| scholarly article | Q13442814 |
| P2093 | author name string | Cenk Gurbuz | |
| Turhan Caskurlu | |||
| Asıf Yıldırım | |||
| Ozgur Arikan | |||
| Gokhan Atış | |||
| Onur Danacıoglu | |||
| Ozgur Efilioglu | |||
| P2860 | cites work | The argument against the routine use of ureteral access sheaths. | Q30340981 |
| Frequency of ureteroscope damage seen at a tertiary care center | Q30819378 | ||
| Cost analysis of flexible ureterorenoscopy | Q31061096 | ||
| Performance and safety of holmium: YAG laser optical fibers | Q33227045 | ||
| Cost-effectiveness and efficiency of shockwave lithotripsy vs flexible ureteroscopic holmium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser lithotripsy in the treatment of lower pole renal calculi | Q33858699 | ||
| Decreasing the cost of flexible ureterorenoscopic procedures. | Q33860942 | ||
| Improving flexible ureterorenoscope durability up to 100 procedures | Q34260364 | ||
| Safety and efficacy of ureteral access sheaths | Q36752005 | ||
| Is there a difference in outcomes between digital and fiberoptic flexible ureterorenoscopy procedures? | Q39957408 | ||
| Improving the durability of digital flexible ureteroscopes | Q40096074 | ||
| New-generation flexible ureterorenoscopes are more durable than previous ones | Q40298498 | ||
| Experience with the holmium laser as an endoscopic lithotrite | Q71387780 | ||
| Flexible ureteroscopes: a single center evaluation of the durability and function of the new endoscopes smaller than 9Fr | Q74327829 | ||
| Retrograde intrarenal surgery in patients with horseshoe kidneys | Q86494416 | ||
| P433 | issue | 2 | |
| P304 | page(s) | 155-158 | |
| P577 | publication date | 2013-12-10 | |
| P1433 | published in | Urolithiasis | Q27724667 |
| P1476 | title | The cost analysis of flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy in 302 cases | |
| P478 | volume | 42 |
| Q92522745 | A comprehensive literature-based equation to compare cost-effectiveness of a flexible ureteroscopy program with single-use versus reusable devices |
| Q92950508 | Assessing Cost-Effectiveness of New Technologies in Stone Management |
| Q48194722 | Clinical outcomes and costs of reusable and single-use flexible ureterorenoscopes: a prospective cohort study. |
| Q51683002 | Comparison of flexible ureteroscopy and micropercutaneous nephrolithotomy in terms of cost-effectiveness: analysis of 111 procedures. |
| Q40772540 | Contemporary trends in urinary tract stone surgery, a regional perspective: Auckland, New Zealand |
| Q42566294 | Difference of opinion--In the era of flexible ureteroscopy is there still a place for Shock-wave lithotripsy? Opinion: NO. |
| Q35215383 | Disposable devices for RIRS: where do we stand in 2013? What do we need in the future? |
| Q36290243 | Flexible Ureteroscopy Can Be More Efficacious in the Treatment of Proximal Ureteral Stones in Select Patients |
| Q36456236 | Is semirigid ureteroscopy sufficient in the treatment of proximal ureteral stones? When is combined therapy with flexible ureteroscopy needed? |
| Q47835213 | Pneumatic versus laser ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a comparison of initial outcomes and cost |
| Q41455628 | Retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal stones - Part 2. |
| Q92950436 | Single-Use Ureteroscopes |
| Q48708483 | The economics of stone disease |
| Q40656911 | The new concept of ureteral access sheath with guidewire disengagement: One wire does it all. |
| Q38644599 | Use of ureteral access sheaths in ureteroscopy |
Search more.