Screening mammography: proven benefit, continued controversy

scientific article

Screening mammography: proven benefit, continued controversy is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814
review articleQ7318358

External links are
P356DOI10.1016/S0033-8389(01)00015-X
P698PubMed publication ID12117183

P2093author name stringCarol H Lee
P2860cites workAre increasing 5-year survival rates evidence of success against cancer?Q28139089
Cancer statistics, 2001Q28189339
Is screening for breast cancer with mammography justifiable?Q30839166
Variability and accuracy in mammographic interpretation using the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data SystemQ31961935
Earlier detection of breast cancer by surveillance of women at familial riskQ33179978
Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: inter- and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessmentQ33180500
Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast: evolving perspectivesQ33895360
Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammographyQ33910224
Breast cancer risk following irradiation for Hodgkin's diseaseQ33982819
Five‐Hundred Life‐Saving Interventions and Their Cost‐EffectivenessQ34299363
The false-negative mammogramQ34753006
Breast carcinoma in women previously treated for Hodgkin disease: mammographic evaluationQ35229747
Frequency of benign and malignant breast lesions in 207 consecutive autopsies in Australian womenQ35992095
What is the optimum interval between mammographic screening examinations? An analysis based on the latest results of the Swedish two-county breast cancer screening trialQ36028003
The genetics of breast and ovarian cancerQ36081587
US women's attitudes to false positive mammography results and detection of ductal carcinoma in situ: cross sectional surveyQ37339831
Breast cancer screening with mammography: overview of Swedish randomised trialsQ40709256
Effect of false-positive mammograms on interval breast cancer screening in a health maintenance organizationQ40807284
Current perspectives on radiation-induced breast cancerQ41688270
Continuing screening mammography in women aged 70 to 79 years: impact on life expectancy and cost-effectivenessQ41706565
Screening mammography in community practice: positive predictive value of abnormal findings and yield of follow-up diagnostic proceduresQ42672489
Screening mammography beginning at age 40 years: a reappraisal of cost-effectivenessQ43586680
Edinburgh trial of screening for breast cancer: mortality at seven yearsQ43678734
Effect of age, breast density, and family history on the sensitivity of first screening mammographyQ45149178
Cost-effectiveness of extending screening mammography guidelines to include women 40 to 49 years of age.Q46014056
Medical audit of a rapid-throughput mammography screening practice: methodology and results of 27,114 examinations.Q46024630
The comparative value of mammographic screening for women 40-49 years old versus women 50-64 years old.Q46055470
Breast cancer screening outcomes in women ages 40-49: clinical experience with service screening using modern mammography.Q46223217
Efficacy of screening mammography among women aged 40 to 49 years and 50 to 69 years: comparison of relative and absolute benefitQ46467434
The effect of comorbidity on 3-year survival of women with primary breast cancerQ46637774
Is screening mammography effective in elderly women?Q46903696
Breast cancer: age-specific growth rates and screening strategies.Q50571430
Efficacy of breast cancer screening by age. New results from the Swedish Two-County Trial.Q50596721
Mammographic screening in women more than 64 years old: a comparison of 1- and 2-year intervals.Q50629624
Current policies for surveillance and management in women at risk of breast and ovarian cancer: a survey among 16 European family cancer clinics. European Familial Breast Cancer Collaborative Group.Q50638328
Breast carcinoma in women previously treated for Hodgkin's disease: clinical and mammographic findings.Q50652760
False-positive findings in mammography screening induces short-term distress - breast cancer-specific concern prevails longer.Q51080127
Breast screening: the psychological sequelae of false-positive recall in women with and without a family history of breast cancer.Q51091547
Increases in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast in relation to mammography: a dilemma.Q51106992
Psychological and behavioral implications of abnormal mammograms.Q51160123
Improving breast cancer diagnosis with computer-aided diagnosis.Q52227195
Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations.Q52245438
Effects of lead time, length bias, and false-negative assurance on screening for breast cancer.Q52399213
Inter-observer and intra-observer variability of mammogram interpretation: a field study.Q52862132
Variability in radiologists' interpretations of mammograms.Q52881735
Variability in the interpretation of screening mammograms by US radiologists. Findings from a national sample.Q52886814
Breast cancer after treatment of Hodgkin's disease.Q53483025
A private breast imaging practice: medical audit of 25,788 screening and 1,077 diagnostic examinations.Q54038901
UK and USA breast cancer deaths down 25% in year 2000 at ages 20-69 years.Q55033930
Cochrane review on screening for breast cancer with mammography.Q55035487
Bone Mass and the Risk of Breast Cancer among Postmenopausal WomenQ57244921
Screening by mammography, women with a family history of breast cancerQ57266902
Breast cancer screening for elderly women with and without comorbid conditions. A decision analysis modelQ68088754
Improvement in mammography interpretation skills in a community radiology practice after dedicated teaching courses: 2-year medical audit of 38,633 casesQ68162178
Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annuallyQ69396132
Prevalence of benign, atypical, and malignant breast lesions in populations at different risk for breast cancer. A forensic autopsy studyQ69442439
Continued local recurrence of carcinoma 15-25 years after a diagnosis of low grade ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast treated only by biopsyQ71079558
Positive predictive value of breast biopsy performed as a result of mammography: there is no abrupt change at age 50 yearsQ71204192
Precancerous and cancerous breast lesions during lifetime and at autopsy. A study of 83 womenQ71422399
Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project: five-year summary reportQ71605390
Recent trends in U.S. breast cancer incidence, survival, and mortality ratesQ71745914
Effect of human variability on independent double reading in screening mammographyQ71871652
Assessment and counseling for women with a family history of breast cancer. A guide for cliniciansQ72473284
Predicting the cumulative risk of false-positive mammogramsQ73088378
Breast cancer screeningQ73206602
Mammography in 53,803 women from the New Hampshire mammography networkQ73282098
Older women, mammography, and mortality from breast cancerQ73318645
American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of breast cancer: update 1997Q73341374
Benefits and risks of screening mammography in women with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutationsQ73521681
Comparison of the relative incidence of impalpable invasive breast carcinoma and ductal carcinoma in situ in cancers detected in patients older and younger than 50 years of ageQ73551461
Assessing mammographers' accuracy. A comparison of clinical and test performanceQ73795265
The Swedish Two-County Trial twenty years later. Updated mortality results and new insights from long-term follow-upQ74174362
Screening mammography behavior after a false positive mammogramQ74448899
The benefits of mammography are not limited to women of ages older than 50 yearsQ74608079
Estimating the accuracy of screening mammography: a meta-analysisQ74663989
Benefit of screening mammography in women aged 40-49: a new meta-analysis of randomized controlled trialsQ77110822
Variation of benefits and harms of breast cancer screening with ageQ77110860
Nonpalpable breast cancer in women aged 40-49 years: a surgeon's view of benefits from screening mammographyQ77110864
Is there a downside to elderly women undergoing screening mammography?Q77331919
Diagnostic testing following screening mammography in the elderlyQ77331959
Effects of age, breast density, ethnicity, and estrogen replacement therapy on screening mammographic sensitivity and cancer stage at diagnosis: review of 183,134 screening mammograms in Albuquerque, New MexicoQ77528929
Breast cancer screening programmes in 22 countries: current policies, administration and guidelines. International Breast Cancer Screening Network (IBSN) and the European Network of Pilot Projects for Breast Cancer ScreeningQ77636744
P433issue3
P921main subjectmammographyQ324634
P304page(s)395-407
P577publication date2002-05-01
P1433published inRadiologic Clinics of North AmericaQ15755454
P1476titleScreening mammography: proven benefit, continued controversy
P478volume40

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q58646312A Computer-Aided Diagnosis System for Breast Cancer Using Independent Component Analysis and Fuzzy Classifier
Q45932012A comprehensive analysis of DgN(CT) coefficients for pendant-geometry cone-beam breast computed tomography.
Q39850093A model-based framework for the detection of spiculated masses on mammography
Q30417226Assessing the Effectiveness of Breast Cancer Education Workshops among Samoan and Pacific Islander Women in Southern California
Q89622974Assessment of Computer Regulation Thermography (CRT) as a Complemetrary Diagnostic tool for Breast Cancer Patient
Q26853224Barriers in the breast cancer screening and the role of nursing: an integrative review
Q39931265Breast cancer stage at diagnosis and geographic access to mammography screening (New Hampshire, 1998-2004).
Q35551709Breast cancer: new technologies for risk assessment and diagnosis
Q34738193Breast imaging: a breast surgeon's perspective
Q39077785Breast ultrasound image segmentation: a survey
Q37168504Clinical image evaluation of film mammograms in Korea: comparison with the ACR standard.
Q37159317Comparative Multifractal Analysis of Dynamic Infrared Thermograms and X-Ray Mammograms Enlightens Changes in the Environment of Malignant Tumors
Q30471855Computer-aided classification of breast masses: performance and interobserver variability of expert radiologists versus residents
Q36781123Gøtzsche's quixotic antiscreening campaign: nonscientific and contrary to Cochrane principles
Q34767541Identifying geographic disparities in the early detection of breast cancer using a geographic information system
Q37139381Personalizing mammography by breast density and other risk factors for breast cancer: analysis of health benefits and cost-effectiveness
Q35871446Perspectives on behavioral and social science research on cancer screening
Q35112254Screening for breast cancer with MRI
Q39655706Use of mammography screening among older Samoan women in Los Angeles county: a diffusion network approach

Search more.