scholarly article | Q13442814 |
P50 | author | Frederick M. Hecht | Q45955550 |
P2093 | author name string | Michael Acree | |
Tim Carey | |||
Wolf E Mehling | |||
Alice Pressman | |||
Andrew L Avins | |||
Harley Goldberg | |||
Viranjini Gopisetty | |||
P2860 | cites work | Interpreting the clinical importance of treatment outcomes in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations | Q37022616 |
Interpreting change scores for pain and functional status in low back pain: towards international consensus regarding minimal important change. | Q37047795 | ||
Addition of choice of complementary therapies to usual care for acute low back pain: a randomized controlled trial | Q39341025 | ||
Measuring the functional status of patients with low back pain. | Q39489005 | ||
A prognostic approach to defining chronic pain: replication in a UK primary care low back pain population. | Q40203475 | ||
A prognostic approach to defining chronic pain | Q40390323 | ||
Prognosis and quality of life in patients with acute low back pain: insights from a comprehensive inception cohort study | Q40518171 | ||
Predicting poor outcomes for back pain seen in primary care using patients' own criteria | Q40916527 | ||
How little pain and disability do patients with low back pain have to experience to feel that they have recovered? | Q41689253 | ||
What factors influence the measurement properties of the Roland-Morris disability questionnaire? | Q43621506 | ||
Beyond minimally important change: defining a successful outcome of physical therapy for patients with low back pain. | Q45898854 | ||
Recovery: what does this mean to patients with low back pain? | Q45986980 | ||
Identifying important outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: an IMMPACT survey of people with pain | Q48454274 | ||
Psychosocial variables in patients with (sub)acute low back pain: an inception cohort in primary care physical therapy in The Netherlands. | Q50908190 | ||
The importance of symptom duration in determining prognosis. | Q51984854 | ||
Grading the severity of chronic pain | Q52417199 | ||
Three ways to quantify uncertainty in individually applied "minimally important change" values. | Q53100692 | ||
Outcome measures for low back pain research. A proposal for standardized use. | Q53351090 | ||
Comparison of general exercise, motor control exercise and spinal manipulative therapy for chronic low back pain: A randomized trial | Q60679457 | ||
A minimal clinically important difference was derived for the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire for low back pain | Q60681542 | ||
Clinical Course and Prognostic Factors in Acute Low Back Pain | Q60759254 | ||
Responsiveness of functional status in low back pain: a comparison of different instruments | Q71578966 | ||
Classification of low back pain in primary care: using "bothersomeness" to identify the most severe cases | Q81068842 | ||
A primary care back pain screening tool: identifying patient subgroups for initial treatment | Q81158387 | ||
Acute low back pain: systematic review of its prognosis | Q24673571 | ||
Active rehabilitation for chronic low back pain: cognitive-behavioral, physical, or both? First direct post-treatment results from a randomized controlled trial [ISRCTN22714229] | Q25257036 | ||
Rapid magnetic resonance imaging vs radiographs for patients with low back pain: a randomized controlled trial | Q28208384 | ||
Subgrouping low back pain: a comparison of the STarT Back Tool with the Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire | Q33604326 | ||
Predicting who develops chronic low back pain in primary care: a prospective study | Q33623180 | ||
Outcome of low back pain in general practice: a prospective study | Q33785185 | ||
Performance of screening and diagnostic tests. Application of receiver operating characteristic analysis | Q34184470 | ||
Psychosocial Predictors of Outcome in Acute and Subchronic Low Back Trouble | Q34299404 | ||
Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. | Q34363246 | ||
Comparing yoga, exercise, and a self-care book for chronic low back pain: a randomized, controlled trial | Q34478100 | ||
Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference | Q34515517 | ||
Predicting persistent disabling low back pain in general practice: a prospective cohort study | Q35717618 | ||
Value of predictive instruments to determine persisting restriction of function in patients with subacute non-specific low back pain. Systematic review. | Q36421198 | ||
Can we predict poor recovery from recent-onset nonspecific low back pain? A systematic review | Q36893992 | ||
P433 | issue | 26 | |
P407 | language of work or name | English | Q1860 |
P304 | page(s) | 2316-2323 | |
P577 | publication date | 2011-12-01 | |
P1433 | published in | Spine | Q7577526 |
P1476 | title | Acute low back pain and primary care: how to define recovery and chronification? | |
P478 | volume | 36 |
Q36543923 | Can a back pain screening tool help classify patients with acute pain into risk levels for chronic pain? |
Q36253225 | Can screening instruments accurately determine poor outcome risk in adults with recent onset low back pain? A systematic review and meta-analysis |
Q35762687 | Clinical decision rule for primary care patient with acute low back pain at risk of developing chronic pain |
Q64934556 | Early Return to Work Has Benefits for Relief of Back Pain and Functional Recovery After Controlling for Multiple Confounds. |
Q92910581 | Persistent lumbar radicular and low back pain; impact of genetic variability versus emotional distress |
Q53180152 | The added prognostic value of MRI findings for recovery in patients with low back pain in primary care: a 1-year follow-up cohort study. |
Q35910854 | The prognosis of acute low back pain in primary care in the United States: a 2-year prospective cohort study |
Search more.