scholarly article | Q13442814 |
P356 | DOI | 10.1016/S0016-5107(00)70285-9 |
P8608 | Fatcat ID | release_okuhay77dzhwlkknub2jx66zyu |
P698 | PubMed publication ID | 10805837 |
P2093 | author name string | S M Schutz | |
R M Abbott | |||
P2860 | cites work | Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus | Q37780048 |
Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study | Q50161050 | ||
A new system for defining endoscopic complications emphasizing the measure of importance. | Q52276962 | ||
Stenting in Severe Chronic Pancreatitis: Results of Medium-Term Follow-Up in Seventy-Six Patients | Q67926199 | ||
New modalities for treating chronic pancreatitis | Q69586892 | ||
Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy | Q71472169 | ||
Success and yield of second attempt ERCP | Q71890623 | ||
P433 | issue | 5 | |
P407 | language of work or name | English | Q1860 |
P304 | page(s) | 535-539 | |
P577 | publication date | 2000-05-01 | |
P1433 | published in | Gastrointestinal Endoscopy | Q15724481 |
P1476 | title | Grading ERCPs by degree of difficulty: a new concept to produce more meaningful outcome data | |
P478 | volume | 51 |
Q83341989 | A new grading system to evaluate the risk of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography |
Q37768377 | A retrospective study of the safety and efficacy of ERCP in octogenarians |
Q35953924 | Are we meeting the standards set for endoscopy? Results of a large-scale prospective survey of endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatograph practice |
Q38076736 | Asia-Pacific consensus recommendations for endoscopic and interventional management of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. |
Q42293549 | Biliary boulders |
Q84896695 | Can endoscopic palliation of large neoplasm increase the risk of pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography? |
Q33732027 | Compliance with evidence-based multidisciplinary guidelines on perihilar cholangiocarcinoma |
Q81042541 | Complications of ERCP: a prospective study |
Q37738073 | Difficult biliary cannulation |
Q48292098 | Does anesthesiologist-directed sedation for ERCP improve deep cannulation and complication rates? |
Q39023599 | ERCP cannulation success benchmarking: implications for certification and validation |
Q36020696 | ERCP cannulation: a review of reported techniques |
Q43917395 | ERCP in the very elderly: outcomes among patients older than eighty |
Q47305319 | Effect of body weight on fixed dose of diclofenac for the prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis |
Q53625053 | Endoscopic Biliary and Pancreatic Sphincterotomy. |
Q40505365 | Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography can be performed safely in ambulatory centers |
Q36939639 | Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: is the centre better? The case against centralisation of ERCP services |
Q42946532 | Factors significantly contributing to a failed conventional endoscopic stone clearance in patients with "difficult" choledecholithiasis: a single-center experience. |
Q40060533 | First progress report on the Japan Endoscopy Database (JED) project |
Q44151711 | Gabexate or somatostatin administration before ERCP in patients at high risk for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a multicenter, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial |
Q35691415 | Grading the degree of difficulty of ERCP procedures. |
Q80177286 | Identification of significant difficulty of selective deep cannulation by a simple predictive model: an endoscopic scale for teaching ERCP |
Q35007057 | Income and outcome metrics for the objective evaluation of ERCP and alternative methods |
Q33600725 | Long-term follow-up of therapeutic ERCP in 78 patients aged 90 years or older. |
Q35517331 | Objective evaluation of ERCP procedures: a simple grading scale for evaluating technical difficulty |
Q58999503 | Optimal Positioning for ERCP: Efficacy and Safety of ERCP in Prone versus Left Lateral Decubitus Position |
Q43554689 | Patient-reported outcome measures after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a prospective, multicentre study |
Q35013679 | Predicting native papilla biliary cannulation success using a multinational Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) Quality Network |
Q36615932 | Prophecy about post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: from divination to science |
Q44514988 | Prophylaxis of ERCP-related pancreatitis: a randomized, controlled trial of somatostatin and gabexate mesylate |
Q74531100 | Quality assessment of ERCP. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopacreatography |
Q41819849 | Quality evaluation through self-assessment: a novel method to gain insight into ERCP performance |
Q37778713 | Quality measures and credentialing in gastrointestinal endoscopy |
Q47662585 | Quantitative assessment of technical proficiency in performing needle-knife precut papillotomy |
Q42233279 | Rotatable sphincterotome facilitates bile duct cannulation in patients with altered ampullary anatomy |
Q43071867 | Saudi gastroenterology association position statement on privilege and credentialing for performing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in Saudi Arabia |
Q45032815 | Target-controlled propofol infusion during monitored anesthesia in patients undergoing ERCP. |
Q89483291 | The ASGE grading system for ERCP can predict success and complication rates in a tertiary referral hospital |
Q36301177 | The H.O.U.S.E. classification: a novel endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) complexity grading scale. |
Q81585015 | Training surgeons in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography |
Q94392976 | UEG Week 2015 Oral Presentations |
Q56934656 | UEG Week 2015 Poster Presentations |
Q94340226 | UEG Week 2016 Poster Presentations |
Q35007062 | What are the determinants of success in utilization of ERCP in the setting of pancreatic and biliary diseases? |