review article | Q7318358 |
scholarly article | Q13442814 |
P6179 | Dimensions Publication ID | 1050740112 |
P356 | DOI | 10.1007/S00063-016-0170-Z |
P698 | PubMed publication ID | 27255226 |
P2093 | author name string | U Janssens | |
P2860 | cites work | The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3) | Q26768286 |
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012 | Q29615429 | ||
The rational clinical examination. Is this patient hypovolemic? | Q33543666 | ||
Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. | Q34553475 | ||
Hemodynamic monitoring in shock and implications for management. International Consensus Conference, Paris, France, 27-28 April 2006. | Q36730287 | ||
Hospital Incidence and Mortality Rates of Sepsis | Q36747916 | ||
What is a fluid challenge? | Q37867456 | ||
Does the central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? An updated meta-analysis and a plea for some common sense | Q38115095 | ||
Re-thinking resuscitation: leaving blood pressure cosmetics behind and moving forward to permissive hypotension and a tissue perfusion-based approach | Q38150548 | ||
Management of cardiogenic shock | Q38366956 | ||
Development of a fluid resuscitation protocol using inferior vena cava and lung ultrasound | Q38609408 | ||
Passive leg raising for predicting fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis | Q38716441 | ||
Early lactate clearance is associated with improved outcome in severe sepsis and septic shock | Q39691224 | ||
Bedside sonographic measurement of the inferior vena cava caval index is a poor predictor of fluid responsiveness in emergency department patients | Q40067225 | ||
Clinical assessment identifies hemodynamic profiles that predict outcomes in patients admitted with heart failure | Q40586285 | ||
Medical therapy of acute myocardial infarction by application of hemodynamic subsets (second of two parts) | Q40618569 | ||
Early goal directed therapy in severe sepsis | Q41724662 | ||
Admission hyperlactatemia: causes, incidence, and impact on outcome of patients admitted in a general medical intensive care unit | Q44477121 | ||
Shock--what are the basics? | Q44784267 | ||
The respiratory variation in inferior vena cava diameter as a guide to fluid therapy. | Q48001348 | ||
Respiratory changes in inferior vena cava diameter are helpful in predicting fluid responsiveness in ventilated septic patients | Q48003378 | ||
Focused ultrasound training for clinicians | Q48618409 | ||
Elevation of systemic oxygen delivery in the treatment of critically ill patients. | Q51631613 | ||
Capillary fluid exchange. | Q52171575 | ||
High versus Low Blood-Pressure Target in Patients with Septic Shock | Q57016679 | ||
Skin turgor: do we understand the clinical sign? | Q72451367 | ||
[Shock] | Q72721870 | ||
[Hemodynamic monitoring] | Q73206414 | ||
Usefulness of left ventricular stroke volume variation to assess fluid responsiveness in patients with reduced cardiac function | Q73445545 | ||
Respiratory changes in aortic blood velocity as an indicator of fluid responsiveness in ventilated patients with septic shock | Q73598699 | ||
Relation between respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure and fluid responsiveness in septic patients with acute circulatory failure | Q74025582 | ||
[Required monitoring in the intensive care unit] | Q79409015 | ||
[Perioperative fluid and volume management. Goal-directed therapy necessary!] | Q80732076 | ||
Transthoracic echocardiography for cardiopulmonary monitoring in intensive care | Q81131881 | ||
[Hemodynamic monitoring in the perioperative period] | Q81235366 | ||
[Systemic optimisation of oxygen-delivery -- cardiac improvement] | Q81478264 | ||
[The use of ultrasound in intensive care medicine] | Q83198144 | ||
Mottling score predicts survival in septic shock | Q83528795 | ||
[Acute heart failure: diagnosis and monitoring] | Q84008256 | ||
[Acute heart failure] | Q84357348 | ||
Early lactate clearance-guided therapy in patients with sepsis: a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials | Q85555851 | ||
Point-of-care ultrasound to estimate central venous pressure: a comparison of three techniques | Q85895963 | ||
[Indication and control of volume therapy. First things first] | Q86993219 | ||
Intensive care ultrasound: VI. Fluid responsiveness and shock assessment | Q87159152 | ||
Volume responsive, but does the patient need volume? | Q87186315 | ||
Cardiogenic Shock: How Long Does the Storm Last? | Q87321168 | ||
Capillary refill time exploration during septic shock | Q87841892 | ||
Vasopressors in shock: are we meeting our target and do we really understand what we are aiming at? | Q95558107 | ||
P433 | issue | 7 | |
P407 | language of work or name | German | Q188 |
P921 | main subject | hemodynamics | Q1642137 |
P304 | page(s) | 619-629 | |
P577 | publication date | 2016-06-02 | |
P1433 | published in | Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin | Q27723977 |
P1476 | title | Hemodynamic monitoring of critically ill patients : Bedside integration of data | |
P478 | volume | 111 |
Search more.