Meta-regression models to address heterogeneity and inconsistency in network meta-analysis of survival outcomes

scientific article

Meta-regression models to address heterogeneity and inconsistency in network meta-analysis of survival outcomes is …
instance of (P31):
meta-analysisQ815382
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P6179Dimensions Publication ID1022104644
P356DOI10.1186/1471-2288-12-152
P932PMC publication ID3570315
P698PubMed publication ID23043545
P5875ResearchGate publication ID232221797

P50authorJeroen P JansenQ95974394
P2093author name stringShannon Cope
P2860cites workEvaluating novel agent effects in multiple-treatments meta-regressionQ50674589
Interferon-alpha 2a does not improve response or survival when combined with dacarbazine in metastatic malignant melanoma: results of a multi-institutional Australian randomized trial.Q51050316
Addressing between-study heterogeneity and inconsistency in mixed treatment comparisons: Application to stroke prevention treatments in individuals with non-rheumatic atrial fibrillationQ51835764
Meta-regression detected associations between heterogeneous treatment effects and study-level, but not patient-level, factorsQ51990048
Bayesian measures of model complexity and fitQ56532420
Using mixed treatment comparisons and meta-regression to perform indirect comparisons to estimate the efficacy of biologic treatments in rheumatoid arthritisQ57995927
Treatment of metastatic malignant melanoma with dacarbazine plus tamoxifenQ68217218
Multicenter randomized trial of dacarbazine alone or in combination with two different doses and schedules of interferon alfa-2a in the treatment of advanced melanomaQ72348198
Phase III multicenter randomized trial of the Dartmouth regimen versus dacarbazine in patients with metastatic melanomaQ73181804
Network meta-analysis for indirect treatment comparisonsQ74720205
Network meta-analysis of parametric survival curvesQ85348089
Fotemustine compared with dacarbazine in patients with disseminated malignant melanoma: a phase III studyQ28250432
Randomized phase III study of temozolomide versus dacarbazine in the treatment of patients with advanced metastatic malignant melanomaQ28378420
Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisonsQ29619499
Network meta-analysis of individual and aggregate level dataQ30969336
Phase II randomized study of dacarbazine, carmustine, cisplatin and tamoxifen versus dacarbazine alone in advanced melanoma patients.Q33337168
Network meta-analysis of survival data with fractional polynomialsQ33891529
Simultaneous comparison of multiple treatments: combining direct and indirect evidence.Q34081552
Enhanced secondary analysis of survival data: reconstructing the data from published Kaplan-Meier survival curvesQ34148380
Survival analysis for economic evaluations alongside clinical trials--extrapolation with patient-level data: inconsistencies, limitations, and a practical guideQ34557762
Phase III trial of dacarbazine versus dacarbazine with interferon alpha-2b versus dacarbazine with tamoxifen versus dacarbazine with interferon alpha-2b and tamoxifen in patients with metastatic malignant melanoma: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology GrQ34747181
Evidence synthesis for decision making 3: heterogeneity--subgroups, meta-regression, bias, and bias-adjustmentQ36991744
A case study of multiple-treatments meta-analysis demonstrates that covariates should be consideredQ37373846
Conducting indirect-treatment-comparison and network-meta-analysis studies: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: part 2.Q37888895
Synthesis of survival and disease progression outcomes for health technology assessment of cancer therapiesQ38523764
Prospective randomized comparison of dacarbazine (DTIC) versus DTIC plus interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) in metastatic melanomaQ43874888
Improved results with the addition of interferon alfa-2b to dacarbazine in the treatment of patients with metastatic malignant melanomaQ44191317
Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorialQ44735204
Directed acyclic graphs can help understand bias in indirect and mixed treatment comparisonsQ44749793
Interpreting Indirect Treatment Comparisons and Network Meta-Analysis for Health-Care Decision Making: Report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: Part 1Q46894544
P275copyright licenseCreative Commons Attribution 2.0 GenericQ19125117
P6216copyright statuscopyrightedQ50423863
P921main subjectmeta-analysisQ815382
heterogeneityQ928498
meta-regressionQ6822263
P304page(s)152
P577publication date2012-10-08
P1433published inBMC Medical Research MethodologyQ15752152
P1476titleMeta-regression models to address heterogeneity and inconsistency in network meta-analysis of survival outcomes
P478volume12

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q30967736A multivariate model for the meta-analysis of study level survival data at multiple times
Q33830562A process for assessing the feasibility of a network meta-analysis: a case study of everolimus in combination with hormonal therapy versus chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer
Q93136489An indirect treatment comparison of the efficacy of pembrolizumab versus competing regimens for the adjuvant treatment of stage III melanoma
Q38520487Assessing key assumptions of network meta-analysis: a review of methods
Q58116045Assessing the consistency assumptions underlying network meta-regression using aggregate data
Q36100127Assumptions of Mixed Treatment Comparisons in Health Technology Assessments - Challenges and Possible Steps for Practical Application
Q38662083Bayesian one-step IPD network meta-analysis of time-to-event data using Royston-Parmar models.
Q93161498Comparison of ventilatory modes to facilitate liberation from mechanical ventilation: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
Q96162477Effects of antidepressant medicines on preventing relapse of unipolar depression: a pooled analysis of parametric survival curves
Q36046918Efficacy of limited fluid resuscitation in patients with hemorrhagic shock: a meta-analysis
Q49996939Evaluation of biomarkers for treatment selection using individual participant data from multiple clinical trials
Q30694964Existing trial data do not support that hydroxyethyl starch is less harmful when given on more 'correct' indications
Q38436829Fluid type and the use of renal replacement therapy in sepsis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Q30251972GetReal in network meta-analysis: a review of the methodology
Q93059837Integrating expert opinion with clinical trial data to extrapolate long-term survival: a case study of CAR-T therapy for children and young adults with relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia
Q47161643Multiple Score Comparison: a network meta-analysis approach to comparison and external validation of prognostic scores
Q53747880Network Meta-analysis of Progression-Free Survival and Overall Survival in First-Line Treatment of BRAF Mutation-Positive Metastatic Melanoma
Q38418984Network Meta-analysis: Users' Guide for Surgeons: Part I - Credibility
Q38418988Network Meta-analysis: Users' Guide for Surgeons: Part II - Certainty
Q38667868Network meta-analysis including treatment by covariate interactions: Consistency can vary across covariate values
Q35602850Network meta-analysis of longitudinal data using fractional polynomials
Q35034895Poor prognosis of phosphatase of regenerating liver 3 expression in gastric cancer: a meta-analysis
Q35056525Quantitative summaries of treatment effect estimates obtained with network meta-analysis of survival curves to inform decision-making
Q28651174Simultaneous Comparison of Efficacy and Tolerability of Second-Generation Antipsychotics in Schizophrenia: Mixed-Treatment Comparison Analysis Based on Head-to-Head Trial Data
Q35914125Treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a network meta-analysis
Q89172310Using Evidence from Randomised Controlled Trials in Economic Models: What Information is Relevant and is There a Minimum Amount of Sample Data Required to Make Decisions?

Search more.