Performance of clinical guidelines compared with molecular tumour screening methods in identifying possible Lynch syndrome among colorectal cancer patients: a Norwegian population-based study

scientific article

Performance of clinical guidelines compared with molecular tumour screening methods in identifying possible Lynch syndrome among colorectal cancer patients: a Norwegian population-based study is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P6179Dimensions Publication ID1017252933
P356DOI10.1038/SJ.BJC.6605509
P932PMC publication ID2822943
P698PubMed publication ID20051945
P5875ResearchGate publication ID40850768

P2093author name stringL J Vatten
G Tranø
H H Wasmuth
E Hofsli
W Sjursen
P2860cites workBRAF mutation is frequently present in sporadic colorectal cancer with methylated hMLH1, but not in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancerQ28239788
Carcinogenesis and microsatellite instability: the interrelationship between genetics and epigeneticsQ28253670
A National Cancer Institute Workshop on Microsatellite Instability for cancer detection and familial predisposition: development of international criteria for the determination of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancerQ28289377
Microsatellite instability and MLH1 promoter hypermethylation in colorectal cancerQ28299711
The biochemical basis of microsatellite instability and abnormal immunohistochemistry and clinical behavior in Lynch syndrome: from bench to bedsideQ33762979
Molecular analysis of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer in the United States: high mutation detection rate among clinically selected families and characterization of an American founder genomic deletion of the MSH2 geneQ33904639
Pathology features in Bethesda guidelines predict colorectal cancer microsatellite instability: a population-based studyQ34102606
Accuracy of revised Bethesda guidelines, microsatellite instability, and immunohistochemistry for the identification of patients with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer.Q34414061
Screening for the Lynch syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer).Q34557362
Heritable germline epimutation of MSH2 in a family with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancerQ34563305
BRAF screening as a low-cost effective strategy for simplifying HNPCC genetic testingQ35446668
BRAF mutation is associated with DNA methylation in serrated polyps and cancers of the colorectumQ35596687
Features of colorectal cancers with high-level microsatellite instability occurring in familial and sporadic settings: parallel pathways of tumorigenesisQ35747184
Genetic predisposition to colorectal cancerQ35930688
Hereditary colorectal cancer syndromesQ36158014
Diagnostic approach and management of Lynch syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal carcinoma): a guide for cliniciansQ36548203
Immunohistochemistry versus microsatellite instability testing for screening colorectal cancer patients at risk for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome. Part II. The utility of microsatellite instability testingQ36734614
Guidelines for the clinical management of Lynch syndrome (hereditary non-polyposis cancer).Q36746989
Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer families not complying with the Amsterdam criteria show extremely low frequency of mismatch-repair-gene mutationsQ42037545
Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal carcinoma (HNPCC) and HNPCC-like families: Problems in diagnosis, surveillance, and managementQ47301537
BRAF mutations in colon cancer are not likely attributable to defective DNA mismatch repairQ47617017
Mutations in hMSH6 alone are not sufficient to cause the microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer cell linesQ52828898
Mutations of BRAF are associated with extensive hMLH1 promoter methylation in sporadic colorectal carcinomasQ53373414
Inheritance of a Cancer-AssociatedMLH1Germ-Line EpimutationQ56588356
Incidence of Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer and the Feasibility of Molecular Screening for the DiseaseQ57567959
Identification in Daily Practice of Patients With Lynch Syndrome (Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer): Revised Bethesda Guidelines-Based ApproachVersusMolecular ScreeningQ58408232
Microsatellite marker analysis in screening for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC)Q73963449
Toward a consensus in molecular diagnosis of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (Lynch syndrome)Q79803580
Decoding hereditary colorectal cancerQ79810701
Identifying Lynch syndrome: we are all responsibleQ81747619
Awareness of heredity in colorectal cancer patients is insufficient among clinicians: a Norwegian population-based studyQ84029354
P433issue3
P407language of work or nameEnglishQ1860
P921main subjectcolorectal carcinomaQ25493920
colorectal cancerQ188874
Lynch syndromeQ783644
P304page(s)482-488
P577publication date2010-01-05
P1433published inBritish Journal of CancerQ326309
P1476titlePerformance of clinical guidelines compared with molecular tumour screening methods in identifying possible Lynch syndrome among colorectal cancer patients: a Norwegian population-based study
P478volume102

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q38364721A massive parallel sequencing workflow for diagnostic genetic testing of mismatch repair genes
Q35469854Applying public health screening criteria: how does universal newborn screening compare to universal tumor screening for Lynch syndrome in adults with colorectal cancer?
Q36041678Colorectal cancer survivors' interest in genetic testing for hereditary cancer: implications for universal tumor screening
Q34289520Current clinical criteria for Lynch syndrome are not sensitive enough to identify MSH6 mutation carriers
Q54377350Differential diagnostics of hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes. The role of pathology
Q43052904Discrimination of patients with microsatellite instability colon cancer using 1H HR MAS MR spectroscopy and chemometric analysis
Q46042535Evaluation of predictive models in daily practice for the identification of patients with Lynch syndrome
Q38205339Familial colorectal cancer type X: genetic profiles and phenotypic features.
Q44449817Identification of metastasis-associated microRNAs in serum from rectal cancer patients.
Q36993526Long-Term Outcome and Prognostic Factors of Sporadic Colorectal Cancer in Young Patients: A Large Institutional-Based Retrospective Study
Q37994931Lynch or Not Lynch? Is that Always a Question?
Q82989175Lynch syndrome: genetics and surgery
Q37892037Management of young onset colorectal cancer: divergent practice in the East of England
Q45172873Multidisciplinary management of colorectal cancer enhances access to multimodal therapy and compliance with National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines
Q43453576Patient and tumor characteristics may raise clinicians' awareness of familial colorectal cancer: A Norwegian population-based study
Q83821808Simplified identification of Lynch syndrome: A prospective, multicenter study
Q64259739Small RNA expression from viruses, bacteria and human miRNAs in colon cancer tissue and its association with microsatellite instability and tumor location
Q35063442Tumor mismatch repair immunohistochemistry and DNA MLH1 methylation testing of patients with endometrial cancer diagnosed at age younger than 60 years optimizes triage for population-level germline mismatch repair gene mutation testing.
Q89326750Validation of a targeted next-generation sequencing approach to detect mismatch repair deficiency in colorectal adenocarcinoma

Search more.