| P2093 | author name string | Kirsten Howard | |
| | Deborah Turnbull | |
| | Karen Gerard | |
| | Chris Wilkinson | |
| | Pamela Adelson | |
| | Robert Bryce | |
| P2860 | cites work | Different methods for the induction of labour in outpatient settings | Q24236606 |
| | Outpatient versus inpatient induction of labour for improving birth outcomes | Q24241495 |
| | Low-dose oral misoprostol for induction of labor: a systematic review | Q33401204 |
| | Outpatient Foley catheter versus inpatient prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour: a randomised trial. | Q34565446 |
| | Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature | Q37973704 |
| | Women's preferences for aspects of labor management: results from a discrete choice experiment | Q39270915 |
| | Differences in preferences for obstetric care between nulliparae and their partners in the Netherlands: a discrete-choice experiment | Q39277017 |
| | Assessing women's preferences for intrapartum care | Q39409225 |
| | Conjoint analysis applications in health--a checklist: a report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force | Q39739727 |
| | Conducting discrete choice experiments to inform healthcare decision making: a user's guide. | Q40071854 |
| | Things are Looking up Since We Started Listening to Patients: Trends in the Application of Conjoint Analysis in Health 1982-2007. | Q42722125 |
| | A randomised controlled trial of outpatient compared with inpatient cervical ripening with prostaglandin E₂ (OPRA study). | Q43410729 |
| | A randomized controlled trial of outpatient versus inpatient labour induction with vaginal controlled-release prostaglandin-E2: effectiveness and satisfaction | Q44291623 |
| | The impact of outpatient priming for induction of labour on midwives' work demand, work autonomy and satisfaction. | Q44561086 |
| | A cost analysis of inpatient compared with outpatient prostaglandin E2 cervical priming for induction of labour: results from the OPRA trial | Q46982431 |
| | Psychosocial outcomes of a randomized controlled trial of outpatient cervical priming for induction of labor. | Q47903097 |
| | Are women's expectations and preferences for intrapartum care affected by the model of care on offer? | Q50146551 |
| | Status quo bias in decision making | Q55880112 |
| | How information about other people's personal experiences can help with healthcare decision-making: A qualitative study | Q57312081 |
| | How personal experiences feature in women’s accounts of use of information for decisions about antenatal diagnostic testing for foetal abnormality | Q57312082 |
| | Models of intrapartum care and women’s trade-offs in remote and rural Scotland: a mixed-methods study | Q57468707 |
| | Efficacy of outpatient induction with low-dose intravaginal prostaglandin E2: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial | Q71025373 |
| | A cost-minimization analysis of intracervical prostaglandin E2 for cervical ripening in an outpatient versus inpatient setting | Q71703296 |
| | Outpatient cervical ripening with intravaginal misoprostol | Q73103623 |
| | A prospective study of induction of labor with prostaglandin vaginal gel: ambulatory versus in-patient administration | Q73432021 |
| | Prostaglandin E2 cervical ripening without subsequent induction of labor | Q77947809 |
| | Inpatient versus outpatient cervical priming for induction of labour: therapeutic landscapes and women's preferences | Q83029050 |
| P304 | page(s) | 330 | |
| P577 | publication date | 2014-07-30 | |
| P1433 | published in | BMC Health Services Research | Q4835946 |
| P1476 | title | Women's preferences for inpatient and outpatient priming for labour induction: a discrete choice experiment | |
| P478 | volume | 14 | |