Is single-stage revision according to a strict protocol effective in treatment of chronic knee arthroplasty infections?

scientific article published in January 2015

Is single-stage revision according to a strict protocol effective in treatment of chronic knee arthroplasty infections? is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1007/S11999-014-3721-8
P932PMC publication ID4390922
P698PubMed publication ID24923669
P5875ResearchGate publication ID263096724

P2093author name stringFares Sami Haddad
Mohamed Sukeik
Sulaiman Alazzawi
P2860cites workConsistency of ASA gradingQ28296106
Bone loss with revision total knee arthroplasty: defect classification and alternatives for reconstruction.Q33546461
Prospective evaluation of criteria for microbiological diagnosis of prosthetic-joint infection at revision arthroplasty. The OSIRIS Collaborative Study GroupQ33678576
The treatment of the infected hip replacement. The complex caseQ33804201
Two-stage uncemented revision hip arthroplasty for infectionQ34017106
The PROSTALAC functional spacer in two-stage revision for infected knee replacements. Prosthesis of antibiotic-loaded acrylic cementQ34035244
Results of direct exchange or debridement of the infected total knee arthroplastyQ35002048
Management of infection associated with prosthetic jointsQ35102243
Periprosthetic sepsis.Q35729859
High rate of infection control with one-stage revision of septic knee prostheses excluding MRSA and MRSEQ35858822
Prosthetic-joint infectionsQ35917924
Pre-formed articulating knee spacer in two-stage revision for the infected total knee arthroplastyQ36274562
Antibiotic-impregnated PMMA hip spacers: Current statusQ36575491
Guiding empirical antibiotic therapy in orthopaedics: The microbiology of prosthetic joint infection managed by debridement, irrigation and prosthesis retentionQ36753859
A case for one-stage revision in infected total knee arthroplasty?Q37780862
Developing a strategy to treat established infection in total knee replacement: a review of the latest evidence and clinical practiceQ38021763
The radiological assessment of total and unicompartmental knee replacementsQ38046811
New definition for periprosthetic joint infection: from the Workgroup of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society.Q38592839
The management of bone defects in revision total knee arthroplastyQ41464841
New definition for periprosthetic joint infection.Q43481386
The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring systemQ44236336
Prosthesis retention, serial debridement, and antibiotic bead use for the treatment of infection following total joint arthroplastyQ46080973
Outcome of prosthetic knee-associated infection: evaluation of 40 consecutive episodes at a single centre.Q51216793
Management of infection at the site of a total knee arthroplasty.Q51339175
Mid-term to long-term followup of two-stage reimplantation for infected total knee arthroplasty.Q51584101
Primary exchange revision arthroplasty for infected total knee replacement: a long-term study.Q51677673
Patient satisfaction and functional status after treatment of infection at the site of a total knee arthroplasty with use of the PROSTALAC articulating spacerQ51811168
Patient satisfaction and outcome after septic versus aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty.Q53505241
[Early results of one-stage septic revision arthroplasties with antibiotic-laden cement. A clinical and statistical analysis].Q53860723
One-stage reimplantation for infected total knee arthroplastyQ67732946
Mid- to long-term results after treatment of 118 cases of periprosthetic infections after knee joint replacement using one-stage exchange surgeryQ67951709
Two-stage cementless revision THR after infection. 5 recurrences in 40 cases followed 2.5-7 yearsQ71500792
[One-stage reimplantation for the salvage of total knee arthroplasty complicated by infection]Q73456156
Functional advantage of articulating versus static spacers in 2-stage revision for total knee arthroplasty infectionQ80196448
Outcomes of revision total hip replacement for infection after grading according to a standard protocolQ84961317
Defining peri-prosthetic infection: do we have a workable gold standard?Q85312621
Single stage revision: regaining momentumQ85336826
P433issue1
P407language of work or nameEnglishQ1860
P304page(s)8-14
P577publication date2015-01-01
P1433published inClinical Orthopaedics and Related ResearchQ5133783
P1476titleIs single-stage revision according to a strict protocol effective in treatment of chronic knee arthroplasty infections?
P478volume473