Efficacy of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Alone, FSH + Luteinizing Hormone, Human Menopausal Gonadotropin or FSH + Human Chorionic Gonadotropin on Assisted Reproductive Technology Outcomes in the "Personalized" Medicine Era: A Meta-analysis.

scientific article

Efficacy of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Alone, FSH + Luteinizing Hormone, Human Menopausal Gonadotropin or FSH + Human Chorionic Gonadotropin on Assisted Reproductive Technology Outcomes in the "Personalized" Medicine Era: A Meta-analysis. is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.3389/FENDO.2017.00114
P932PMC publication ID5451514
P698PubMed publication ID28620352

P50authorDaniele SantiQ55979669
Carlo AlviggiQ56959712
P2093author name stringManuela Simoni
Livio Casarini
P2860cites workRecombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone produces more oocytes with a lower total dose per cycle in assisted reproductive technologies compared with highly purified human menopausal gonadotrophin: a meta-analysisQ21245540
Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonists for assisted reproductive technologyQ24185849
Comparison of different stimulation protocols used in in vitro fertilization: a reviewQ26799866
Individualization of controlled ovarian stimulation in IVF using ovarian reserve markers: from theory to practiceQ26829747
Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?Q27860973
The lutropin/choriogonadotropin receptor, a 2002 perspectiveQ28214215
The Lutropin/Choriogonadotropin Receptor, A 2002 PerspectiveQ29030892
A randomized clinical trial to determine optimal infertility treatment in older couples: the Forty and Over Treatment Trial (FORT-T).Q33932756
LH and hCG action on the same receptor results in quantitatively and qualitatively different intracellular signallingQ34447333
A review of luteinising hormone and human chorionic gonadotropin when used in assisted reproductive technologyQ34875744
Comparison of recombinant human luteinising hormone (r-hLH) and human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) in assisted reproductive technologyQ35124852
GnRH agonist versus GnRH antagonist in ovarian stimulation: the influence of body mass index on in vitro fertilization outcomeQ80507876
Why is the clinical acceptance of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist cotreatment during ovarian hyperstimulation for in vitro fertilization so slow?Q81838930
Low-dose human chorionic gonadotropin may improve in vitro fertilization cycle outcomes in patients with low luteinizing hormone levels after gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist administrationQ84757841
Hormonal, functional and genetic biomarkers in controlled ovarian stimulation: tools for matching patients and protocols.Q35822351
Differential response to sustained stimulation by hCG & LH on goat ovarian granulosa cellsQ35838695
Differential effects of estrogen and progesterone on development of primate secondary follicles in a steroid-depleted milieu in vitro.Q35865970
Differences in Signal Activation by LH and hCG are Mediated by the LH/CG Receptor's Extracellular Hinge RegionQ36098101
LH in the follicular phase: neither too high nor too low.Q36494664
GnRH analogues in the prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndromeQ36957480
Endometrial morphology and modulation of hormone receptors during ovarian stimulation for assisted reproductive technology cyclesQ37160432
Costs of achieving live birth from assisted reproductive technology: a comparison of sequential single and double embryo transfer approachesQ37444447
GnRH agonist versus GnRH antagonist in ovarian stimulation: an ongoing debateQ38062967
Cryopreservation of human embryos and its contribution to in vitro fertilization success ratesQ38217050
Ovarian stimulation in ART - Unwinding pressing issuesQ38350818
Efficacy and safety of follitropin alfa/lutropin alfa in ART: a randomized controlled trial in poor ovarian respondersQ38381555
A pilot study of the use of low dose human menopausal gonadotropin in ovulation inductionQ38520109
Trends in 'poor responder' research: lessons learned from RCTs in assisted conceptionQ38722378
β-arrestins regulate gonadotropin receptor-mediated cell proliferation and apoptosis by controlling different FSHR or LHCGR intracellular signaling in the hGL5 cell lineQ38753034
Interactions between androgens, FSH, anti-Müllerian hormone and estradiol during folliculogenesis in the human normal and polycystic ovary.Q38938581
Cumulative live birth rates after one ART cycle including all subsequent frozen-thaw cycles in 1050 women: secondary outcome of an RCT comparing GnRH-antagonist and GnRH-agonist protocolsQ38994475
Conventional ovarian stimulation and single embryo transfer for IVF/ICSI. How many oocytes do we need to maximize cumulative live birth rates after utilization of all fresh and frozen embryos?Q40151006
Lyophilised hMG versus rFSH in women with unexplained infertility undergoing a controlled ovarian stimulation with intrauterine insemination: a prospective, randomised study.Q43154108
Modulation of folliculogenesis and steroidogenesis in women by graded menotrophin administrationQ44085087
Recombinant human LH supplementation during GnRH antagonist administration in IVF/ICSI cycles: a prospective randomized studyQ44932557
Advantages of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone over human menopausal gonadotropin for ovarian stimulation in intrauterine insemination: a randomized clinical trial in unexplained infertility.Q45127841
A randomized clinical trial to evaluate optimal treatment for unexplained infertility: the fast track and standard treatment (FASTT) trial.Q45967067
Differences between lutropin-mediated and choriogonadotropin-mediated receptor activationQ46725788
Absence of exon 10 of the human luteinizing hormone (LH) receptor impairs LH, but not human chorionic gonadotropin actionQ47937885
What is the optimum maximal gonadotropin dosage used in microdose flare-up cycles in poor responders?Q48003610
IVF stimulation: protocols for poor respondersQ48603228
Association between the number of eggs and live birth in IVF treatment: an analysis of 400 135 treatment cyclesQ48673616
Effectiveness of highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin vs. recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone in first-cycle in vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection patientsQ48786073
Highly purified hMG versus recombinant FSH plus recombinant LH in intrauterine insemination cycles in women ≥35 years: a RCT.Q50612787
Exogenous luteinizing hormone in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for assisted reproduction techniques.Q50668333
A prospective randomized noninferiority study comparing recombinant FSH and highly purified menotropin in intrauterine insemination cycles in couples with unexplained infertility and/or mild-moderate male factor.Q51655479
Best practices of ASRM and ESHRE: a journey through reproductive medicineQ56979817
Follicle-stimulating hormone potentiates the steroidogenic activity of chorionic gonadotropin and the anti-apoptotic activity of luteinizing hormone in human granulosa-lutein cells in vitroQ61855531
Induction of follicular growth, ovulation and luteinization in the human ovaryQ66846655
Differential Binding Affinities of Rat Testis Luteinizing Hormone (LH) Receptors for Human Chorionic Gonadotropin, Human LH, and Ovine LHQ72886625
Crosstalk Among Multiple Signaling Pathways Controlling Ovarian Cell DeathQ78168522
P921main subjectmeta-analysisQ815382
P304page(s)114
P577publication date2017-06-01
P1433published inFrontiers in EndocrinologyQ27723680
P1476titleEfficacy of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Alone, FSH + Luteinizing Hormone, Human Menopausal Gonadotropin or FSH + Human Chorionic Gonadotropin on Assisted Reproductive Technology Outcomes in the "Personalized" Medicine Era: A Meta-analysis
P478volume8