Assessment of Capacity to Consent to Treatment: Challenges, the "ACCT" Approach, Future Directions

scientific article

Assessment of Capacity to Consent to Treatment: Challenges, the "ACCT" Approach, Future Directions is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1080/07317110802072140
P932PMC publication ID3074108
P698PubMed publication ID21494573
P5875ResearchGate publication ID51052694

P50authorJennifer MoyeQ58133975
P2093author name stringBarry Edelstein
Ronald J Gurrera
Bret Hicken
Michele J Karel
Jorge C Armesto
P2860cites workCompetence to consent to treatment as a psychological construct.Q51228307
The development and piloting of a capacity assessment tool.Q51965690
Consistency of physicians' legal standard and personal judgments of competency in patients with Alzheimer's disease.Q51974391
Assessment of mental competency in community-dwelling elderly.Q51983914
Consistency of physician judgments of capacity to consent in mild Alzheimer's disease.Q52002642
Assessing the competency of patients with Alzheimer's disease under different legal standards. A prototype instrument.Q52013373
Assessing patients' capacities to consent to treatment.Q52068098
Reliability of clinical judgment of patients' competency to give informed consent: a case vignette study.Q52921836
Choices, values, and frames.Q29399004
Capacity to consent to treatment: empirical comparison of three instruments in older adults with and without dementiaQ34026171
The Modified Mini-Mental State (3MS) examinationQ34185551
Enhancing informed consent for research and treatmentQ34237442
Current state of research on decision-making competence of cognitively impaired elderly personsQ34582702
Empirical advances in the assessment of the capacity to consent to medical treatment: clinical implications and research needs.Q36246964
Neuropsychologic predictors of competency in Alzheimer's disease using a rational reasons legal standardQ36683352
Three methods of assessing values for advance care planning: comparing persons with and without dementiaQ36877399
Cognitive performance predicts treatment decisional abilities in mild to moderate dementiaQ36906723
Hopes and Cautions for Instrument-Based Evaluation of Consent Capacity: Results of a Construct Validity Study of Three InstrumentsQ37005799
Cognitive models of physicians' legal standard and personal judgments of competency in patients with Alzheimer's diseaseQ38443755
Toward a neurologic model of competency: Cognitive predictors of capacity to consent in Alzheimer's disease using three different legal standardsQ38461024
Tests of competency to consent to treatmentQ38566117
Comprehension of informed consent information by young-old through old-old volunteersQ39725493
The values history. The evaluation of the patient's values and advance directivesQ41890850
Improvements in advance care planning in the Veterans Affairs System: results of a multifaceted interventionQ45333191
Factors influencing life-sustaining treatment decisions in a community sample of families.Q46049314
Ethnicity and Attitudes Toward Patient AutonomyQ46165572
The California Scale of Appreciation: a new instrument to measure the appreciation component of capacity to consent to researchQ46293875
The psychometric properties of the Competency Interview Schedule.Q51130968
The many faces of competency.Q51223256
P433issue3
P921main subjectinformed consentQ764527
P304page(s)37-66
P577publication date2007-03-01
P1433published inClinical GerontologistQ15762196
P1476titleAssessment of Capacity to Consent to Treatment: Challenges, the "ACCT" Approach, Future Directions
P478volume31