Cost-effectiveness analysis of initial HIV treatment under Italian guidelines

scientific article published on 31 October 2011

Cost-effectiveness analysis of initial HIV treatment under Italian guidelines is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.2147/CEOR.S24130
P932PMC publication ID3234156
P698PubMed publication ID22163167

P50authorPierluigi VialeQ113862183
Claudio ViscoliQ114325513
P2093author name stringGiorgio L Colombo
Sergio Di Matteo
Antonio Di Biagio
Vincenzo Colangeli
P2860cites workThe cost effectiveness of combination antiretroviral therapy for HIV disease.Q52067020
Resource utilization and hospital cost of HIV/AIDS care in Italy in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapyQ56835329
Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate, Emtricitabine, and Efavirenz Versus Fixed-Dose Zidovudine/Lamivudine and Efavirenz in Antiretroviral-Naive PatientsQ58000876
Providing antiretroviral therapy for HIV infectionQ73614013
The Lifetime Cost of Current Human Immunodeficiency Virus Care in the United StatesQ22242768
Life expectancy of individuals on combination antiretroviral therapy in high-income countries: a collaborative analysis of 14 cohort studiesQ24597052
Decline in the AIDS and death rates in the EuroSIDA study: an observational studyQ33967061
A cost-effectiveness analysis of different therapies in patients with chronic hepatitis B in ItalyQ35205440
Changing health environment: the challenge to demonstrate cost-effectiveness of new compoundsQ36117463
British HIV Association (BHIVA) guidelines for the treatment of HIV-infected adults with antiretroviral therapy (2006).Q36653838
The combined effect of modern highly active antiretroviral therapy regimens and adherence on mortality over timeQ36712393
Antiretroviral therapy and management of HIV infectionQ37770721
Insights into the reasons for discontinuation of the first highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimen in a cohort of antiretroviral naïve patients. I.CO.N.A. Study Group. Italian Cohort of Antiretroviral-Naïve PatientsQ38959219
Adherence to protease inhibitor therapy and outcomes in patients with HIV infectionQ39605935
One-pill once-a-day HAART: a simplification strategy that improves adherence and quality of life of HIV-infected subjectsQ40729054
Once-daily darunavir/ritonavir vs. lopinavir/ritonavir in treatment-naive, HIV-1-infected patients: 96-week analysisQ42623275
Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, emtricitabine, and efavirenz compared with zidovudine/lamivudine and efavirenz in treatment-naive patients: 144-week analysisQ42635936
Randomized comparison of renal effects, efficacy, and safety with once-daily abacavir/lamivudine versus tenofovir/emtricitabine, administered with efavirenz, in antiretroviral-naive, HIV-1-infected adults: 48-week results from the ASSERT studyQ42658845
Cost effectiveness of darunavir/ritonavir 600/100 mg bid in treatment-experienced, lopinavir-naive, protease inhibitor-resistant, HIV-infected adults in Belgium, Italy, Sweden and the UK.Q42772430
Cost effectiveness of darunavir/ritonavir 600/100 mg bid in protease inhibitor-experienced, HIV-1-infected adults in Belgium, Italy, Sweden and the UK.Q42772436
Raltegravir versus Efavirenz regimens in treatment-naive HIV-1-infected patients: 96-week efficacy, durability, subgroup, safety, and metabolic analysesQ43092892
Once-daily atazanavir/ritonavir compared with twice-daily lopinavir/ritonavir, each in combination with tenofovir and emtricitabine, for management of antiretroviral-naive HIV-1-infected patients: 96-week efficacy and safety results of the CASTLE stQ43208808
Safety and efficacy of raltegravir-based versus efavirenz-based combination therapy in treatment-naive patients with HIV-1 infection: a multicentre, double-blind randomised controlled trialQ43300648
Long-term efficacy and safety of fosamprenavir plus ritonavir versus lopinavir/ritonavir in combination with abacavir/lamivudine over 144 weeks.Q43472229
The cost of HIV disease in Northern Italy: the payer's perspectiveQ43911880
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-matched, multicenter trial of abacavir/lamivudine or tenofovir/emtricitabine with lopinavir/ritonavir for initial HIV treatmentQ44191819
Cost-effectiveness of lopinavir/ritonavir versus nelfinavir as the first-line highly active antiretroviral therapy regimen for HIV infectionQ44509935
Relative prognostic value of self-reported adherence and plasma NNRTI/PI concentrations to predict virological rebound in patients initially responding to HAART.Q44744113
Efficacy and safety of tenofovir DF vs stavudine in combination therapy in antiretroviral-naive patients: a 3-year randomized trialQ44975155
Comparison of Markov model and discrete-event simulation techniques for HIV.Q46103481
Once-daily atazanavir/ritonavir versus twice-daily lopinavir/ritonavir, each in combination with tenofovir and emtricitabine, for management of antiretroviral-naive HIV-1-infected patients: 48 week efficacy and safety results of the CASTLE studyQ46414306
Non-adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy predicts progression to AIDS.Q46667493
Tenofovir DF, emtricitabine, and efavirenz vs. zidovudine, lamivudine, and efavirenz for HIV.Q46900196
P275copyright licenseCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 UnportedQ18810331
P6216copyright statuscopyrightedQ50423863
P407language of work or nameEnglishQ1860
P921main subjectItalyQ38
P304page(s)197-205
P577publication date2011-10-31
P1433published inClinicoEconomics and Outcomes ResearchQ5133862
P1476titleCost-effectiveness analysis of initial HIV treatment under Italian guidelines
P478volume3