Does the Finnish intervention prevent obstetric anal sphincter injuries? A systematic review of the literature

scientific article

Does the Finnish intervention prevent obstetric anal sphincter injuries? A systematic review of the literature is …
instance of (P31):
systematic reviewQ1504425
review articleQ7318358
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1136/BMJOPEN-2015-008346
P932PMC publication ID4577972
P698PubMed publication ID26369797
P5875ResearchGate publication ID282036754

P50authorCharlotte OvergaardQ55507378
Anne-Cathrine Skriver-MøllerQ57291612
Mia Lund MadsenQ57291619
Mette Østergaard PoulsenQ57291628
P2860cites workPosition in the second stage of labour for women without epidural anaesthesiaQ24197880
Perineal techniques during the second stage of labour for reducing perineal traumaQ24234498
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaborationQ27860581
Anal sphincter rupture during delivery: philosophy of science and clinical practiceQ30428973
Preventing perineal trauma during childbirth: a systematic reviewQ30845208
Incidence of and risk factors for perineal trauma: a prospective observational studyQ34622490
Incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries after training to protect the perineum: cohort studyQ36370320
Third degree obstetric anal sphincter tears: risk factors and outcome of primary repairQ36884881
Obstetric anal sphincter injury: incidence, risk factors, and managementQ37063943
Outcomes and follow-up after obstetric anal sphincter injuriesQ38083564
Severe perineal trauma is rising, but let us not overreactQ38273767
Hands-poised technique: The future technique for perineal management of second stage of labour? A modified systematic literature review.Q38281760
Dyspareunia and childbirth: a prospective cohort studyQ41553069
Reducing perineal trauma: implications of flexion and extension of the fetal head during birthQ41725366
Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injury after a successful multicentre interventional programmeQ43406542
A multicenter interventional program to reduce the incidence of anal sphincter tearsQ44117558
Effects of perineal trauma on postpartum sexual functionQ44305027
Changing incidence of anal sphincter tears in four Nordic countries through the last decadesQ44792432
How long is too long: Does a prolonged second stage of labor in nulliparous women affect maternal and neonatal outcomes?Q46225701
Anal sphincter tears: prospective study of obstetric risk factors.Q51391202
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.Q51811363
The well-built clinical question: a key to evidence-based decisionsQ55063853
The Hawthorne effect: A reconsideration of the methodological artifactQ56287142
Relationship of episiotomy to perineal trauma and morbidity, sexual dysfunction, and pelvic floor relaxationQ63616150
Frequency of anal sphincter rupture at delivery in Sweden and Finland--result of difference in manual help to the baby's headQ77669365
The role of maternal age and episiotomy in the risk of anal sphincter tears during childbirthQ80603972
Decreasing the incidence of anal sphincter tears during deliveryQ81192633
The Ritgen maneuver: another sacred cow questionedQ81724481
Use of manual techniques for perineal support in Norwegian maternity departmentsQ82794741
Vacuum-assisted deliveries and the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injuries-a retrospective register-based study in FinlandQ84771369
Are obstetric anal sphincter ruptures preventable?-- large and consistent rupture rate variations between the Nordic countries and between delivery units in NorwayQ87407341
P275copyright licenseCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercialQ6936496
P433issue9
P407language of work or nameEnglishQ1860
P921main subjectFinlandQ33
perineumQ105499
episiotomyQ1137446
fecal incontinenceQ1147182
anal canalQ2465231
lacerationQ4391416
obstetric labor complicationQ7075540
P5008on focus list of Wikimedia projectScienceSourceQ55439927
P304page(s)e008346
P577publication date2015-09-14
P1433published inBMJ OpenQ17003470
P1476titleDoes the Finnish intervention prevent obstetric anal sphincter injuries? A systematic review of the literature
P478volume5

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q56523837A qualitative exploration of techniques used by expert midwives to preserve the perineum intact
Q37663924Midwives' Management during the Second Stage of Labor in Relation to Second-Degree Tears-An Experimental Study.
Q91752980Modified Ritgen Maneuver in Perineal Protection - Sixty-Year Experience
Q40845336Prevalence of anal incontinence during pregnancy and 1 year after delivery in a cohort of primiparous women and a control group of nulliparous women
Q90065312Regional variations in childbirth interventions and their correlations with adverse outcomes, birthplace and care provider: A nationwide explorative study
Q38691807Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASI) at a tertiary centre in south India
Q41712114Risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury increases with maternal age irrespective of parity: a population-based register study
Q90181716The effects of a severe perineal trauma prevention program in an Australian tertiary hospital: An observational study

Search more.