| scholarly article | Q13442814 |
| P50 | author | Richard D. Riley | Q42074601 |
| Joie Ensor | Q57073749 | ||
| P2093 | author name string | Dan Jackson | |
| Danielle L Burke | |||
| P2860 | cites work | Statistical analysis of individual participant data meta-analyses: a comparison of methods and recommendations for practice | Q21134027 |
| Individual participant data meta-analysis for a binary outcome: one-stage or two-stage? | Q21559668 | ||
| The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration | Q27860581 | ||
| Meta-analysis in clinical trials | Q27860779 | ||
| Meta-analysis of randomised trials with a continuous outcome according to baseline imbalance and availability of individual participant data | Q30585374 | ||
| Meta-analysis of continuous outcome data from individual patients. | Q30657054 | ||
| A comparison of summary patient-level covariates in meta-regression with individual patient data meta-analysis | Q30669346 | ||
| Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of individual participant data: the PRISMA-IPD Statement | Q30940208 | ||
| Meta-analysis of a binary outcome using individual participant data and aggregate data | Q30968230 | ||
| Individual patient data meta-analysis of time-to-event outcomes: one-stage versus two-stage approaches for estimating the hazard ratio under a random effects model. | Q30969307 | ||
| A decade of individual participant data meta-analyses: A review of current practice | Q30975392 | ||
| Get real in individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis: a review of the methodology | Q30988193 | ||
| Improving ecological inference using individual-level data | Q31010622 | ||
| Evidence synthesis combining individual patient data and aggregate data: a systematic review identified current practice and possible methods | Q31108600 | ||
| Meta-analysis of individual- and aggregate-level data. | Q31113276 | ||
| Meta-analysis of continuous outcomes combining individual patient data and aggregate data | Q31139467 | ||
| Comparison of Meta-Analysis Versus Analysis of Variance of Individual Patient Data | Q32067832 | ||
| Meta-analysis of individual participant data: rationale, conduct, and reporting | Q33530020 | ||
| Comparison of one-step and two-step meta-analysis models using individual patient data | Q33547066 | ||
| Random effects meta-analysis of event outcome in the framework of the generalized linear mixed model with applications in sparse data | Q33688254 | ||
| Multivariate meta-analysis: potential and promise | Q33804037 | ||
| A critical review of methods for the assessment of patient-level interactions in individual participant data meta-analysis of randomized trials, and guidance for practitioners. | Q33848700 | ||
| Assessment of publication bias, selection bias, and unavailable data in meta-analyses using individual participant data: a database survey | Q34116497 | ||
| Individual patient data meta-analysis of survival data using Poisson regression models | Q34207372 | ||
| Advanced methods in meta-analysis: multivariate approach and meta-regression. | Q34523076 | ||
| Consistency and inconsistency in network meta-analysis: model estimation using multivariate meta-regression | Q35612972 | ||
| Consistency and inconsistency in network meta-analysis: concepts and models for multi-arm studies | Q35612977 | ||
| Two new methods to fit models for network meta-analysis with random inconsistency effects | Q36087905 | ||
| Systolic and diastolic blood pressure lowering as determinants of cardiovascular outcome | Q36101466 | ||
| A comparison of meta-analytic results using literature vs individual patient data. Paternal cell immunization for recurrent miscarriage | Q36691413 | ||
| Comparison of effect estimates from a meta-analysis of summary data from published studies and from a meta-analysis using individual patient data for ovarian cancer studies | Q36860588 | ||
| Evaluation of networks of randomized trials | Q36966424 | ||
| Borrowing of strength and study weights in multivariate and network meta-analysis | Q40346807 | ||
| Extending DerSimonian and Laird's methodology to perform network meta-analyses with random inconsistency effects. | Q40481787 | ||
| A design-by-treatment interaction model for network meta-analysis with random inconsistency effects | Q42243147 | ||
| A refined method for the meta‐analysis of controlled clinical trials with binary outcome | Q43848299 | ||
| Random-effects meta-analysis of inconsistent effects: a time for change | Q45159338 | ||
| The binomial distribution of meta-analysis was preferred to model within-study variability. | Q46847691 | ||
| Robust variance estimation in meta-regression with dependent effect size estimates. | Q47577786 | ||
| A random-effects regression model for meta-analysis | Q72228939 | ||
| Incorporating variability in estimates of heterogeneity in the random effects model in meta-analysis | Q73298639 | ||
| P433 | issue | 10 | |
| P921 | main subject | meta-analysis | Q815382 |
| meta-regression | Q6822263 | ||
| P304 | page(s) | 2885-2905 | |
| P577 | publication date | 2017-02-06 | |
| P1433 | published in | Statistical Methods in Medical Research | Q7604374 |
| P1476 | title | Deriving percentage study weights in multi-parameter meta-analysis models: with application to meta-regression, network meta-analysis and one-stage individual participant data models | |
| P478 | volume | 27 |
| Q57542671 | Estimating the contribution of studies in network meta-analysis: paths, flows and streams |
| Q47552486 | Graphs of study contributions and covariate distributions for network meta-regression |
| Q48345507 | Guidance for deriving and presenting percentage study weights in meta-analysis of test accuracy studies. |
| Q92176183 | Meta-analysis of penile cancer: conceptual interpretations |
| Q41176592 | Multivariate and network meta-analysis of multiple outcomes and multiple treatments: rationale, concepts, and examples |
Search more.