| scholarly article | Q13442814 |
| P2093 | author name string | Harris A | |
| Baum JD | |||
| Redshaw ME | |||
| P2860 | cites work | Diversity in the practice of district ethics committees | Q35719369 |
| Guidelines for local research ethics committees | Q35821277 | ||
| Ethics approval for a national postal survey: recent experience | Q36905812 | ||
| Cross district comparison of applications to research ethics committees | Q36905814 | ||
| Ethics committees: impediments to research or guardians of ethical standards? | Q36905821 | ||
| Evaluating the work of ethical review committees: an observation and a suggestion | Q38543152 | ||
| The role of local research ethics committees | Q42764714 | ||
| Too many ethical committees | Q43172483 | ||
| Towards a national bioethics committee | Q43175115 | ||
| Local research ethics committees. Report of the 2nd National Conference | Q54059437 | ||
| Local research ethics committees: hindrance or help? | Q58680012 | ||
| The trouble with ethics committees | Q58680958 | ||
| P433 | issue | 2 | |
| P921 | main subject | research ethics | Q1132684 |
| research ethics committee | Q56515878 | ||
| ethics committee | Q59057226 | ||
| ethics interoperability | Q107638224 | ||
| P304 | page(s) | 78-82 | |
| P577 | publication date | 1996-04-01 | |
| P1433 | published in | Journal of Medical Ethics | Q6295527 |
| P1476 | title | Research ethics committee audit: differences between committees | |
| P478 | volume | 22 |
| Q47378174 | A tale of two studies: research governance issues arising from two ethnographic investigations into the organisation of health and social care |
| Q33289257 | An eight-year follow-up national study of medical school and general hospital ethics committees in Japan |
| Q30485236 | Clinical governance and research ethics as barriers to UK low-risk population-based health research? |
| Q53486159 | Clinical trials in Italy: focus on the protocols submitted to ethics committees. |
| Q36711655 | Differences between research ethics committees |
| Q35422796 | Ethical approval for research involving geographically dispersed subjects: unsuitability of the UK MREC/LREC system and relevance to uncommon genetic disorders |
| Q33819362 | Ethical issues in the development of new agents |
| Q37983910 | Ethical review from the inside: repertoires of evaluation in Research Ethics Committee meetings |
| Q36978794 | Innovations in the Ethical Review of Health-Related Quality Improvement and Research: The Alberta Research Ethics Community Consensus Initiative (ARECCI). |
| Q24807396 | International variation in ethics committee requirements: comparisons across five Westernised nations |
| Q58672902 | Multicentre research ethics committees: have they helped? |
| Q34761985 | Needs assessment to strengthen capacity in water and sanitation research in Africa: experiences of the African SNOWS consortium |
| Q33677131 | Performance of research ethics committees in Spain. A prospective study of 100 applications for clinical trial protocols on medicines |
| Q35071555 | Regulatory and ethical principles in research involving children and individuals with developmental disabilities |
| Q38084172 | Research ethics committee auditing: the experience of a university hospital |
| Q57384717 | Research ethics committees in the UK--the pressure is now on research and development departments |
| Q33713431 | Research ethics committees: a regional approach |
| Q24815381 | Research ethics committees: agents of research policy? |
| Q53105815 | Research governance delays for a multicentre non-interventional study. |
| Q33270364 | The structure and function of research ethics committees in Africa: a case study. |
| Q34076286 | Variation among institutional review boards in evaluating the design of a multicenter randomized trial |
| Q58666171 | [Unified report from committes on Ethics and Clinical Investigations in multicenter trials] |
Search more.