assessment of temporal trends in meta-analyses using systematic review reports from the Cochrane Library.
Q37404586A systematic review of conflicting meta-analyses in orthopaedic surgery
Q38601574Considerations from the risk of bias perspective for updating Cochrane reviews.
Q38054286Coverage of mental health and substance misuse topics in the Cochrane review system.
Q37853715Decisions to update comparative drug effectiveness reviews vary based on type of new evidence
Q35225199Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 8. Synthesis and presentation of evidence
Q50350210Living network meta-analysis compared with pairwise meta-analysis in comparative effectiveness research: empirical study.
Q33827180Modeling the "minimally invasive surgery effect" in total joint replacement
Q35541306Motivating authors to update systematic reviews: practical strategies from a behavioural science perspective
Q24652193Patient characteristics affecting the prognosis of total hip and knee joint arthroplasty: a systematic review
Q28084782Scoping review to identify potential non-antimicrobial interventions to mitigate antimicrobial resistance in commensal enteric bacteria in North American cattle production systems
Q38260148Systematic reviews in medical education: a practical approach: AMEE guide 94.
Q36424958Systematic reviews: when is an update an update?
Q24570593The application of knowledge synthesis methods in agri-food public health: recent advancements, challenges and opportunities
Q26830612The modified Ottawa method to establish the update need of a systematic review: glass-ionomer versus resin sealants for caries prevention
Q35958170The quality of research synthesis in surgery: the case of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer
Q38232803Time relevance, citation of reporting guidelines, and breadth of literature search in systematic reviews in orthodontics
Q33991600Time to update and quantitative changes in the results of cochrane pregnancy and childbirth reviews
Q59330304Time-to-update of systematic reviews relative to the availability of new evidence
Q37998650Two methods provide similar signals for the need to update systematic reviews
Q37975045Updating clinical practice recommendations: is it worthwhile and when?
Q24243317When and how to update systematic reviews

Search more.