scholarly article | Q13442814 |
P50 | author | Jennifer Moye | Q58133975 |
P2093 | author name string | Barry Edelstein | |
Ronald J Gurrera | |||
Bret Hicken | |||
Michele J Karel | |||
Jorge C Armesto | |||
P2860 | cites work | Competence to consent to treatment as a psychological construct. | Q51228307 |
The development and piloting of a capacity assessment tool. | Q51965690 | ||
Consistency of physicians' legal standard and personal judgments of competency in patients with Alzheimer's disease. | Q51974391 | ||
Assessment of mental competency in community-dwelling elderly. | Q51983914 | ||
Consistency of physician judgments of capacity to consent in mild Alzheimer's disease. | Q52002642 | ||
Assessing the competency of patients with Alzheimer's disease under different legal standards. A prototype instrument. | Q52013373 | ||
Assessing patients' capacities to consent to treatment. | Q52068098 | ||
Reliability of clinical judgment of patients' competency to give informed consent: a case vignette study. | Q52921836 | ||
Choices, values, and frames. | Q29399004 | ||
Capacity to consent to treatment: empirical comparison of three instruments in older adults with and without dementia | Q34026171 | ||
The Modified Mini-Mental State (3MS) examination | Q34185551 | ||
Enhancing informed consent for research and treatment | Q34237442 | ||
Current state of research on decision-making competence of cognitively impaired elderly persons | Q34582702 | ||
Empirical advances in the assessment of the capacity to consent to medical treatment: clinical implications and research needs. | Q36246964 | ||
Neuropsychologic predictors of competency in Alzheimer's disease using a rational reasons legal standard | Q36683352 | ||
Three methods of assessing values for advance care planning: comparing persons with and without dementia | Q36877399 | ||
Cognitive performance predicts treatment decisional abilities in mild to moderate dementia | Q36906723 | ||
Hopes and Cautions for Instrument-Based Evaluation of Consent Capacity: Results of a Construct Validity Study of Three Instruments | Q37005799 | ||
Cognitive models of physicians' legal standard and personal judgments of competency in patients with Alzheimer's disease | Q38443755 | ||
Toward a neurologic model of competency: Cognitive predictors of capacity to consent in Alzheimer's disease using three different legal standards | Q38461024 | ||
Tests of competency to consent to treatment | Q38566117 | ||
Comprehension of informed consent information by young-old through old-old volunteers | Q39725493 | ||
The values history. The evaluation of the patient's values and advance directives | Q41890850 | ||
Improvements in advance care planning in the Veterans Affairs System: results of a multifaceted intervention | Q45333191 | ||
Factors influencing life-sustaining treatment decisions in a community sample of families. | Q46049314 | ||
Ethnicity and Attitudes Toward Patient Autonomy | Q46165572 | ||
The California Scale of Appreciation: a new instrument to measure the appreciation component of capacity to consent to research | Q46293875 | ||
The psychometric properties of the Competency Interview Schedule. | Q51130968 | ||
The many faces of competency. | Q51223256 | ||
P433 | issue | 3 | |
P921 | main subject | informed consent | Q764527 |
P304 | page(s) | 37-66 | |
P577 | publication date | 2007-03-01 | |
P1433 | published in | Clinical Gerontologist | Q15762196 |
P1476 | title | Assessment of Capacity to Consent to Treatment: Challenges, the "ACCT" Approach, Future Directions | |
P478 | volume | 31 |