| scholarly article | Q13442814 |
| P356 | DOI | 10.1111/J.1744-1609.2012.00290.X |
| P953 | full work available at URL | https://journals.lww.com/10.1111/j.1744-1609.2012.00290.x |
| P698 | PubMed publication ID | 23173665 |
| P50 | author | Jos Kleijnen | Q28037365 |
| P2093 | author name string | Julie Harker | |
| P2860 | cites work | Medicinal use of potato-derived products: conclusions of a rapid versus full systematic review | Q82621449 |
| A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies | Q130237766 | ||
| Systematic reviews can be produced and published faster | Q24289441 | ||
| Treatments for fatigue in multiple sclerosis: a rapid and systematic review | Q28143680 | ||
| A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of debriding agents in treating surgical wounds healing by secondary intention | Q30662718 | ||
| Liquid-based cytology in cervical screening: a rapid and systematic review. | Q33912802 | ||
| The use and impact of rapid health technology assessments. | Q33995092 | ||
| Expediting systematic reviews: methods and implications of rapid reviews. | Q34036655 | ||
| A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer | Q34133344 | ||
| The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of temozolomide for the treatment of recurrent malignant glioma: a rapid and systematic review | Q34255498 | ||
| Effectiveness of autologous chondrocyte transplantation for hyaline cartilage defects in knees: a rapid and systematic review. | Q34258261 | ||
| The role of specialist nurses in multiple sclerosis: a rapid and systematic review. | Q34352987 | ||
| Simple pooling versus combining in meta-analysis | Q74426293 | ||
| P433 | issue | 4 | |
| P407 | language of work or name | English | Q1860 |
| P304 | page(s) | 397-410 | |
| P577 | publication date | 2012-12-01 | |
| P1433 | published in | International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare | Q15751614 |
| P1476 | title | What is a rapid review? A methodological exploration of rapid reviews in Health Technology Assessments | |
| P478 | volume | 10 |
| Q60935679 | A Rapid Process for Identifying and Prioritizing Technology-Based Tools for Health System Implementation |
| Q47134546 | A rapid review to identify physical activity accrued while playing golf |
| Q42659073 | A set of systematic reviews to help reduce inappropriate prescribing to older people: study protocol. |
| Q38450008 | Advancing knowledge of rapid reviews: an analysis of results, conclusions and recommendations from published review articles examining rapid reviews |
| Q39151295 | Ask Me! self-reported features of adolescents experiencing neglect or emotional maltreatment: a rapid systematic review. |
| Q35687361 | Automated confidence ranked classification of randomized controlled trial articles: an aid to evidence-based medicine |
| Q35942317 | Can Systematic Reviews Inform GMO Risk Assessment and Risk Management? |
| Q42378864 | Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group to play a leading role in guiding the production of informed high-quality, timely research evidence syntheses |
| Q48550201 | Contemporary evidence-based practice in Canadian emergency medical services: a vision for integrating evidence into clinical and policy decision-making |
| Q38977207 | DEFINING RAPID REVIEWS: A MODIFIED DELPHI CONSENSUS APPROACH. |
| Q37188802 | Designing a rapid response program to support evidence-informed decision-making in the Americas region: using the best available evidence and case studies |
| Q38945667 | Developing WHO rapid advice guidelines in the setting of a public health emergency |
| Q93131653 | Evidence available for patient-identified priorities in depression research: results of 11 rapid responses |
| Q47133147 | Examining Factors of Engagement With Digital Interventions for Weight Management: Rapid Review. |
| Q37347182 | Expediting evidence synthesis for healthcare decision-making: exploring attitudes and perceptions towards rapid reviews using Q methodology |
| Q38628393 | Exploration and practice of methods and processes of evidence-based rapid review on peer review of WHO EML application |
| Q37704850 | Five shared decision-making tools in 5 months: use of rapid reviews to develop decision boxes for seniors living with dementia and their caregivers. |
| Q30491745 | Housing First and harm reduction: a rapid review and document analysis of the US and Canadian open-access literature. |
| Q36276258 | How to conduct systematic reviews more expeditiously? |
| Q61799691 | Identifying Brief Message Content for Interventions Delivered via Mobile Devices to Improve Medication Adherence in People With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Rapid Systematic Review |
| Q37560869 | Implications of applying methodological shortcuts to expedite systematic reviews: three case studies using systematic reviews from agri-food public health |
| Q28084440 | Is there a relationship between surgical case volume and mortality in congenital heart disease services? A rapid evidence review |
| Q36215944 | Methods for Developing Evidence Reviews in Short Periods of Time: A Scoping Review |
| Q30383894 | Quality of conduct and reporting in rapid reviews: an exploration of compliance with PRISMA and AMSTAR guidelines. |
| Q38592987 | Rapid Review Summit: an overview and initiation of a research agenda |
| Q57808967 | Rapid methods including network meta-analysis to produce evidence in clinical decision support: a decision analysis |
| Q55456403 | Rapid response in health technology assessment: a Delphi study for a Brazilian guideline. |
| Q30642721 | Rapid review programs to support health care and policy decision making: a descriptive analysis of processes and methods |
| Q38180837 | Rapid review: an emerging approach to evidence synthesis in health technology assessment |
| Q90746868 | Recent developments in the intervention of specific phobia among adults: a rapid review |
| Q38129122 | Reviewing the Evidence to Inform the Population of Cost-Effectiveness Models within Health Technology Assessments |
| Q59330138 | Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach |
| Q38495319 | The Development and Use of Evidence Summaries for Point of Care Information Systems: A Streamlined Rapid Review Approach. |
| Q24570593 | The application of knowledge synthesis methods in agri-food public health: recent advancements, challenges and opportunities |
| Q64922798 | The effect of screen advertising on children's dietary intake: A systematic review and meta-analysis. |
| Q36113531 | The use of rapid review methods in health technology assessments: 3 case studies |
| Q34468686 | Tools to support evidence-informed public health decision making |
| Q35975279 | Translating Evidence-Based Dementia Caregiving Interventions into Practice: State-of-the-Science and Next Steps |
| Q36165515 | USING THE AMSTAR CHECKLIST FOR RAPID REVIEWS: IS IT FEASIBLE? |
| Q47650311 | Understanding acceptability of and engagement with Web-based interventions aiming to improve quality of life in cancer survivors: A synthesis of current research |
| Q39036278 | Using rapid reviews: an example from a study conducted to inform policy-making. |
| Q35158748 | Value of databases other than medline for rapid health technology assessments |
| Q28074678 | What are the best methodologies for rapid reviews of the research evidence for evidence-informed decision making in health policy and practice: a rapid review |
| Q26851342 | What evidence is there for a relationship between organisational features and patient outcomes in congenital heart disease services? A rapid review |
| Q28078291 | What is an evidence map? A systematic review of published evidence maps and their definitions, methods, and products |
Search more.