systematic review | Q1504425 |
review article | Q7318358 |
scholarly article | Q13442814 |
P50 | author | Charlotte Overgaard | Q55507378 |
Anne-Cathrine Skriver-Møller | Q57291612 | ||
Mia Lund Madsen | Q57291619 | ||
Mette Østergaard Poulsen | Q57291628 | ||
P2860 | cites work | Position in the second stage of labour for women without epidural anaesthesia | Q24197880 |
Perineal techniques during the second stage of labour for reducing perineal trauma | Q24234498 | ||
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration | Q27860581 | ||
Anal sphincter rupture during delivery: philosophy of science and clinical practice | Q30428973 | ||
Preventing perineal trauma during childbirth: a systematic review | Q30845208 | ||
Incidence of and risk factors for perineal trauma: a prospective observational study | Q34622490 | ||
Incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries after training to protect the perineum: cohort study | Q36370320 | ||
Third degree obstetric anal sphincter tears: risk factors and outcome of primary repair | Q36884881 | ||
Obstetric anal sphincter injury: incidence, risk factors, and management | Q37063943 | ||
Outcomes and follow-up after obstetric anal sphincter injuries | Q38083564 | ||
Severe perineal trauma is rising, but let us not overreact | Q38273767 | ||
Hands-poised technique: The future technique for perineal management of second stage of labour? A modified systematic literature review. | Q38281760 | ||
Dyspareunia and childbirth: a prospective cohort study | Q41553069 | ||
Reducing perineal trauma: implications of flexion and extension of the fetal head during birth | Q41725366 | ||
Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injury after a successful multicentre interventional programme | Q43406542 | ||
A multicenter interventional program to reduce the incidence of anal sphincter tears | Q44117558 | ||
Effects of perineal trauma on postpartum sexual function | Q44305027 | ||
Changing incidence of anal sphincter tears in four Nordic countries through the last decades | Q44792432 | ||
How long is too long: Does a prolonged second stage of labor in nulliparous women affect maternal and neonatal outcomes? | Q46225701 | ||
Anal sphincter tears: prospective study of obstetric risk factors. | Q51391202 | ||
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. | Q51811363 | ||
The well-built clinical question: a key to evidence-based decisions | Q55063853 | ||
The Hawthorne effect: A reconsideration of the methodological artifact | Q56287142 | ||
Relationship of episiotomy to perineal trauma and morbidity, sexual dysfunction, and pelvic floor relaxation | Q63616150 | ||
Frequency of anal sphincter rupture at delivery in Sweden and Finland--result of difference in manual help to the baby's head | Q77669365 | ||
The role of maternal age and episiotomy in the risk of anal sphincter tears during childbirth | Q80603972 | ||
Decreasing the incidence of anal sphincter tears during delivery | Q81192633 | ||
The Ritgen maneuver: another sacred cow questioned | Q81724481 | ||
Use of manual techniques for perineal support in Norwegian maternity departments | Q82794741 | ||
Vacuum-assisted deliveries and the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injuries-a retrospective register-based study in Finland | Q84771369 | ||
Are obstetric anal sphincter ruptures preventable?-- large and consistent rupture rate variations between the Nordic countries and between delivery units in Norway | Q87407341 | ||
P275 | copyright license | Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial | Q6936496 |
P433 | issue | 9 | |
P407 | language of work or name | English | Q1860 |
P921 | main subject | Finland | Q33 |
perineum | Q105499 | ||
episiotomy | Q1137446 | ||
fecal incontinence | Q1147182 | ||
anal canal | Q2465231 | ||
laceration | Q4391416 | ||
obstetric labor complication | Q7075540 | ||
P5008 | on focus list of Wikimedia project | ScienceSource | Q55439927 |
P304 | page(s) | e008346 | |
P577 | publication date | 2015-09-14 | |
P1433 | published in | BMJ Open | Q17003470 |
P1476 | title | Does the Finnish intervention prevent obstetric anal sphincter injuries? A systematic review of the literature | |
P478 | volume | 5 |
Q56523837 | A qualitative exploration of techniques used by expert midwives to preserve the perineum intact |
Q37663924 | Midwives' Management during the Second Stage of Labor in Relation to Second-Degree Tears-An Experimental Study. |
Q91752980 | Modified Ritgen Maneuver in Perineal Protection - Sixty-Year Experience |
Q40845336 | Prevalence of anal incontinence during pregnancy and 1 year after delivery in a cohort of primiparous women and a control group of nulliparous women |
Q90065312 | Regional variations in childbirth interventions and their correlations with adverse outcomes, birthplace and care provider: A nationwide explorative study |
Q38691807 | Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASI) at a tertiary centre in south India |
Q41712114 | Risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury increases with maternal age irrespective of parity: a population-based register study |
Q90181716 | The effects of a severe perineal trauma prevention program in an Australian tertiary hospital: An observational study |
Search more.