scholarly article | Q13442814 |
P2093 | author name string | Gerhard Klebe | |
P2860 | cites work | All are not equal: a benchmark of different homology modeling programs | Q24644563 |
pH-dependent binding modes observed in trypsin crystals: lessons for structure-based drug design | Q27638635 | ||
Successful virtual screening for novel inhibitors of human carbonic anhydrase: strategy and experimental confirmation | Q27639470 | ||
Reconstructing the binding site of factor Xa in trypsin reveals ligand-induced structural plasticity | Q27640311 | ||
Virtual screening for submicromolar leads of tRNA-guanine transglycosylase based on a new unexpected binding mode detected by crystal structure analysis | Q27640724 | ||
Understanding protein-ligand interactions: the price of protein flexibility | Q27642968 | ||
ZINC--a free database of commercially available compounds for virtual screening | Q27656255 | ||
Rational design of potent, bioavailable, nonpeptide cyclic ureas as HIV protease inhibitors | Q27731528 | ||
Structure of a non-peptide inhibitor complexed with HIV-1 protease. Developing a cycle of structure-based drug design | Q27731962 | ||
Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings | Q27861111 | ||
Hit and lead generation: beyond high-throughput screening | Q28204526 | ||
Principles of docking: An overview of search algorithms and a guide to scoring functions | Q28217048 | ||
Approaches to the description and prediction of the binding affinity of small-molecule ligands to macromolecular receptors | Q28219491 | ||
Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking | Q28236574 | ||
Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy | Q28251042 | ||
The particle concept: placing discrete water molecules during protein-ligand docking predictions. | Q52214244 | ||
A fast flexible docking method using an incremental construction algorithm. | Q52298930 | ||
Ligand docking to proteins with discrete side-chain flexibility | Q52383197 | ||
DrugScore meets CoMFA: adaptation of fields for molecular comparison (AFMoC) or how to tailor knowledge-based pair-potentials to a particular protein | Q52413367 | ||
A bioavailability score | Q53622895 | ||
Virtual screening using protein-ligand docking: avoiding artificial enrichment | Q53639582 | ||
Fragment-Based Drug Discovery | Q55934078 | ||
How many leads from HTS? | Q56627226 | ||
Current trends in lead discovery: are we looking for the appropriate properties? | Q57017035 | ||
Principles of docking: An overview of search algorithms and a guide to scoring functions | Q57808017 | ||
A new grammar for drug discovery | Q59052529 | ||
Comparative docking studies on ligand binding to the multispecific antibodies IgE-La2 and IgE-Lb4 | Q71699017 | ||
How many leads from HTS? - Comment | Q73396831 | ||
Evaluation of the CASP2 docking section | Q74252620 | ||
From the analyst's couch. Trends in development cycles | Q74468330 | ||
Docking into knowledge-based potential fields: a comparative evaluation of DrugScore | Q78031711 | ||
Expect the unexpected or caveat for drug designers: multiple structure determinations using aldose reductase crystals treated under varying soaking and co-crystallisation conditions | Q80212010 | ||
Incorporating protein flexibility in structure-based drug discovery: using HIV-1 protease as a test case | Q80850175 | ||
Improving binding mode predictions by docking into protein-specifically adapted potential fields | Q81077622 | ||
Virtual exploration of the small-molecule chemical universe below 160 Daltons | Q81327462 | ||
Structure-based drug discovery using GPCR homology modeling: successful virtual screening for antagonists of the alpha1A adrenergic receptor | Q81409742 | ||
Utilising structural knowledge in drug design strategies: applications using Relibase | Q52023426 | ||
Similarity-driven flexible ligand docking | Q52076419 | ||
Knowledge-based scoring function to predict protein-ligand interactions | Q52083236 | ||
Consensus scoring: A method for obtaining improved hit rates from docking databases of three-dimensional structures into proteins | Q52132563 | ||
SuperStar: a knowledge-based approach for identifying interaction sites in proteins | Q52211818 | ||
Structure-based design of nonpeptide inhibitors specific for the human immunodeficiency virus 1 protease | Q28331230 | ||
The art and practice of structure-based drug design: A molecular modeling perspective | Q29029768 | ||
The druggable genome | Q29547361 | ||
Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 2. Enrichment factors in database screening | Q29617343 | ||
FlexE: efficient molecular docking considering protein structure variations. | Q30328164 | ||
Utility of homology models in the drug discovery process. | Q30342415 | ||
Decoys for docking | Q30350781 | ||
A computational procedure for determining energetically favorable binding sites on biologically important macromolecules | Q30406755 | ||
High-throughput docking for lead generation | Q30663788 | ||
Chemical feature-based pharmacophores and virtual library screening for discovery of new leads. | Q30780748 | ||
Comparing Performance of Computational Tools for Combinatorial Library Design | Q30824935 | ||
Detailed analysis of scoring functions for virtual screening | Q30985789 | ||
Druggability indices for protein targets derived from NMR-based screening data | Q30986175 | ||
Pharmacophore modeling and three-dimensional database searching for drug design using catalyst | Q30997393 | ||
McMaster University data-mining and docking competition: computational models on the catwalk | Q31005544 | ||
Experimental screening of dihydrofolate reductase yields a "test set" of 50,000 small molecules for a computational data-mining and docking competition | Q31005550 | ||
DrugScore(CSD)-knowledge-based scoring function derived from small molecule crystal data with superior recognition rate of near-native ligand poses and better affinity prediction | Q31007675 | ||
How does consensus scoring work for virtual library screening? An idealized computer experiment | Q31017163 | ||
Molecular docking and high-throughput screening for novel inhibitors of protein tyrosine phosphatase-1B. | Q31057078 | ||
Validation of an empirical RNA-ligand scoring function for fast flexible docking using Ribodock | Q31112340 | ||
Virtual screening to enrich hit lists from high-throughput screening: a case study on small-molecule inhibitors of angiogenin. | Q31120824 | ||
Molecular recognition and docking algorithms | Q31130825 | ||
Integration of virtual screening into the drug discovery process | Q31134010 | ||
Binding site characteristics in structure-based virtual screening: evaluation of current docking tools | Q31135121 | ||
Docking ligands onto binding site representations derived from proteins built by homology modelling. | Q32181064 | ||
High throughput screening identifies novel inhibitors of Escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase that are competitive with dihydrofolate | Q33187699 | ||
Drug-like annotation and duplicate analysis of a 23-supplier chemical database totalling 2.7 million compounds | Q33199870 | ||
Comparative evaluation of eight docking tools for docking and virtual screening accuracy | Q33206310 | ||
Virtual screening of chemical libraries | Q33209939 | ||
Virtual ligand screening against Escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase: improving docking enrichment using physics-based methods | Q33223542 | ||
Screening for dihydrofolate reductase inhibitors using MOLPRINT 2D, a fast fragment-based method employing the naïve Bayesian classifier: limitations of the descriptor and the importance of balanced chemistry in training and test sets | Q33223543 | ||
Here be dragons: docking and screening in an uncharted region of chemical space | Q33223544 | ||
Comparison of automated docking programs as virtual screening tools | Q33389993 | ||
Docking: successes and challenges | Q33389996 | ||
Isothermal titration calorimetry and differential scanning calorimetry as complementary tools to investigate the energetics of biomolecular recognition | Q33682917 | ||
Accommodating protein flexibility in computational drug design | Q33825095 | ||
A ‘Rule of Three’ for fragment-based lead discovery? | Q33973131 | ||
A geometric approach to macromolecule-ligand interactions | Q34280176 | ||
Testing a flexible-receptor docking algorithm in a model binding site | Q34309041 | ||
Docking and scoring in virtual screening for drug discovery: methods and applications | Q34364227 | ||
Lead discovery using molecular docking | Q34754631 | ||
Structure-based virtual screening: an overview | Q35053155 | ||
Relibase: design and development of a database for comprehensive analysis of protein-ligand interactions | Q35057378 | ||
ADMET in silico modelling: towards prediction paradise? | Q35075770 | ||
Implications of protein flexibility for drug discovery | Q35167908 | ||
Recent development and application of virtual screening in drug discovery: an overview | Q35743496 | ||
Virtual screening methods that complement HTS. | Q35807279 | ||
Fragment-based lead discovery | Q35852295 | ||
Target-biased scoring approaches and expert systems in structure-based virtual screening | Q35853042 | ||
High-throughput docking as a source of novel drug leads | Q35853047 | ||
Virtual screening in lead discovery and optimization. | Q35875498 | ||
Virtual screening in structure-based drug discovery | Q35892808 | ||
Comparing protein-ligand docking programs is difficult. | Q36152993 | ||
Identification of ligands for RNA targets via structure-based virtual screening: HIV-1 TAR. | Q41751942 | ||
Information decay in molecular docking screens against holo, apo, and modeled conformations of enzymes | Q42602259 | ||
Inhibitors of dihydrodipicolinate reductase, a key enzyme of the diaminopimelate pathway of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. | Q43600476 | ||
Automated docking to multiple target structures: incorporation of protein mobility and structural water heterogeneity in AutoDock | Q43825573 | ||
Flexible docking under pharmacophore type constraints | Q44109232 | ||
Docking flexible ligands to macromolecular receptors by molecular shape | Q44113013 | ||
Structural parameterization of the binding enthalpy of small ligands | Q44125121 | ||
Protein-based virtual screening of chemical databases. II. Are homology models of G-Protein Coupled Receptors suitable targets? | Q44242205 | ||
Pharmacophore-based molecular docking to account for ligand flexibility | Q44379444 | ||
Comparative evaluation of 11 scoring functions for molecular docking | Q44457437 | ||
ZZ made EZ: influence of inhibitor configuration on enzyme selectivity. | Q44505963 | ||
Crystallographic study of inhibitors of tRNA-guanine transglycosylase suggests a new structure-based pharmacophore for virtual screening | Q44819422 | ||
Successful virtual screening for a submicromolar antagonist of the neurokinin-1 receptor based on a ligand-supported homology model | Q45104890 | ||
Evaluating the high-throughput screening computations | Q46186021 | ||
Unveiling the full potential of flexible receptor docking using multiple crystallographic structures | Q46563192 | ||
Large-scale validation of a quantum mechanics based scoring function: predicting the binding affinity and the binding mode of a diverse set of protein-ligand complexes | Q46586108 | ||
Molecular docking to ensembles of protein structures | Q46668232 | ||
Modeling water molecules in protein-ligand docking using GOLD. | Q46725683 | ||
A detailed comparison of current docking and scoring methods on systems of pharmaceutical relevance | Q47307422 | ||
Ligand-supported Homology Modelling of Protein Binding-sites using Knowledge-based Potentials | Q47396241 | ||
Assessing scoring functions for protein-ligand interactions | Q47429905 | ||
Probing flexibility and "induced-fit" phenomena in aldose reductase by comparative crystal structure analysis and molecular dynamics simulations | Q47430898 | ||
Chris Lipinski discusses life and chemistry after the Rule of Five | Q48705443 | ||
Feature trees: a new molecular similarity measure based on tree matching | Q51647018 | ||
P433 | issue | 13-14 | |
P304 | page(s) | 580-594 | |
P577 | publication date | 2006-07-01 | |
P13046 | publication type of scholarly work | review article | Q7318358 |
P1433 | published in | Drug Discovery Today | Q3040085 |
P1476 | title | Virtual ligand screening: strategies, perspectives and limitations | |
P478 | volume | 11 |