scholarly article | Q13442814 |
P2093 | author name string | C Silagy | |
P2860 | cites work | Getting to grips with Archie Cochrane's agenda | Q24679605 |
Perusing the literature: comparison of MEDLINE searching with a perinatal trials database | Q34194687 | ||
A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction | Q35879688 | ||
Underreporting research is scientific misconduct | Q38050046 | ||
Retrospective and prospective identification of unpublished controlled trials: lessons from a survey of obstetricians and pediatricians. | Q52868163 | ||
The Oxford Database of Perinatal Trials: developing a register of published reports of controlled trials | Q68927918 | ||
Registry of Prospective Clinical Trials--Sixth Report | Q70365591 | ||
P433 | issue | 6882 | |
P407 | language of work or name | English | Q1860 |
P921 | main subject | randomized controlled trial | Q1436668 |
P304 | page(s) | 897-900 | |
P577 | publication date | 1993-04-01 | |
P1433 | published in | The BMJ | Q546003 |
P1476 | title | Developing a register of randomised controlled trials in primary care | |
P478 | volume | 306 |
Q31984698 | A review of randomised controlled trials published in Archives of Disease in Childhood from 1982-96 |
Q36729912 | An investigation of the adequacy of MEDLINE searches for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of the effects of mental health care. |
Q34469512 | Applying the results of clinical trials to patients to general practice: perceived problems, strengths, assumptions, and challenges for the future. |
Q40437890 | Avoiding the pitfalls of sponsored multicentre research in general practice |
Q33540400 | Can randomised trials inform clinical decisions about individual patients? |
Q37121661 | Carbapenems versus other beta-lactams in treating severe infections in intensive care: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. |
Q36079975 | Centralised treatment, entry to trials and survival |
Q42636969 | Clinical guidelines in 1994 |
Q38646620 | Content and quality of 2000 controlled trials in schizophrenia over 50 years |
Q47151072 | Critical reading |
Q73586088 | Critical reading using the READER acronym by experienced general practitioners (G.P.s) and by G.P. registrars in southern and Northern Ireland |
Q53341133 | Developing a register for randomized controlled trials in prosthodontics: results of a search from prosthodontic journals published in the United States. |
Q33825754 | Diabetes care in general practice: meta-analysis of randomised control trials |
Q30867897 | Diabetes care: the effectiveness of systems for routine surveillance for people with diabetes |
Q34617682 | Does the evidence referenced in NICE guidelines reflect a primary care population? |
Q40658315 | Epidemiologic evaluation of drug use in children |
Q42851047 | Family medicine research |
Q24245562 | Handsearching versus electronic searching to identify reports of randomized trials |
Q36888457 | Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews |
Q38557756 | In search of controlled evidence for health care quality improvement |
Q36714884 | Knowledge data base system for twins study |
Q40543692 | Primary care management of acute herpes zoster: systematic review of evidence from randomized controlled trials. |
Q42721728 | Randomised controlled trials in general practice |
Q34053204 | Review of 39 years of randomized controlled trials in the British Journal of General Practice |
Q60633060 | Schizophrenia trials: past, present and future |
Q22242108 | Searching the literature. Be systematic in your searching |
Q24241952 | Systems for routine surveillance in people with diabetes mellitus |
Q34469854 | The content and methodology of research papers published in three United Kingdom primary care journals. |
Q34054586 | The science of perpetual change. |
Q42261175 | Usefulness of contacting other experts when conducting literature searches. Secondary citation of work that was not published did not set good example |
Q24815797 | Which resources should be used to identify RCT/CCTs for systematic reviews: a systematic review |