scholarly article | Q13442814 |
P6179 | Dimensions Publication ID | 1007857944 |
P356 | DOI | 10.3758/BF03193919 |
P698 | PubMed publication ID | 17727115 |
P2093 | author name string | Olivier Corneille | |
James W Tanaka | |||
P2860 | cites work | FFA: a flexible fusiform area for subordinate-level visual processing automatized by expertise | Q28141321 |
Mapping the perceptual magnet effect for speech using signal detection theory and multidimensional scaling | Q28307459 | ||
Domain specificity in face perception | Q33910467 | ||
Pictures and names: making the connection | Q38495754 | ||
Familiarity, memorability, and the effect of typicality on the recognition of faces | Q41109110 | ||
Perceptual learning | Q41718848 | ||
Mapping attractor fields in face space: the atypicality bias in face recognition. | Q52036285 | ||
A Unified Account of the Effects of Distinctiveness, Inversion, and Race in Face Recognition | Q52050586 | ||
Why faces are and are not special: an effect of expertise. | Q52078792 | ||
The effect of race, inversion and encoding activity upon face recognition. | Q52079178 | ||
Typicality and familiarity of faces. | Q52092261 | ||
Human adults and human infants show a “perceptual magnet effect” for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not | Q56061296 | ||
P433 | issue | 4 | |
P304 | page(s) | 619-627 | |
P577 | publication date | 2007-05-01 | |
P1433 | published in | Attention, Perception and Psychophysics | Q15762491 |
P1476 | title | Typicality effects in face and object perception: further evidence for the attractor field model | |
P478 | volume | 69 |
Q44793440 | Development of face discrimination abilities, and relationship to magnocellular pathway development, between childhood and adulthood |
Q51014923 | Effect of adaptor duration on 8-year-olds' facial identity aftereffects suggests adult-like plasticity of the face norm. |
Q50782545 | Experience produces the atypicality bias in object perception. |
Q35051546 | Exploring the perceptual spaces of faces, cars and birds in children and adults |
Q50309609 | Face and object discrimination in autism, and relationship to IQ and age. |
Q51817517 | Holistic processing is tuned for in-group faces. |
Q36011648 | How category structure influences the perception of object similarity: the atypicality bias |
Q33353175 | Linguistically modulated perception and cognition: the label-feedback hypothesis |
Q51874907 | Locating attractiveness in the face space: faces are more attractive when closer to their group prototype. |
Q33567188 | Relating visual to verbal semantic knowledge: the evaluation of object recognition in prosopagnosia |
Q81488071 | The preferred level of face categorization depends on discriminability |
Q61805189 | Toward a New Approach to Cross-Cultural Distinctiveness and Typicality of Human Faces: The Cross-Group Typicality/ Distinctiveness Metric |
Q35088404 | Visual adaptation and face perception |
Q84959893 | What shape are the neural response functions underlying opponent coding in face space? A psychophysical investigation |
Q34674883 | Why Some Faces won't be Remembered: Brain Potentials Illuminate Successful Versus Unsuccessful Encoding for Same-Race and Other-Race Faces. |
Search more.