scholarly article | Q13442814 |
P6179 | Dimensions Publication ID | 1085590831 |
P356 | DOI | 10.1186/S12913-017-2269-1 |
P932 | PMC publication ID | 5445482 |
P698 | PubMed publication ID | 28545430 |
P50 | author | Duncan Mortimer | Q51905445 |
Claire A Harris | Q56606249 | ||
P2093 | author name string | Richard King | |
Cara Waller | |||
Kelly Allen | |||
Tim Dyer | |||
Vanessa Brooke | |||
Wayne Ramsey | |||
P2860 | cites work | New drugs for old: disinvestment and NICE | Q57774131 |
Tools of the trade: a comparative analysis of approaches to priority setting in healthcare | Q73518689 | ||
Study designs for PDSA quality improvement research | Q76377434 | ||
Are economic evaluations and health technology assessments increasingly demanded in times of rationing health services? The case of the Argentine financial crisis | Q80308295 | ||
Reallocating resources: how should the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence guide disinvestment efforts in the National Health Service? | Q80836900 | ||
Health-care decision-making processes in Latin America: problems and prospects for the use of economic evaluation | Q81451309 | ||
Tools for priority setting: lessons from South Australia | Q82429995 | ||
Identifying existing health care services that do not provide value for money | Q83499896 | ||
Rational disinvestment | Q84369458 | ||
To fund or not to fund: development of a decision-making framework for the coverage of new health technologies | Q84558251 | ||
Disinvestment from low value clinical interventions: NICEly done? | Q84602898 | ||
Health technology reassessment: scope, methodology, & language | Q84974956 | ||
Looking for value in health care | Q85482002 | ||
Over 150 potentially low-value health care practices: an Australian study. Reply | Q87208316 | ||
Which health technologies should be funded? A prioritization framework based explicitly on value for money | Q21195870 | ||
Effectiveness of organisational infrastructures to promote evidence-based nursing practice | Q24203722 | ||
Towards understanding the de-adoption of low-value clinical practices: a scoping review | Q26786656 | ||
A systematic review of barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by policymakers | Q26827309 | ||
Information-seeking behaviors and other factors contributing to successful implementation of evidence-based practices in local health departments | Q26852937 | ||
Are low-value care measures up to the task? A systematic review of the literature. | Q27305335 | ||
Development, implementation and evaluation of an evidence-based program for introduction of new health technologies and clinical practices in a local healthcare setting. | Q27307124 | ||
Barriers and facilitators to uptake of systematic reviews by policy makers and health care managers: a scoping review | Q28076585 | ||
Setting Healthcare Priorities at the Macro and Meso Levels: A Framework for Evaluation | Q28083424 | ||
From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients' care | Q29615123 | ||
Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations | Q29619132 | ||
Three approaches to qualitative content analysis | Q29619566 | ||
Contradicted and initially stronger effects in highly cited clinical research | Q29620013 | ||
Sustainability in Health care by Allocating Resources Effectively (SHARE) 5: developing a model for evidence-driven resource allocation in a local healthcare setting | Q29994731 | ||
Sustainability in health care by allocating resources effectively (SHARE) 3: examining how resource allocation decisions are made, implemented and evaluated in a local healthcare setting. | Q29994741 | ||
Sustainability in Health care by Allocating Resources Effectively (SHARE) 2: identifying opportunities for disinvestment in a local healthcare setting | Q29994821 | ||
Sustainability in health care by allocating resources effectively (SHARE) 4: exploring opportunities and methods for consumer engagement in resource allocation in a local healthcare setting. | Q29994822 | ||
Cost-effective critical care: cost containment and rationing | Q30420183 | ||
Barriers to the uptake of evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses: a systematic review of decision makers' perceptions | Q30524832 | ||
Current status of health technology reassessment of non-drug technologies: survey and key informant interviews | Q30532042 | ||
Mapping of multiple criteria for priority setting of health interventions: an aid for decision makers | Q30534774 | ||
Evidence and Value: Impact on DEcisionMaking--the EVIDEM framework and potential applications | Q33395099 | ||
Integrating local data into hospital-based healthcare technology assessment: two case studies | Q33618616 | ||
Reorienting programme budgeting and marginal analysis (PBMA) towards disinvestment | Q33717599 | ||
Qualitative research in health care. Using qualitative methods in health related action research | Q33817196 | ||
Sustainability in Health care by Allocating Resources Effectively (SHARE) 7: supporting staff in evidence-based decision-making, implementation and evaluation in a local healthcare setting. | Q33823627 | ||
Development of WHO guidelines on generalized cost-effectiveness analysis | Q33903387 | ||
Choosing wisely--the politics and economics of labeling low-value services. | Q33923451 | ||
The case study approach | Q33943768 | ||
??? | Q27001963 | ||
Health technology prioritization: which criteria for prioritizing new technologies and what are their relative weights? | Q34149291 | ||
High-value, cost-conscious health care: concepts for clinicians to evaluate the benefits, harms, and costs of medical interventions | Q34161821 | ||
Disentangling rhetoric and reality: an international Delphi study of factors and processes that facilitate the successful implementation of decisions to decommission healthcare services. | Q34234049 | ||
Choosing wisely: helping physicians and patients make smart decisions about their care | Q34267269 | ||
Over 150 potentially low-value health care practices: an Australian study. | Q34481104 | ||
Trends in procedures for infertility and caesarean sections: was NICE disinvestment guidance implemented? NICE recommendation reminders | Q34578912 | ||
Reducing ineffective practice: challenges in identifying low-value health care using Cochrane systematic reviews. | Q34580758 | ||
Case studies that illustrate disinvestment and resource allocation decision-making processes in health care: a systematic review | Q34628761 | ||
A population-based model for priority setting across the care continuum and across modalities | Q34690542 | ||
Barriers, facilitators and views about next steps to implementing supports for evidence-informed decision-making in health systems: a qualitative study | Q34987867 | ||
Implementing culture change in health care: theory and practice | Q35111242 | ||
Using failure mode and effects analysis to improve patient safety | Q35186520 | ||
The EVIDEM framework and its usefulness for priority setting across a broad range of health interventions | Q35339248 | ||
Challenges in Australian policy processes for disinvestment from existing, ineffective health care practices | Q36326845 | ||
From efficacy to equity: Literature review of decision criteria for resource allocation and healthcare decisionmaking | Q36390478 | ||
FROM TALK TO ACTION: POLICY STAKEHOLDERS, APPROPRIATENESS, AND SELECTIVE DISINVESTMENT. | Q36397945 | ||
The ASTUTE Health study protocol: deliberative stakeholder engagements to inform implementation approaches to healthcare disinvestment | Q36462962 | ||
Priority setting in health care: Lessons from the experiences of eight countries | Q36470119 | ||
How hard can it be to include research evidence and evaluation in local health policy implementation? Results from a mixed methods study | Q36621246 | ||
Priority setting for health technology assessments: a systematic review of current practical approaches | Q36853726 | ||
Knowledge to action for solving complex problems: insights from a review of nine international cases. | Q37011544 | ||
A systematic review of the use of economic evaluation in local decision-making | Q37055893 | ||
The use of economic evaluations in NHS decision-making: a review and empirical investigation | Q37122016 | ||
Balancing efficiency, equity and feasibility of HIV treatment in South Africa - development of programmatic guidance | Q37365039 | ||
The completeness of intervention descriptions in published National Institute of Health Research HTA-funded trials: a cross-sectional study | Q37516539 | ||
Managing healthcare budgets in times of austerity: the role of program budgeting and marginal analysis | Q37653177 | ||
Guiding the process of health technology disinvestment. | Q37773696 | ||
6-STEPPPs: A Modular Tool to Facilitate Clinician Participation in Fair Decisions for Funding New Cancer Drugs | Q37790982 | ||
Priority setting in healthcare: towards guidelines for the program budgeting and marginal analysis framework. | Q37800480 | ||
Evidence-based practice barriers and facilitators from a continuous quality improvement perspective: an integrative review | Q37827570 | ||
Appropriate use of screening and diagnostic tests to foster high-value, cost-conscious care | Q37976396 | ||
Engaging clinicians in evidence-based disinvestment: role and perceptions of evidence. | Q38043658 | ||
Health technology reassessment of non-drug technologies: current practices | Q38043659 | ||
Prioritizing investment in public health and health equity: what can commissioners do? | Q38103106 | ||
A decade of reversal: an analysis of 146 contradicted medical practices | Q38122863 | ||
Are we there yet? A journey of health reform in Australia | Q38132224 | ||
Will Choosing Wisely® improve quality and lower costs of care for patients with critical illness? | Q38206824 | ||
Changing priority setting practice: the role of implementation in practice change. | Q38210764 | ||
'Choosing Wisely': a growing international campaign | Q38304902 | ||
Disinvestment and Value-Based Purchasing Strategies for Pharmaceuticals: An International Review | Q38517704 | ||
Measuring the effect of Choosing Wisely: an integrated framework to assess campaign impact on low-value care | Q38532515 | ||
Health services under siege: the case for clinical process redesign | Q38572590 | ||
DISINVESTING FROM INEFFECTIVE TECHNOLOGIES: LESSONS LEARNED FROM CURRENT PROGRAMS. | Q38676374 | ||
Tackling disinvestment in health care services. The views of resource allocators in the English NHS. | Q39273040 | ||
Sustainability in Health care by Allocating Resources Effectively (SHARE) 9: conceptualising disinvestment in the local healthcare setting. | Q41467201 | ||
Sustainability in Health care by Allocating Resources Effectively (SHARE) 10: operationalising disinvestment in a conceptual framework for resource allocation. | Q41522866 | ||
More than "using research": the real challenges in promoting evidence-informed decision-making. | Q41838366 | ||
Sustainability in Health care by allocating resources effectively (SHARE) 1: introducing a series of papers reporting an investigation of disinvestment in a local healthcare setting. | Q42354757 | ||
Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: the need for a scientific method | Q42620089 | ||
Evidence-based de-implementation for contradicted, unproven, and aspiring healthcare practices | Q42742549 | ||
'It ain't what you do it's the way that you do it': lessons for health care from decommissioning of older people's services. | Q43418778 | ||
The value of low-value lists. | Q43479744 | ||
Nursing practice, knowledge, attitudes and perceived barriers to evidence-based practice at an academic medical center | Q43747140 | ||
Disinvestment in the age of cost-cutting sound and fury. Tools for the Spanish National Health System | Q43788691 | ||
Which criteria are considered in healthcare decisions? Insights from an international survey of policy and clinical decision makers | Q44234115 | ||
Design and use of performance measures to decrease low-value services and achieve cost-conscious care | Q44654794 | ||
A therapeutic equivalence program: evidence-based promotion of more efficient use of medicines. | Q45971674 | ||
"Choosing wisely" to reduce low-value care: a conceptual and ethical analysis | Q46729606 | ||
Using health technology assessment to support optimal use of technologies in current practice: the challenge of "disinvestment". | Q46810243 | ||
"I won't call it rationing...": an ethnographic study of healthcare disinvestment in theory and practice | Q47441553 | ||
Evaluating action research | Q47651611 | ||
A Magnet community hospital: Fewer barriers to nursing research utilization | Q48335832 | ||
Sustainability in Health care by Allocating Resources Effectively (SHARE) 8: developing, implementing and evaluating an evidence dissemination service in a local healthcare setting. | Q52369121 | ||
Limits to health care: fair procedures, democratic deliberation, and the legitimacy problem for insurers. | Q53466094 | ||
Breaking up is hard to do: why disinvestment in medical technology is harder than investment. | Q54443183 | ||
Priority-setting and rationing in healthcare: Evidence from the English experience | Q57189528 | ||
P433 | issue | 1 | |
P407 | language of work or name | English | Q1860 |
P304 | page(s) | 370 | |
P577 | publication date | 2017-05-25 | |
P1433 | published in | BMC Health Services Research | Q4835946 |
P1476 | title | Sustainability in Health care by Allocating Resources Effectively (SHARE) 6: investigating methods to identify, prioritise, implement and evaluate disinvestment projects in a local healthcare setting | |
P478 | volume | 17 |
Q91926280 | An evidence-based framework for identifying technologies of no or low-added value (NLVT) |
Q64058052 | How does priority setting for resource allocation happen in commissioning dental services in a nationally led, regionally delivered system: a qualitative study using semistructured interviews with NHS England dental commissioners |
Q49825580 | Public health policies and scientific evidence |
Q41522866 | Sustainability in Health care by Allocating Resources Effectively (SHARE) 10: operationalising disinvestment in a conceptual framework for resource allocation. |
Q55322389 | Sustainability in Health care by Allocating Resources Effectively (SHARE) 11: reporting outcomes of an evidence-driven approach to disinvestment in a local healthcare setting. |
Q29994821 | Sustainability in Health care by Allocating Resources Effectively (SHARE) 2: identifying opportunities for disinvestment in a local healthcare setting |
Q29994731 | Sustainability in Health care by Allocating Resources Effectively (SHARE) 5: developing a model for evidence-driven resource allocation in a local healthcare setting |
Q33823627 | Sustainability in Health care by Allocating Resources Effectively (SHARE) 7: supporting staff in evidence-based decision-making, implementation and evaluation in a local healthcare setting. |
Q52369121 | Sustainability in Health care by Allocating Resources Effectively (SHARE) 8: developing, implementing and evaluating an evidence dissemination service in a local healthcare setting. |
Q41467201 | Sustainability in Health care by Allocating Resources Effectively (SHARE) 9: conceptualising disinvestment in the local healthcare setting. |
Q42354757 | Sustainability in Health care by allocating resources effectively (SHARE) 1: introducing a series of papers reporting an investigation of disinvestment in a local healthcare setting. |
Q29994741 | Sustainability in health care by allocating resources effectively (SHARE) 3: examining how resource allocation decisions are made, implemented and evaluated in a local healthcare setting. |
Q29994822 | Sustainability in health care by allocating resources effectively (SHARE) 4: exploring opportunities and methods for consumer engagement in resource allocation in a local healthcare setting. |
Search more.