| scholarly article | Q13442814 |
| P2093 | author name string | Cor G M I Baeten | |
| Dominique E N M de Hoog | |||
| Jan Willem M Greve | |||
| Jeroen Heemskerk | |||
| Nicole D Bouvy | |||
| Wim G van Gemert | |||
| P2860 | cites work | Laparoscopic suture rectopexy without resection is effective treatment for full-thickness rectal prolapse | Q33926753 |
| Surgical robotics and laparoscopic training drills | Q34303742 | ||
| Management of recurrent rectal prolapse: surgical approach influences outcome | Q36390490 | ||
| Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication: a comparative retrospective study on costs and time consumption | Q36743499 | ||
| A comparison of open vs. laparoscopic abdominal rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse: a meta-analysis | Q42660880 | ||
| Long-term outcome after laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal prolapse: a case-control study | Q42676492 | ||
| Long-term outcome of laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for total rectal prolapse | Q43316012 | ||
| Abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Influence of surgical technique on functional outcome | Q43327773 | ||
| Early recovery after abdominal rectopexy with multimodal rehabilitation | Q43351578 | ||
| Treatment of rectal prolapse in the elderly by perineal rectosigmoidectomy | Q45074337 | ||
| Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse | Q45711255 | ||
| Qualitative and quantitative analysis of the learning curve of a simulated surgical task on the da Vinci system. | Q47231152 | ||
| Closed rectopexy with transanal resection for complete rectal prolapse in adults | Q48788132 | ||
| Randomized clinical trial of robot-assisted versus laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. | Q50114338 | ||
| Advantages of advanced laparoscopic systems. | Q51250159 | ||
| Long-term follow-up of the modified Delorme procedure for rectal prolapse. | Q51298134 | ||
| Robotic assisted rectopexy. | Q51725697 | ||
| Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic skills: is there a difference in the learning curve? | Q52037209 | ||
| Laparoscopic treatment of rectal prolapse: experience gained in a prospective multicenter study. | Q53867214 | ||
| Functional results after laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse. | Q53894037 | ||
| Robot-assisted vs laparoscopic adrenalectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial | Q61866772 | ||
| Classic articles in colonic and rectal surgery. Edmond Delorme 1847-1929. On the treatment of total prolapse of the rectum by excision of the rectal mucous membranes or recto-colic | Q69899784 | ||
| Abdominal resection rectopexy versus Delorme's procedure for rectal prolapse: comparison of clinical and physiological outcomes | Q71696347 | ||
| Open vs. laparoscopic surgery for rectal prolapse: a case-controlled study assessing short-term outcome | Q73101533 | ||
| Abdominal resection rectopexy versus Delorme's procedure for rectal prolapse: a predictable outcome | Q73251068 | ||
| Functional results two years after laparoscopic rectopexy | Q74561278 | ||
| Treatment of extensive prolapse of the rectum in aged or debilitated patients | Q76137452 | ||
| Prosthetic rectopexy to the pelvic floor and sigmoidectomy for rectal prolapse | Q77383584 | ||
| Laparoscopic rectopexy according to Wells | Q77905331 | ||
| Rectal prolapse: which surgical option is appropriate? | Q79743494 | ||
| Laparoscopically-assisted resection rectopexy for rectal prolapse: ten years' experience | Q81564525 | ||
| Robotic-assisted pelvic organ prolapse surgery | Q81824804 | ||
| P433 | issue | 11 | |
| P407 | language of work or name | English | Q1860 |
| P921 | main subject | rectal prolapse | Q2062483 |
| P304 | page(s) | 1825-1830 | |
| P577 | publication date | 2007-11-01 | |
| P1433 | published in | Diseases of the Colon & Rectum | Q15731527 |
| P1476 | title | Robot-assisted vs. conventional laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a comparative study on costs and time | |
| P478 | volume | 50 |
| Q79614535 | A comparison of costs for abdominal, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted sacral colpopexy |
| Q51831942 | A detailed analysis of the learning curve: robotic hysterectomy and pelvic-aortic lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer. |
| Q35219320 | Are costs of robot-assisted surgery warranted for gynecological procedures? |
| Q35935616 | Commentary: Robotic vs. Standard Laparoscopic Technique - What is Better? |
| Q40408428 | Comparison of open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches for total abdominal colectomy |
| Q91871737 | Cost-analysis and quality of life after laparoscopic and robotic ventral mesh rectopexy for posterior compartment prolapse: a randomized trial |
| Q36193705 | Cost-effectiveness of robotic surgery for rectal cancer focusing on short-term outcomes: a propensity score-matching analysis. |
| Q26747567 | Current status of laparoscopic and robotic ventral mesh rectopexy for external and internal rectal prolapse |
| Q51887861 | Current status of robotic colorectal surgery. |
| Q47405709 | Day case robotic ventral rectopexy compared with day case laparoscopic ventral rectopexy: a prospective study |
| Q51199501 | Early experience with robotic rectopexy. |
| Q37945105 | Economic evaluation of da Vinci-assisted robotic surgery: a systematic review |
| Q39787869 | Efficacy and cost of robotic hepatectomy: is the robot cost-prohibitive? |
| Q89540280 | Essential advances in surgical and adjuvant therapies for colorectal cancer 2018-2019 |
| Q38266166 | European Association of Endoscopic Surgeons (EAES) consensus statement on the use of robotics in general surgery |
| Q38515140 | Is robotic ventral mesh rectopexy better than laparoscopy in the treatment of rectal prolapse and obstructed defecation? A meta-analysis |
| Q43361832 | Is robotic-assisted ventral mesh rectopexy superior to laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy in the management of obstructed defaecation? |
| Q51136016 | Long-term outcome of robotic-assisted laparoscopic rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse in elderly patients. |
| Q26738794 | Minimally Invasive Surgery for the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer |
| Q39263955 | Minimally invasive ventral mesh rectopexy for complex rectocoele: impact on anorectal and sexual function |
| Q38620093 | Most common robotic bariatric procedures: review and technical aspects |
| Q38368052 | Opportunity cost in the economic evaluation of da Vinci robotic assisted surgery |
| Q41512804 | Optimizing Treatment for Rectal Prolapse |
| Q38185289 | Outcomes of robotic-assisted colorectal surgery compared with laparoscopic and open surgery: a systematic review. |
| Q38172412 | Rectal prolapse: an overview of clinical features, diagnosis, and patient-specific management strategies. |
| Q37322114 | Recurrence and functional results after open versus conventional laparoscopic versus robot-assisted laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a case-control study |
| Q50926515 | Robot-assisted vs laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for external or internal rectal prolapse and enterocele: a randomized controlled trial. |
| Q38926621 | Robotic Colorectal Surgery: Advance or Expense? |
| Q51528395 | Robotic TransAnal Minimally Invasive Surgery in a cadaveric model. |
| Q35986345 | Robotic colorectal surgery: a systematic review |
| Q46869817 | Robotic revisional bariatric surgery: a comparative study with laparoscopic and open surgery. |
| Q92464415 | Robotic surgery for colorectal disease: review of current port placement and future perspectives |
| Q38741480 | Robotic surgery: disruptive innovation or unfulfilled promise? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the first 30 years |
| Q46504742 | Robotic ventral mesh rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a single-institution experience |
| Q47124415 | Robotic ventral rectopexy: Initial experience in an Indian tertiary health-care centre and review of literature |
| Q39978271 | Robotic versus laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy of liver |
| Q44313016 | Robotic vs. conventional laparoscopic gastric banding: a comparison of 407 cases |
| Q43361026 | Robotic-assisted and laparoscopic ventral rectopexy in the treatment of rectal prolapse: a matched-pairs study of operative details and complications |
| Q28079254 | Robotics in Colorectal Surgery |
| Q28066368 | Robotics in general surgery: A systematic cost assessment |
| Q38553046 | SAGES TAVAC safety and effectiveness analysis: da Vinci ® Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA). |
| Q42668560 | Short-term outcome of laparoscopic versus robotic ventral mesh rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse. Is robotic superior? |
| Q39381210 | Standardized surgical technique and dedicated operating room environment can reduce the operative time during robotic-assisted surgery for pelvic floor disorders |
| Q58557205 | Surgical options and trends in treating rectal prolapse: long-term results in a 19-year follow-up study |
| Q37978795 | The Italian Society of Colo-Rectal Surgery Annual Report 2010: an educational review |
| Q51141414 | The end of robot-assisted laparoscopy? A critical appraisal of scientific evidence on the use of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery. |
| Q57805891 | Use of the Xi robotic platform for total abdominal colectomy: a step forward in minimally invasive colorectal surgery |
| Q35948198 | Ventral rectopexy for rectal prolapse and obstructed defecation |
Search more.