Can obtaining informed consent alter self-reported drinking behaviour? A methodological experiment

scientific article published on 24 April 2015

Can obtaining informed consent alter self-reported drinking behaviour? A methodological experiment is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P6179Dimensions Publication ID1026031351
P356DOI10.1186/S12874-015-0032-Z
P932PMC publication ID4423134
P698PubMed publication ID25907583
P5875ResearchGate publication ID275357238

P2093author name stringJim McCambridge
Patrick Keating
Lambert Felix
P2860cites workUsing informed consent to save trust.Q50624757
On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implicationsQ55953862
Randomized consent designs for clinical trials: an updateQ68568312
Self-report validity issuesQ69404903
What is Zelen's design?Q24524181
CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trialsQ24614759
Effects of anonymity, gender, and erotophilia on the quality of data obtained from self-reports of socially sensitive behaviorsQ24653730
Can simply answering research questions change behaviour? Systematic review and meta analyses of brief alcohol intervention trialsQ26991802
The origins of informed consent: the International Scientific Commission on Medical War Crimes, and the Nuremburg codeQ28203187
A New Design for Randomized Clinical TrialsQ28239541
Statistics notes. Treatment allocation in controlled trials: why randomise?Q33604598
The role of context and timeframe in moderating relationships within the theory of planned behaviourQ33934179
Can research assessments themselves cause bias in behaviour change trials? A systematic review of evidence from solomon 4-group studiesQ34062211
The effects of demand characteristics on research participant behaviours in non-laboratory settings: a systematic reviewQ34314195
Validity and reliability of self-reported drinking behavior: dealing with the problem of response biasQ34364556
RCT of effectiveness of motivational enhancement therapy delivered by nurses for hazardous drinkers in primary care units in ThailandQ35379218
Assessment of factors affecting the validity of self-reported health-risk behavior among adolescents: evidence from the scientific literatureQ35594982
Applying for ethical approval for research in the United KingdomQ37616920
Systematic review of the Hawthorne effect: new concepts are needed to study research participation effectsQ37671448
CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trialsQ37950739
Research participation effects: a skeleton in the methodological cupboardQ38207181
In randomization we trust? There are overlooked problems in experimenting with people in behavioral intervention trialsQ38550754
From question-behaviour effects in trials to the social psychology of research participationQ39141613
Randomized controlled trial of the effects of completing the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test questionnaire on self-reported hazardous drinkingQ39231191
Good clinical practice and informed consent are inseparableQ43017138
Social desirability biases in self-reported alcohol consumption and harmsQ43236902
Test‐Retest Reliability of the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test in a General Population SampleQ44594252
A randomized study of the effect of anonymity, quasi-anonymity, and Certificates of Confidentiality on postpartum women's disclosure of sensitive informationQ46977188
P275copyright licenseCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 InternationalQ20007257
P6216copyright statuscopyrightedQ50423863
P921main subjectinformed consentQ764527
P304page(s)41
P577publication date2015-04-24
P1433published inBMC Medical Research MethodologyQ15752152
P1476titleCan obtaining informed consent alter self-reported drinking behaviour? A methodological experiment
P478volume15

Search more.