Preventing Unintended Pregnancy: The Contraceptive CHOICE Project in Review

scientific article published on 31 March 2015

Preventing Unintended Pregnancy: The Contraceptive CHOICE Project in Review is …
instance of (P31):
review articleQ7318358
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1089/JWH.2015.5191
P932PMC publication ID4441000
P698PubMed publication ID25825986

P50authorTessa MaddenQ60174069
Jeffrey F PeipertQ88186437
Gina M. SecuraQ121033599
P2093author name stringQiuhong Zhao
Natalia E Birgisson
P2860cites workEffectiveness of Long-Acting Reversible ContraceptionQ22250875
Cost effectiveness of contraceptives in the United StatesQ24631004
Family planning as a cost-saving preventive health serviceQ28235983
Abortion and maternal healthQ33540797
Change in sexual behavior with provision of no-cost contraceptionQ33564047
Twenty-four-month continuation of reversible contraceptionQ33574772
Continuation of reversible contraception in teenagers and young womenQ33682251
Characteristics associated with discontinuation of long-acting reversible contraception within the first 6 months of useQ33733137
Reproductive health/family planning and the health of infants, girls and womenQ33894882
The Contraceptive CHOICE Project: reducing barriers to long-acting reversible contraceptionQ34023308
Provision of no-cost, long-acting contraception and teenage pregnancyQ34441219
Changes in use of long-acting contraceptive methods in the United States, 2007-2009.Q36291470
Continuation and satisfaction of reversible contraceptionQ36544339
Structured contraceptive counseling provided by the Contraceptive CHOICE ProjectQ36864173
Long-acting reversible contraception for adolescents and young adults: patient and provider perspectivesQ36901287
Preventing unintended pregnancies by providing no-cost contraceptionQ37724264
Nepal survey shows that "family planning saves lives".Q39627706
Obstetrician-gynecologists' beliefs on the importance of pelvic examinations in assessing hormonal contraception eligibilityQ43904027
Meeting the contraceptive needs of teens and young adults: youth-friendly and long-acting reversible contraceptive services in U.S. family planning facilitiesQ45678310
Factors influencing the provision of long-acting reversible contraception in CaliforniaQ46595896
Shifts in intended and unintended pregnancies in the United States, 2001-2008.Q54417497
Obstetrician-gynecologists and the intrauterine device: a survey of attitudes and practiceQ77556382
P433issue5
P407language of work or nameEnglishQ1860
P304page(s)349-353
P577publication date2015-03-31
P1433published inJournal of Women's HealthQ15753624
P1476titlePreventing Unintended Pregnancy: The Contraceptive CHOICE Project in Review
P478volume24

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q38992554Comparison between the traditional non-guided and a novel ultrasound-guided technique for office fitting of intrauterine contraceptive devices.
Q50028271Comparison of the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Single-Dose Tenofovir Vaginal Film and Gel Formulation (FAME 05).
Q88971038Contraceptive Practices, Preferences, and Barriers Among Abortion Clients in North Carolina
Q58747976Contraceptive, condom and dual method use at last coitus among perinatally and horizontally HIV-infected young women in Atlanta, Georgia
Q90058235Cost Minimization Analysis of Same-Day Long-Acting Reversible Contraception for Adolescents
Q42616236Diagnosis and Management of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome in Adolescent Girls
Q95284240Effect of a mobile phone-assisted postpartum family planning service on the use of long-acting reversible contraception: a randomised controlled trial
Q47664181High birth rates despite easy access to contraception and abortion: a cross-sectional study
Q99608093Increasing the uptake of long-acting reversible contraception in general practice: the Australian Contraceptive ChOice pRoject (ACCORd) cluster randomised controlled trial longitudinal follow-up protocol
Q92186665Interventions for the prevention of pain associated with the placement of intrauterine contraceptives: An updated review
Q38569796Investigational hormone receptor agonists as ongoing female contraception: a focus on selective progesterone receptor modulators in early clinical development
Q92070408Long-acting reversible contraception: A route to reproductive justice or injustice
Q49467295New developments in intrauterine device use: focus on the US.
Q40632023Peer counselling for the promotion of long-acting, reversible contraception among teens: a randomised, controlled trial
Q90682256Perceptions matter: Narratives of contraceptive implant robbery in Cape Town, South Africa
Q38831516Pipeline for contraceptive development
Q35799214Progestins Upregulate FKBP51 Expression in Human Endometrial Stromal Cells to Induce Functional Progesterone and Glucocorticoid Withdrawal: Implications for Contraceptive- Associated Abnormal Uterine Bleeding
Q37737961Reversibility of Vasalgel™ male contraceptive in a rabbit model
Q49499945Safety of hormonal contraception for obese women
Q58617257State-Identified Implementation Strategies to Increase Uptake of Immediate Postpartum Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Policies
Q92161388Strength through Structure: Defending a Structured Approach to Contraceptive Mandates in Clinical Research
Q37030520The role of decidual cells in uterine hemostasis, menstruation, inflammation, adverse pregnancy outcomes and abnormal uterine bleeding
Q55461506Women's perceptions of contraceptive efficacy and safety.
Q92485368Young Women's Perspectives About the Contraceptive Counseling Received During Their Emergency Contraception Visit