Grading ERCPs by degree of difficulty: a new concept to produce more meaningful outcome data

scientific article

Grading ERCPs by degree of difficulty: a new concept to produce more meaningful outcome data is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1016/S0016-5107(00)70285-9
P8608Fatcat IDrelease_okuhay77dzhwlkknub2jx66zyu
P698PubMed publication ID10805837

P2093author name stringS M Schutz
R M Abbott
P2860cites workEndoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensusQ37780048
Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter studyQ50161050
A new system for defining endoscopic complications emphasizing the measure of importance.Q52276962
Stenting in Severe Chronic Pancreatitis: Results of Medium-Term Follow-Up in Seventy-Six PatientsQ67926199
New modalities for treating chronic pancreatitisQ69586892
Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomyQ71472169
Success and yield of second attempt ERCPQ71890623
P433issue5
P407language of work or nameEnglishQ1860
P304page(s)535-539
P577publication date2000-05-01
P1433published inGastrointestinal EndoscopyQ15724481
P1476titleGrading ERCPs by degree of difficulty: a new concept to produce more meaningful outcome data
P478volume51

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q83341989A new grading system to evaluate the risk of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
Q37768377A retrospective study of the safety and efficacy of ERCP in octogenarians
Q35953924Are we meeting the standards set for endoscopy? Results of a large-scale prospective survey of endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatograph practice
Q38076736Asia-Pacific consensus recommendations for endoscopic and interventional management of hilar cholangiocarcinoma.
Q42293549Biliary boulders
Q84896695Can endoscopic palliation of large neoplasm increase the risk of pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography?
Q33732027Compliance with evidence-based multidisciplinary guidelines on perihilar cholangiocarcinoma
Q81042541Complications of ERCP: a prospective study
Q37738073Difficult biliary cannulation
Q48292098Does anesthesiologist-directed sedation for ERCP improve deep cannulation and complication rates?
Q39023599ERCP cannulation success benchmarking: implications for certification and validation
Q36020696ERCP cannulation: a review of reported techniques
Q43917395ERCP in the very elderly: outcomes among patients older than eighty
Q47305319Effect of body weight on fixed dose of diclofenac for the prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis
Q53625053Endoscopic Biliary and Pancreatic Sphincterotomy.
Q40505365Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography can be performed safely in ambulatory centers
Q36939639Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: is the centre better? The case against centralisation of ERCP services
Q42946532Factors significantly contributing to a failed conventional endoscopic stone clearance in patients with "difficult" choledecholithiasis: a single-center experience.
Q40060533First progress report on the Japan Endoscopy Database (JED) project
Q44151711Gabexate or somatostatin administration before ERCP in patients at high risk for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a multicenter, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial
Q35691415Grading the degree of difficulty of ERCP procedures.
Q80177286Identification of significant difficulty of selective deep cannulation by a simple predictive model: an endoscopic scale for teaching ERCP
Q35007057Income and outcome metrics for the objective evaluation of ERCP and alternative methods
Q33600725Long-term follow-up of therapeutic ERCP in 78 patients aged 90 years or older.
Q35517331Objective evaluation of ERCP procedures: a simple grading scale for evaluating technical difficulty
Q58999503Optimal Positioning for ERCP: Efficacy and Safety of ERCP in Prone versus Left Lateral Decubitus Position
Q43554689Patient-reported outcome measures after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a prospective, multicentre study
Q35013679Predicting native papilla biliary cannulation success using a multinational Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) Quality Network
Q36615932Prophecy about post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: from divination to science
Q44514988Prophylaxis of ERCP-related pancreatitis: a randomized, controlled trial of somatostatin and gabexate mesylate
Q74531100Quality assessment of ERCP. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopacreatography
Q41819849Quality evaluation through self-assessment: a novel method to gain insight into ERCP performance
Q37778713Quality measures and credentialing in gastrointestinal endoscopy
Q47662585Quantitative assessment of technical proficiency in performing needle-knife precut papillotomy
Q42233279Rotatable sphincterotome facilitates bile duct cannulation in patients with altered ampullary anatomy
Q43071867Saudi gastroenterology association position statement on privilege and credentialing for performing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in Saudi Arabia
Q45032815Target-controlled propofol infusion during monitored anesthesia in patients undergoing ERCP.
Q89483291The ASGE grading system for ERCP can predict success and complication rates in a tertiary referral hospital
Q36301177The H.O.U.S.E. classification: a novel endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) complexity grading scale.
Q81585015Training surgeons in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
Q94392976UEG Week 2015 Oral Presentations
Q56934656UEG Week 2015 Poster Presentations
Q94340226UEG Week 2016 Poster Presentations
Q35007062What are the determinants of success in utilization of ERCP in the setting of pancreatic and biliary diseases?