scholarly article | Q13442814 |
P356 | DOI | 10.1111/J.1095-8312.1993.TB00887.X |
P3181 | OpenCitations bibliographic resource ID | 2398085 |
P2093 | author name string | DOLPH SCHLUTER | |
NANCY E. HECKMAN | |||
TREVOR PRICE | |||
P2860 | cites work | Costs and Benefits of Female Mate Choice: Is There a Lek Paradox? | Q56430257 |
Sexual Selection and the Evolution of Song | Q56432237 | ||
Patterns of variation in tail ornament size in birds | Q56686568 | ||
Plumage coloration is a sexually selected indicator of male quality | Q56689069 | ||
Signals, Signal Conditions, and the Direction of Evolution | Q57893481 | ||
Natural and sexual selection on color patterns in poeciliid fishes | Q57893648 | ||
Viability costs of male tail ornaments in a swallow | Q59064395 | ||
Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits | Q24634925 | ||
Biological signals as handicaps | Q28298209 | ||
The cost of honesty (further remarks on the handicap principle) | Q28304186 | ||
Female choice selects for male sexual tail ornaments in the monogamous swallow | Q30050496 | ||
Directional Selection and the Evolution of Breeding Date in Birds | Q46136960 | ||
Sexual selection unhandicapped by the Fisher process. | Q52481005 | ||
THE EVOLUTION OF COSTLY MATE PREFERENCES II. THE "HANDICAP" PRINCIPLE. | Q53246092 | ||
SEXUAL SELECTION AND THE EVOLUTION OF FEMALE CHOICE. | Q54018405 | ||
EFFECTS OF A HAEMATOPHAGOUS MITE ON THE BARN SWALLOW (HIRUNDO RUSTICA): A TEST OF THE HAMILTON AND ZUK HYPOTHESIS. | Q54319661 | ||
The Handicap Mechanism of Sexual Selection Does Not Work | Q55966923 | ||
Phenotypic plasticity and the handicap principle | Q55966924 | ||
The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek | Q56020653 | ||
P433 | issue | 3 | |
P921 | main subject | sexual selection | Q206913 |
P304 | page(s) | 187-211 | |
P577 | publication date | 1993-03-01 | |
P1433 | published in | Biological Journal of the Linnean Society | Q2653025 |
P1476 | title | Sexual selection when the female directly benefits | |
P478 | volume | 48 |
Q37482484 | Adult fitness consequences of sexual selection in Drosophila melanogaster |
Q35598482 | Behavioral reduction of infection risk. |
Q24670262 | Brighter yellow blue tits make better parents |
Q30456118 | Calling, courtship, and condition in the fall field cricket, Gryllus pennsylvanicus |
Q51787331 | Can non-directional male mating preferences facilitate honest female ornamentation? |
Q51543213 | Costly signals in a field cricket can indicate high- or low-quality direct benefits depending upon the environment. |
Q38078466 | Do male secondary sexual characters signal ejaculate quality? A meta-analysis |
Q39108953 | Do males pay for sex? Sex-specific selection coefficients suggest not. |
Q39835048 | Does a trade‐off between current reproductive success and survival affect the honesty of male signalling in species with male parental care? |
Q38655192 | Does human ejaculate quality relate to phenotypic traits? |
Q57159502 | Environmental determination of a sexually selected trait |
Q51074836 | Evolution of opsin expression in birds driven by sexual selection and habitat. |
Q37058732 | Female mate preferences for male body size and shape promote sexual isolation in threespine sticklebacks. |
Q39435464 | Female mating preferences determine system-level evolution in a gene network model |
Q47256537 | GENOTYPE-BY-ENVIRONMENT INTERACTIONS IN THE DETERMINATION OF THE SIZE OF A SECONDARY SEXUAL CHARACTER IN THE COLLARED FLYCATCHER (FICEDULA ALBICOLLIS). |
Q44410371 | GEOGRAPHIC VARIATION IN FEMALE PREFERENCES FOR MALE TRAITS IN POECILIA RETICULATA. |
Q35939182 | Genetic conflict between sexual signalling and juvenile survival in the three-spined stickleback |
Q47620466 | Leader preference in Neoconocephalus ensiger katydids: a female preference for a nonheritable male trait. |
Q35080249 | Male courtship behavior and weapon trait as indicators of indirect benefit in the bean bug, Riptortus pedestris |
Q73411951 | Maternal effects, paternal effects and sexual selection |
Q50999035 | Mating behavior as an indicator of quality of Drosophila subobscura males? |
Q51295499 | Nongenetic inheritance and the evolution of costly female preference. |
Q36388580 | PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF THE EVOLUTION OF ALTERNATIVE SOCIAL BEHAVIOR IN THE MANAKINS (AVES: PIPRIDAE). |
Q37519626 | Perfect genetic correlation between number of offspring and grandoffspring in an industrialized human population. |
Q52202018 | SEXUAL SELECTION, VIABILITY SELECTION, AND DEVELOPMENTAL STABILITY IN THE DOMESTIC FLY MUSCA DOMESTICA. |
Q47302177 | SIZE-DEPENDENT ASYMMETRY: FLUCTUATING ASYMMETRY VERSUS ANTISYMMETRY AND ITS RELEVANCE TO CONDITION-DEPENDENT SIGNALING. |
Q46211997 | SPECIATION BY REINFORCEMENT OF PREMATING ISOLATION. |
Q56115447 | Second to fourth digit ratio in elite musicians |
Q29392649 | Sexual conflict |
Q56032240 | Sexual dimorphism and allometry in the giant water strider Gigantometra gigas |
Q34308599 | Sexual selection, honest advertisement and the handicap principle: reviewing the evidence |
Q30382290 | Structural (UV) and carotenoid-based plumage coloration - signals for parental investment? |
Q34222467 | Temperature, but not available energy, affects the expression of a sexually selected ultraviolet (UV) colour trait in male European green lizards |
Q37926222 | The evolution and significance of male mate choice |
Q24669654 | The evolution of mate choice and mating biases |
Q36083449 | The genetic architecture of house fly mating behavior |
Q36576404 | The transcriptomic basis of tissue- and nutrition-dependent sexual dimorphism in the beetle Onthophagus taurus |
Search more.