| Q57045952 | Are mechanical and chemical trauma the reason of meatal stenosis after newborn circumcision? |
| Q49579785 | Canadian Urological Association guideline on the care of the normal foreskin and neonatal circumcision in Canadian infants (full version). |
| Q42258800 | Catheterization without foreskin retraction |
| Q37630319 | Early infant male circumcision: Systematic review, risk-benefit analysis, and progress in policy |
| Q41997912 | Effect of preputial type on bacterial colonization and wound healing in boys undergoing circumcision |
| Q40592906 | Flushing of the vagina and the prepuce-a cause for contaminated urine cultures in children |
| Q56626326 | Foreskin development in 10 421 Chinese boys aged 0–18 years |
| Q24632493 | Gairdner was wrong |
| Q26799572 | Histological Correlates of Penile Sexual Sensation: Does Circumcision Make a Difference? |
| Q24671744 | Immunological functions of the human prepuce |
| Q78487460 | Meatus tightly covered by the prepuce is associated with urinary infection |
| Q36248491 | Medical aspects of male circumcision |
| Q64105403 | Microbiology of smegma: Prospective comparative control study |
| Q24679684 | Pathologic and physiologic phimosis: approach to the phimotic foreskin |
| Q55043272 | Phimosis and topical steroids: new clinical findings. |
| Q34301416 | Phimosis in children |
| Q98771795 | The Penile Microbiota in Uncircumcised and Circumcised Men: Relationships With HIV and Human Papillomavirus Infections and Cervicovaginal Microbiota |
| Q55047180 | Topical steroid application versus circumcision in pediatric patients with phimosis: a prospective randomized placebo controlled clinical trial. |
| Q94355714 | Triple incision to treat phimosis in children: an alternative to circumcision |
| Q37482411 | Urologic Diseases in Korean Military Population: a 6-year Epidemiological Review of Medical Records |
| Q42409998 | Visibility of the urethral meatus and risk of urinary tract infections in uncircumcised boys |