High methodologic quality but poor applicability: assessment of the AAOS guidelines using the AGREE II instrument

scientific article

High methodologic quality but poor applicability: assessment of the AAOS guidelines using the AGREE II instrument is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P6179Dimensions Publication ID1001841145
P356DOI10.1007/S11999-014-3530-0
P932PMC publication ID4016437
P698PubMed publication ID24566890
P5875ResearchGate publication ID260378645

P50authorThanos AthanasiouQ89313115
P2093author name stringSanjeeve Sabharwal
Ian Holloway
Nirav K Patel
Salman Gauher
P2860cites workShould guidelines incorporate evidence on patient preferences?Q43093816
Multi-level barriers analysis to promote guideline based nursing care: a leadership strategy from home health careQ46161691
Quality of reporting and evidence in American Academy of Pediatrics guidelines.Q53116949
Guidelines in cardiac clinical practice: evaluation of their methodological quality using the AGREE II instrument.Q55312694
AAOS Clinical Practice Guideline: The Treatment of Pediatric Supracondylar Humerus FracturesQ62589489
The trials and tribulations of clinical practice guidelinesQ77816202
Comparison of ACCP and AAOS guidelines for VTE prophylaxis after total hip and total knee arthroplastyQ83125742
AAOS rotator cuff clinical practice guideline misses the markQ84029405
AAOS clinical practice guideline: optimizing the management of rotator cuff problemsQ84236232
Clinical guidelines: potential benefits, limitations, and harms of clinical guidelinesQ33534449
Are guidelines following guidelines? The methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines in the peer-reviewed medical literatureQ33647736
AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health careQ34403979
Quality assessment of asthma clinical practice guidelines: a systematic appraisalQ34602035
Citation of randomized evidence in support of guidelines of therapeutic and preventive interventionsQ34683650
Clinical practice guidelines for treatment of acne vulgaris: a critical appraisal using the AGREE II instrumentQ34909789
A systematic review of appraisal tools for clinical practice guidelines: multiple similarities and one common deficitQ36060297
AASLD clinical practice guidelines: a critical review of scientific evidence and evolving recommendationsQ36185550
Treatment of acute grade III acromioclavicular dislocation: a lack of evidenceQ37131538
Have levels of evidence improved the quality of orthopaedic research?Q37219542
The quality of clinical practice guidelines over the last two decades: a systematic review of guideline appraisal studiesQ37815340
Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluationsQ40618389
American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons clinical practice guideline on: preventing venous thromboembolic disease in patients undergoing elective hip and knee arthroplastyQ41875933
Has payment by results affected the way that English hospitals provide care? Difference-in-differences analysisQ42246003
Variations in health care, patient preferences, and high-quality decision makingQ42342403
NICE clinical guidelines: maybe health economists should participate in guideline developmentQ42393860
Implementing clinical guidelines in stroke: a qualitative study of perceived facilitators and barriers.Q42597854
P2507corrigendum / erratumErratum to: High Methodologic Quality But Poor Applicability: Assessment of the AAOS Guidelines Using The AGREE II Instrument.Q55552297
P433issue6
P407language of work or nameEnglishQ1860
P304page(s)1982-1988
P577publication date2014-02-25
P1433published inClinical Orthopaedics and Related ResearchQ5133783
P1476titleHigh methodologic quality but poor applicability: assessment of the AAOS guidelines using the AGREE II instrument
P478volume472

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q35769120A Systematic Critical Appraisal of Clinical Practice Guidelines in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) Instrument
Q38744604A Systematic Review and Appraisal of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Musculoskeletal Soft Tissue Injuries and Conditions
Q38634848An appraisal of practice guidelines for smoking cessation in people with severe mental illness
Q38949282Appraisal of guidelines for androgenetic alopecia using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II instrument
Q58604611Appraising of the Clinical Practice Guidelines Quality in the Non-Pharmacological Management of Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia; A Review
Q28067463Clinical practice guidelines for the management of neuropathic pain: a systematic review
Q38536613Critical Appraisal of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Q93270647Critical appraisal of papers reporting recommendation on sarcopenia using the AGREE II tool: a EuroAIM initiative
Q36328317Guideline appraisal with AGREE II: Systematic review of the current evidence on how users handle the 2 overall assessments
Q50319654Guideline appraisal with AGREE II: online survey of the potential influence of AGREE II items on overall assessment of guideline quality and recommendation for use.
Q36689543Guidelines on vitamin D replacement in bariatric surgery: Identification and systematic appraisal
Q38741746Improving the adaptability of WHO evidence-informed guidelines for nutrition actions: results of a mixed methods evaluation
Q38383202Nursing Practice Guidelines in China do Need Reform: A Critical Appraisal Using the AGREE II Instrument
Q64971696Quality and utilization of the Finnish clinical practice guideline in schizophrenia: evaluation using AGREE II and the vignette approach.
Q38694187Quality assessment of osteoporosis clinical practice guidelines for physical activity and safe movement: an AGREE II appraisal.
Q60611082Systematic review of clinical practice guidelines in kidney transplantation
Q35241170The development of guideline implementation tools: a qualitative study
Q38607112The quality of European dermatological guidelines: critical appraisal of the quality of EDF guidelines using the AGREE II instrument
Q59126278The quality of guidelines in non-pharmacological prevention and management of chemotherapy-induced neuropathy: A review

Q55552297Erratum to: High Methodologic Quality But Poor Applicability: Assessment of the AAOS Guidelines Using The AGREE II Instrument.main subjectP921

Search more.