| scholarly article | Q13442814 |
| P2093 | author name string | R Booy | |
| R Viner | |||
| J Tully | |||
| N Ninis | |||
| P2860 | cites work | Ethics committees: impediments to research or guardians of ethical standards? | Q36905821 |
| Local research ethics committees' approval in a national population study | Q38926864 | ||
| Local research ethics committees. Widely differing responses to a national survey protocol | Q40658776 | ||
| Ethical review of multi-centre research: a survey of multi-centre researchers in the South Thames region. | Q53573026 | ||
| Ethical review of multi-centre research: a survey of local research ethics committees in the south Thames region. | Q53573030 | ||
| Ethical review of research in the NHS: the need for change. | Q53573032 | ||
| P433 | issue | 7243 | |
| P407 | language of work or name | English | Q1860 |
| P921 | main subject | research ethics | Q1132684 |
| multicenter clinical trial | Q6934595 | ||
| ethics committee | Q59057226 | ||
| P304 | page(s) | 1179-1182 | |
| P577 | publication date | 2000-04-01 | |
| P1433 | published in | The BMJ | Q546003 |
| P1476 | title | The new system of review by multicentre research ethics committees: prospective study | |
| P478 | volume | 320 |
| Q48425712 | "It's no skin off my nose": why people take part in qualitative research |
| Q37352991 | A Study of Assessing Errors and Completeness of Research Application Forms Submitted to Instituitional Ethics Committee (IEC) of a Tertiary Care Hospital |
| Q36490902 | A study to assess completeness of project application forms submitted to Institutional Ethics Committees (IEC) of a tertiary care hospital |
| Q47378174 | A tale of two studies: research governance issues arising from two ethnographic investigations into the organisation of health and social care |
| Q34423016 | Aboriginal health research in the remote Kimberley: an exploration of perceptions, attitudes and concerns of stakeholders |
| Q36722629 | Assessment of the ethical review process for non-pharmacological multicentre studies in Germany on the basis of a randomised surgical trial |
| Q59151584 | Bypassing bureaucracy to answer important questions quickly |
| Q36505153 | Centralized and non-centralized ethics review: a five nation study |
| Q30485236 | Clinical governance and research ethics as barriers to UK low-risk population-based health research? |
| Q43154813 | Clinical research by GPs in their own practices |
| Q53486159 | Clinical trials in Italy: focus on the protocols submitted to ethics committees. |
| Q36505148 | Concept paper: a virtual centralized IRB system |
| Q53112821 | Considerations for ethics in multisite research in paediatric palliative care. |
| Q36711655 | Differences between research ethics committees |
| Q35422796 | Ethical approval for research involving geographically dispersed subjects: unsuitability of the UK MREC/LREC system and relevance to uncommon genetic disorders |
| Q58666024 | Ethical challenges of informed consent in prehospital research |
| Q48351212 | Ethical considerations in clinical trials: a critique of the ICH-GCP guideline |
| Q34991646 | Ethical review of health service research in the UK: implications for nursing. |
| Q36051177 | Ethics application protocols for multicentre clinical studies in Canada: A paediatric rheumatology experience |
| Q35650146 | Ethics board review of biomedical processes: improving the process |
| Q36296836 | Ethics committee reviews and mutual acceptance: a pilot study |
| Q58665890 | Ethics on the floor |
| Q33645906 | Ethics review as a component of institutional approval for a multicentre continuous quality improvement project: the investigator's perspective |
| Q43124341 | Ethics review roulette: what can we learn? |
| Q33787682 | Industry-sponsored pharmaceutical trials and research ethics boards: are they cloaked in too much secrecy? |
| Q34337195 | Institutional review boards and multisite studies in health services research: is there a better way? |
| Q38032268 | Is mandatory research ethics reviewing ethical? |
| Q92196020 | Learning to Regulate Learning Healthcare Systems |
| Q42787109 | Multicentre research ethics committees: has the cure been worse than the disease? No, but idiosyncracies and obstructions to good research must be removed |
| Q35429903 | Multicentre trials review process by research ethics committees in Spain: where do they stand before implementing the new European regulation? |
| Q35988150 | Nature and extent of changes in the patient's information sheets of international multicentre clinical trials as requested by Spanish Research Ethics Committees |
| Q34925500 | New governance arrangements for research ethics committees: is facilitating research achieved at the cost of participants' interest |
| Q39666075 | Observational study of 353 applications to London multicentre research ethics committee 1997-2000 |
| Q35850806 | Obstacles to conducting epidemiological research in the UK general population |
| Q40561717 | Pharmaceutical industry's barriers and preferences to conduct clinical drug trials in Finland: a qualitative study |
| Q36505143 | Reforming the oversight of multi-site clinical research: a review of two possible solutions |
| Q46141056 | Regional ethics organizations for protection of human research participants |
| Q57384717 | Research ethics committees in the UK--the pressure is now on research and development departments |
| Q34407928 | Risk and protective factors for meningococcal disease in adolescents: matched cohort study |
| Q36505156 | The Canadian agency for the oversight of research involving humans: a reform proposal |
| Q79775141 | The influence of maternity units' intrapartum intervention rates and midwives' risk perception for women suitable for midwifery-led care |
| Q34536394 | The quality and characteristics of clinical drug study notifications reviewed by the regulatory agency in Finland |
| Q35951857 | Trust and confidence: towards mutual acceptance of ethics committee approval of multicentre studies |
| Q37455114 | U. S. Health Researchers Review their Ethics Review Boards: A Qualitative Study |
| Q35582904 | US and UK policies governing research with humans |
| Q35077277 | Undergraduate research involving human subjects should not be granted ethical approval unless it is likely to be of publishable quality |
| Q91843639 | Using evidence when planning for trial recruitment: An international perspective from time-poor trialists |
| Q30949747 | Using patient-identifiable data for epidemiological research |
| Q34076286 | Variation among institutional review boards in evaluating the design of a multicenter randomized trial |
| Q33840944 | What Do Ethical Guidelines for Epidemiology Say About an Ethics Review? A Qualitative Systematic Review |
| Q58666171 | [Unified report from committes on Ethics and Clinical Investigations in multicenter trials] |
Search more.