| scholarly article | Q13442814 |
| P819 | ADS bibcode | 2013PLoSO...858674S |
| P356 | DOI | 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0058674 |
| P8608 | Fatcat ID | release_juktp65jyzgsnbbalb4i7bkwxe |
| P932 | PMC publication ID | 3604006 |
| P698 | PubMed publication ID | 23527005 |
| P5875 | ResearchGate publication ID | 236078816 |
| P50 | author | Mirjam Kretzschmar | Q30105752 |
| Marianne Ab van der Sande | Q58805340 | ||
| Christian Hoebe | Q59680609 | ||
| G. Ardine de Wit | Q60669638 | ||
| Hannelore Martha Götz | Q73185632 | ||
| Boris V. Schmid | Q41049937 | ||
| P2093 | author name string | Eelco A B Over | |
| Eline L M Op de Coul | |||
| Ingrid V F van den Broek | |||
| Jan E A M van Bergen | |||
| Johan S A Fennema | |||
| P2860 | cites work | Effectiveness of yearly, register based screening for chlamydia in the Netherlands: controlled trial with randomised stepped wedge implementation | Q28727534 |
| Systematic screening for Chlamydia trachomatis: estimating cost-effectiveness using dynamic modeling and Dutch data | Q31030842 | ||
| Population prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in the Netherlands. Should asymptomatic persons be tested during population-based Chlamydia screening also for gonorrhoea or only if chlamydial infection is found? | Q33235710 | ||
| Evaluation design of a systematic, selective, internet-based, Chlamydia screening implementation in the Netherlands, 2008-2010: implications of first results for the analysis | Q33550587 | ||
| Trends in sexually transmitted infections in the Netherlands, combining surveillance data from general practices and sexually transmitted infection centers. | Q33582776 | ||
| Rationale, design, and results of the first screening round of a comprehensive, register-based, Chlamydia screening implementation programme in the Netherlands | Q33711642 | ||
| Transmission of Chlamydia trachomatis through sexual partnerships: a comparison between three individual-based models and empirical data | Q33926596 | ||
| The web of human sexual contacts. | Q33952386 | ||
| Usefulness of primary care electronic networks to assess the incidence of chlamydia, diagnosed by general practitioners | Q33955823 | ||
| Keeping participants on board: increasing uptake by automated respondent reminders in an Internet-based chlamydia screening in the Netherlands | Q34190197 | ||
| Sexual behaviour in Britain: partnerships, practices, and HIV risk behaviours | Q57586552 | ||
| Determinants of sexual network structure and their impact on cumulative network measures | Q34262970 | ||
| Azithromycin versus doxycycline for genital chlamydial infections: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials | Q34828264 | ||
| Establishing the National Chlamydia Screening Programme in England: results from the first full year of screening | Q35531491 | ||
| A prediction rule for selective screening of Chlamydia trachomatis infection | Q35572993 | ||
| Prevalence of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis increases significantly with level of urbanisation and suggests targeted screening approaches: results from the first national population based study in the Netherlands. | Q35573013 | ||
| Modelling the effectiveness of chlamydia screening in England | Q36928670 | ||
| Repeated Chlamydia trachomatis genital infections in adolescent women | Q37468218 | ||
| Epidemiology of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women and the cost-effectiveness of screening. | Q37614736 | ||
| Effects of screening and partner notification on Chlamydia positivity in the United States: a modeling study | Q37848991 | ||
| Who participates in the Dutch Chlamydia screening? A study on demographic and behavioral correlates of participation and positivity. | Q37849497 | ||
| Systematic selection of screening participants by risk score in a Chlamydia screening programme is feasible and effective | Q37849563 | ||
| The cost and cost-effectiveness of opportunistic screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in Ireland | Q37849574 | ||
| Diagnosis and management of uncomplicated Chlamydia trachomatis infections in adolescents and adults: summary of evidence reviewed for the 2010 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Sexually Transmitted Diseases Treatment Guidelines | Q37849732 | ||
| Transmission dynamics of Chlamydia trachomatis affect the impact of screening programmes | Q37851318 | ||
| Acceptability of the internet-based Chlamydia screening implementation in the Netherlands and insights into nonresponse | Q37851570 | ||
| Prediction of costs, effectiveness, and disease control of a population-based program using home sampling for diagnosis of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis Infections. | Q37862572 | ||
| Comparative model-based analysis of screening programs for Chlamydia trachomatis infections | Q37875008 | ||
| Cost-effectiveness of screening programs for Chlamydia trachomatis: a population-based dynamic approach | Q37875490 | ||
| Opportunistic screening for genital infections with Chlamydia trachomatis among the sexually active population of Amsterdam. Il Over 90% participation and almost 5% prevalence | Q37878441 | ||
| Partner referral by patients with gonorrhea and chlamydial infection. Case-finding observations | Q37882551 | ||
| Modeling prevention strategies for gonorrhea and Chlamydia using stochastic network simulations | Q37884688 | ||
| A population based dynamic approach for estimating the cost effectiveness of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis | Q43061695 | ||
| Questioning azithromycin for chlamydial infection | Q43411789 | ||
| Sexually transmitted infection health-care seeking behaviour in the Netherlands: general practitioner attends to the majority of sexually transmitted infection consultations | Q44384288 | ||
| P275 | copyright license | Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International | Q20007257 |
| P6216 | copyright status | copyrighted | Q50423863 |
| P433 | issue | 3 | |
| P407 | language of work or name | English | Q1860 |
| P921 | main subject | Netherlands | Q55 |
| P304 | page(s) | e58674 | |
| P577 | publication date | 2013-03-20 | |
| P1433 | published in | PLOS One | Q564954 |
| P1476 | title | Effects of population based screening for Chlamydia infections in the Netherlands limited by declining participation rates | |
| P478 | volume | 8 |
| Q37841524 | Chlamydia screening is not cost-effective at low participation rates: evidence from a repeated register-based implementation study in The Netherlands. |
| Q31017547 | Denominators count: supplementing surveillance data for genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection with testing data, Norway, 2007 to 2013. |
| Q35994858 | Disease Burden of 32 Infectious Diseases in the Netherlands, 2007-2011. |
| Q54241824 | Double trouble: modelling the impact of low risk perception and high-risk sexual behaviour on chlamydia transmission. |
| Q37838149 | Exploration of testing practices and population characteristics support an increase in chlamydia positivity in Tasmania between 2001 and 2010. |
| Q37841654 | Identification and risk assessment of Swedish youth at risk of chlamydia. |
| Q59340629 | Study protocol of the iMPaCT project: a longitudinal cohort study assessing psychological determinants, sexual behaviour and chlamydia (re)infections in heterosexual STI clinic visitors |
| Q36343688 | The Netherlands Chlamydia cohort study (NECCST) protocol to assess the risk of late complications following Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women. |
| Q37605881 | The influence of two different invitation letters on Chlamydia testing participation: randomized controlled trial |
Search more.