| scholarly article | Q13442814 |
| P50 | author | Sarah Boysen | Q16135589 |
| P2093 | author name string | Berntson GG | |
| Gary G. Berntson | |||
| P433 | issue | 1 | |
| P921 | main subject | chimpanzee | Q4126704 |
| P304 | page(s) | 82-86 | |
| P577 | publication date | 1995-01-01 | |
| P1433 | published in | Journal of Experimental Psychology | Q6295181 |
| P1476 | title | Responses to quantity: Perceptual versus cognitive mechanisms in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) | |
| Responses to quantity: perceptual versus cognitive mechanisms in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). | |||
| P478 | volume | 21 |
| Q28709515 | 1 < 2 and 2 < 3: non-linguistic appreciations of numerical order |
| Q28754363 | A natural history of the human mind: tracing evolutionary changes in brain and cognition |
| Q38421066 | A reversed-reward contingency task reveals causal knowledge in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). |
| Q52652161 | Abstraction promotes creative problem-solving in rhesus monkeys. |
| Q82923151 | Accepting loss: the temporal limits of reciprocity in brown capuchin monkeys |
| Q47786046 | Autonomy in chimpanzees |
| Q28729133 | Bears "Count" Too: Quantity Estimation and Comparison in Black Bears (Ursus Americanus) |
| Q31106113 | Brown lemurs (Eulemur fulvus) can master the qualitative version of the reverse-reward contingency |
| Q51886870 | Can lemurs (Eulemur fulvus and E. macaco) use abstract representations of quantities to master the reverse-reward contingency task? |
| Q33851732 | Can monkeys make investments based on maximized pay-off? |
| Q37494936 | Can nonhuman primates use tokens to represent and sum quantities? |
| Q40431146 | Can squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus) plan for the future? Studies of temporal myopia in food choice |
| Q37147712 | Capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) let lesser rewards pass them by to get better rewards |
| Q41964746 | Chimpanzee Cognitive Control. |
| Q38667360 | Chimpanzee food preferences, associative learning, and the origins of cooking |
| Q37281861 | Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) can wait, when they choose to: a study with the hybrid delay task |
| Q36906567 | Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) transfer tokens repeatedly with a partner to accumulate rewards in a self-control task |
| Q46329118 | Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) use markers to monitor the movement of a hidden item |
| Q39420104 | Chimpanzees can point to smaller amounts of food to accumulate larger amounts but they still fail the reverse-reward contingency task. |
| Q36598229 | Chimpanzees play the ultimatum game |
| Q37678586 | Chimpanzees sometimes see fuller as better: judgments of food quantities based on container size and fullness |
| Q46153613 | Chimpanzees, cooking, and a more comparative psychology |
| Q46562528 | Comparing species decisions in a dichotomous choice task: adjusting task parameters improves performance in monkeys. |
| Q51895985 | Conceptualization of above and below relationships by an insect. |
| Q28651591 | Defining value through quantity and quality-Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) undervalue food quantities when items are broken |
| Q36777502 | Delay discounting: Pigeon, rat, human--does it matter? |
| Q51801336 | Delaying gratification for food and tokens in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): when quantity is salient, symbolic stimuli do not improve performance. |
| Q30524687 | Development of maze navigation by tufted capuchins (Cebus apella). |
| Q61781234 | Do capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) use tokens as symbols? |
| Q28712002 | Does the stimulus type influence horses' performance in a quantity discrimination task? |
| Q56890038 | Dynamic Human-Centered Communication Systems Theory |
| Q30502275 | Evolutionary foundations of human prosocial sentiments. |
| Q35006640 | Evolving the ingredients for reciprocity and spite |
| Q47378366 | Expertise and the evolution of consciousness |
| Q27303921 | Exploring Differences in Dogs' and Wolves' Preference for Risk in a Foraging Task |
| Q42377301 | Fish perform like mammals and birds in inhibitory motor control tasks |
| Q34116981 | Great apes' risk-taking strategies in a decision making task |
| Q37288155 | How is chimpanzee self-control influenced by social setting? |
| Q26995491 | Information processing in decision-making systems |
| Q55475132 | Intuitive optics: what great apes infer from mirrors and shadows. |
| Q36103546 | Language-trained chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) delay gratification by choosing token exchange over immediate reward consumption |
| Q58744991 | Long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis) can use simple heuristics but fail at drawing statistical inferences from populations to samples |
| Q52119308 | Maintenance of self-imposed delay of gratification by four chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and an orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus). |
| Q36443882 | Memory and foraging theory: Chimpanzee utilization of optimality heuristics in the rank-order recovery of hidden foods |
| Q49970954 | Mice learn to avoid the rat race |
| Q30500945 | Monkeys (macaca mulatta and cebus apella) and human adults and children (homo sapiens) compare subsets of moving stimuli based on numerosity. |
| Q34771296 | On loss aversion in capuchin monkeys |
| Q27301078 | Preference transitivity and symbolic representation in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) |
| Q38855298 | Primate cognition: attention, episodic memory, prospective memory, self-control, and metacognition as examples of cognitive control in nonhuman primates |
| Q36372768 | Prospective Memory in a Language-Trained Chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes). |
| Q36041459 | Psychobiology and social psychology: past, present, and future |
| Q50707345 | Quantity estimation and comparison in western lowland gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla). |
| Q30459552 | Quantity judgments of auditory and visual stimuli by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). |
| Q33654363 | Reaching around barriers: the performance of the great apes and 3-5-year-old children |
| Q30499380 | Representational format determines numerical competence in monkeys |
| Q51912959 | Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) select Arabic numerals or visual quantities corresponding to a number of sequentially completed maze trials. |
| Q36689572 | Smoke and mirrors: Testing the scope of chimpanzees' appearance-reality understanding |
| Q46751426 | Social inhibitory control in five lemur species. |
| Q52078546 | Spontaneous number representation in semi-free-ranging rhesus monkeys. |
| Q35170983 | Spontaneous prosocial choice by chimpanzees |
| Q35208437 | Summation of large numerousness by newborn chicks |
| Q34556825 | Tests of inferential reasoning by exclusion in Clark's nutcrackers (Nucifraga columbiana). |
| Q43925341 | The choice to access outdoor areas affects the behavior of great apes |
| Q26823006 | The evolutionary roots of human decision making |
| Q36704218 | The hybrid delay task: can capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) sustain a delay after an initial choice to do so? |
| Q53481140 | The rewarding effects of number and surface area of food in rats. |
| Q56636499 | The role of numerical competence in a specialized predatory strategy of an araneophagic spider |
| Q50793163 | Time preferences in long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis) and humans (Homo sapiens). |
| Q51899344 | Tokens improve capuchin performance in the reverse-reward contingency task. |
| Q35018402 | Too good to be true: rhesus monkeys react negatively to better-than-expected offers |
| Q48473717 | Tool use as situated cognition |
| Q36436794 | Trading up: chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) show self-control through their exchange behavior. |
| Q48181424 | Two is better than one, but mine is better than ours: Preschoolers’ executive function during co-play |
| Q36224418 | What do Arabic numerals mean to macaques (Macaca mulatta)? |
| Q51949165 | When in doubt, chimpanzees rely on estimates of past reward amounts. |
| Q34441263 | When less is more: evolutionary origins of the affect heuristic |
| Q37396972 | When less is more: like humans, chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) misperceive food amounts based on plate size |
| Q34981881 | When maths trumps logic: probabilistic judgements in chimpanzees |
| Q92982606 | Why has evolution not selected for perfect self-control? |
| Q30423819 | Young children have a specific, highly robust bias to trust testimony |
Search more.