Comparisons between a pencil beam and two fan beam dual energy X-ray absorptiometers used for measuring total body bone and soft tissue

scientific article

Comparisons between a pencil beam and two fan beam dual energy X-ray absorptiometers used for measuring total body bone and soft tissue is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1259/BJR.74.878.740166
P698PubMed publication ID11718390
P5875ResearchGate publication ID11637827

P2093author name stringWilkinson S
Hannan WJ
Tothill P
P2860cites workStatistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurementQ26778461
Anomalies in dual energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements of total-body bone mineral during weight change using Lunar, Hologic and Norland instrumentsQ30831058
Nutritional status of the Finnish elite ski jumpersQ31976038
Universal standardization for dual x-ray absorptiometry: patient and phantom cross-calibration resultsQ36711887
Cross-calibration of a fan-beam X-ray densitometer with a pencil-beam systemQ36813689
The effect of weight change on DXA scans in a 2-year trial of etidronate therapyQ36888674
Anomalies in the measurement of changes in total-body bone mineral by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry during weight changeQ36893317
An assessment of the radiation dose to patients and staff from a Lunar Expert-XL fan beam densitometerQ38529232
Comparisons between three dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers used for measuring spine and femurQ38531722
Precision and accuracy of measurements of whole-body bone mineral: comparisons between Hologic, Lunar and Norland dual-energy X-ray absorptiometersQ38532090
Body composition by x-ray absorptiometry and bioelectrical impedance in female runners.Q52252178
P433issue878
P407language of work or nameEnglishQ1860
P304page(s)166-176
P577publication date2001-02-01
P1433published inBritish Journal of RadiologyQ15758529
P1476titleComparisons between a pencil beam and two fan beam dual energy X-ray absorptiometers used for measuring total body bone and soft tissue
P478volume74

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q35176688Applying the right statistics: analyses of measurement studies
Q38128664Assessing body composition in taller or broader individuals using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: a systematic review.
Q47362995Association between weight changes and changes in hip geometric indices in the Japanese female population during 10-year follow-up: Japanese Population-based Osteoporosis (JPOS) Cohort Study
Q33263473Body composition analysis by dual X-ray absorptiometry: in vivo and in vitro comparison of three different fan-beam instruments
Q36204190Bone mineral density in patients with recently diagnosed, active rheumatoid arthritis
Q33196234Comparison of Hologic QDR-1000/W and 4500W DXA Scanners in 13- to 18-Year Olds
Q36088330Comparison of Standing Posture Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis with DXA for Body Composition in a Large, Healthy Chinese Population
Q51942720Comparison of body composition methods in obese African-American women.
Q30985451Comparison of spine and femur reference data in native Chinese women from different regions of China.
Q33489224Correcting fan-beam magnification in clinical densitometry scans of growing subjects
Q31150464Cross-calibration of GE/Lunar pencil and fan-beam dual energy densitometers--bone mineral density and body composition studies
Q37981249Current status of body composition assessment in sport: review and position statement on behalf of the ad hoc research working group on body composition health and performance, under the auspices of the I.O.C. Medical Commission
Q79961184Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements of fat and lean masses in subjects with eating disorders
Q35774652Estimates of body fat in children by Hologic QDR-2000 and QDR-4500A dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers compared with deuterium dilution
Q31147982Gender differences in volumetric bone density: a study of opposite-sex twins
Q47388167Impact of intra- and extra-osseous soft tissue composition on changes in bone mineral density with weight loss and regain
Q81877631Interdevice variability in percent fat estimates using the BOD POD
Q33604161Is body mass index a useful measure of excess body fatness in adolescents and young adults with Down syndrome?
Q47291047Location of body fat and body size impacts DXA soft tissue measures: a simulation study
Q50765665Longitudinal Bone Mineralization Assessment in Children Treated With Long-Term Parenteral Nutrition for Severe Intestinal Failure.
Q24793910Measuring body composition in overweight individuals by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry
Q30574492Normative data for bone mass in healthy term infants from birth to 1 year of age.
Q30800561Pediatric in vivo cross-calibration between the GE Lunar Prodigy and DPX-L bone densitometers
Q42268247Population differences in the relationship between height, weight, and adiposity: an application of Burton's model
Q33283866Precision and accuracy of measuring changes in bone mineral density by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry
Q35761045Predicting visceral adipose tissue by MRI using DXA and anthropometry in adolescents and young adults
Q87350189Solid anthropomorphic infant whole-body DXA phantom: design, evaluation, and multisite testing
Q33868985The IDEFICS validation study on field methods for assessing physical activity and body composition in children: design and data collection
Q37901367The impact of recent technological advances on the trueness and precision of DXA to assess body composition
Q58217231The prediction of visceral fat by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the elderly: a comparison with computed tomography and anthropometry
Q33386579iDXA, Prodigy, and DPXL dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry whole-body scans: a cross-calibration study

Search more.