Video-Assisted versus Open Lobectomy in Patients with Compromised Lung Function: A Literature Review and Meta-Analysis

scientific article

Video-Assisted versus Open Lobectomy in Patients with Compromised Lung Function: A Literature Review and Meta-Analysis is …
instance of (P31):
meta-analysisQ815382
scholarly articleQ13442814
systematic reviewQ1504425
review articleQ7318358

External links are
P819ADS bibcode2015PLoSO..1024512Z
P356DOI10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0124512
P932PMC publication ID4493021
P698PubMed publication ID26146827

P2093author name stringRuoyu Zhang
Mark K. Ferguson
P2860cites workVideo-assisted thoracic surgery versus open lobectomy for lung cancer: a secondary analysis of data from the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0030 randomized clinical trialQ33532940
Thoracoscopic lobectomy has increasing benefit in patients with poor pulmonary function: a Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database analysisQ33873825
Randomized trial of lobectomy versus limited resection for T1 N0 non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer Study GroupQ34721402
Lobectomy by video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) versus thoracotomy for lung cancer.Q34990617
Pulmonary function tests do not predict pulmonary complications after thoracoscopic lobectomyQ35143115
Video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer in patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseQ37167097
Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and nonrandomized trials on safety and efficacy of video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer.Q37415870
American College of Chest Physicians and Society of Thoracic Surgeons consensus statement for evaluation and management for high-risk patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer.Q38064774
Treatment of stage I and II non-small cell lung cancer: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelinesQ38104632
A meta-analysis of unmatched and matched patients comparing video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy and conventional open lobectomyQ38131494
Outcomes of lobectomy in patients with severely compromised lung function (predicted postoperative diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide % ≤ 40%).Q38135436
Early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: surgery, stereotactic radiosurgery, and individualized adjuvant therapyQ38190726
Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for locally advanced lung cancerQ42153879
Impact of hospital volume of thoracoscopic lobectomy on primary lung cancer outcomesQ42617547
Better pulmonary function and prognosis with video-assisted thoracic surgery than with thoracotomyQ42638131
Serial changes in pulmonary function after video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy in lung cancer patientsQ43771702
Video-assisted thoracic surgery pulmonary resection for lung cancer in patients with poor lung function.Q44099979
Patterns of survival and recurrence after surgical treatment of early stage non-small cell lung carcinoma in the ACOSOG Z0030 (ALLIANCE) trialQ44978333
Is lobectomy by video-assisted thoracic surgery an adequate cancer operation?Q46103718
A case-matched study of anatomical segmentectomy versus lobectomy for stage I lung cancer in high-risk patients.Q47828118
Lobectomy--video-assisted thoracic surgery versus muscle-sparing thoracotomy. A randomized trialQ49193163
Video-assisted thoracic surgical non-rib spreading simultaneously stapled lobectomy: a more patient-friendly oncologic resection.Q51435822
Lung cancer surgery in the breathless patient--the benefits of avoiding the gold standard.Q51577815
[Complication rate after thoracoscopic and conventional lobectomy].Q52952660
Efficacy of mediastinal lymph node dissection during lobectomy for lung cancer by thoracoscopy and thoracotomy.Q53216465
Long-term prognosis of video-assisted limited surgery for early lung cancer.Q53336519
GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes.Q54771670
Measured FEV1 in the first postoperative day, and not ppoFEV1, is the best predictor of cardio-respiratory morbidity after lung resection☆Q56932569
Pulmonary function, postoperative pain, and serum cytokine level after lobectomy: a comparison of VATS and conventional procedureQ74408259
Minimally invasive lobectomy directed toward frail and high-risk patients: a case-control studyQ78043826
Thoracotomy is associated with significantly more profound suppression in lymphocytes and natural killer cells than video-assisted thoracic surgery following major lung resections for cancerQ80410983
Long-term survival after videothoracoscopic lobectomy for stage I lung cancerQ80557544
Pulmonary function after pulmonary resection by posterior thoracotomy, anterior thoracotomy or video-assisted surgeryQ82293878
Thoracoscopic lobectomy is associated with lower morbidity than open lobectomy: a propensity-matched analysis from the STS databaseQ82667031
Thoracoscopic lobectomy is associated with lower morbidity compared with thoracotomyQ84260676
Perioperative outcomes of thoracoscopic anatomic resections in patients with limited pulmonary reserveQ85015232
[Video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) sublobar anatomic resections for lung cancer]Q87389122
P275copyright licenseCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 InternationalQ20007257
P6216copyright statuscopyrightedQ50423863
P433issue7
P407language of work or nameEnglishQ1860
P921main subjectpulmonary function testQ1877462
lung neoplasmQ15124212
video-assisted surgeryQ72556070
P5008on focus list of Wikimedia projectScienceSourceQ55439927
P304page(s)e0124512
P577publication date2015-01-01
2015-07-06
P1433published inPLOS OneQ564954
P1476titleVideo-Assisted versus Open Lobectomy in Patients with Compromised Lung Function: A Literature Review and Meta-Analysis
P478volume10