Multiple Intravenous Infusions Phase 2b: Laboratory Study.

scientific article

Multiple Intravenous Infusions Phase 2b: Laboratory Study. is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P932PMC publication ID4549602
P698PubMed publication ID26316919

P50authorFarzan SasangoharQ85220368
Katherine H. ChanQ87140081
P2093author name stringAnthony Easty
Patricia Trbovich
Christine Koczmara
Christopher Colvin
Mark Fan
Caterina Masino
Sonia Pinkney
P2860cites workInfusion pump integrationQ95410913
The Critical Care Safety Study: the incidence and nature of adverse events and serious medical errors in intensive careQ24266838
Discretionary task interleaving: heuristics for time allocation in cognitive foragingQ28240580
A critical examination of high-fidelity human patient simulation within the context of nursing pedagogy.Q30373926
Using failure mode and effects analysis to plan implementation of smart i.v. pump technologyQ33253285
Analysis of risk factors for adverse drug events in critically ill patients*.Q33397860
Feasibility of fully automated closed-loop glucose control using continuous subcutaneous glucose measurements in critical illness: a randomized controlled trial.Q33750788
Infusion set characteristics such as antireflux valve and dead-space volume affect drug delivery: an experimental study designed to enhance infusion setsQ34151760
The impact of traditional and smart pump infusion technology on nurse medication administration performance in a simulated inpatient unitQ34289205
A review of human factors principles for the design and implementation of medication safety alerts in clinical information systems.Q34371903
Causes of intravenous medication errors: an ethnographic studyQ35526622
Insights from the sharp end of intravenous medication errors: implications for infusion pump technologyQ35527447
Medication errors in intravenous drug preparation and administration: a multicentre audit in the UK, Germany and FranceQ35527808
Multiple intravenous infusions phase 1b: practice and training scanQ36040223
Programmable infusion pumps in ICUs: an analysis of corresponding adverse drug eventsQ36293570
An overview of intravenous-related medication administration errors as reported to MEDMARX, a national medication error-reporting programQ36374861
Taking aim at infusion confusionQ36422748
A concept analysis of the phenomenon interruptionQ36735306
Nurses relate the contributing factors involved in medication errorsQ36750208
Peripheral line dead space: an unrecognised phenomenon?Q37138632
Smart infusion technology: a minimum safety standard for intensive care?Q37194444
The effects of acute stress on performance: implications for health professions educationQ37631417
Critical parameters in drug delivery by intravenous infusionQ38097084
Standard drug concentrations and smart-pump technology reduce continuous-medication-infusion errors in pediatric patientsQ38473264
Communication loads on clinical staff in the emergency departmentQ39605164
Ethnographic study of incidence and severity of intravenous drug errors.Q39742759
The link between intravenous multiple pump flow errors and infusion system mechanical complianceQ39889401
The delivery of drugs to patients by continuous intravenous infusion: modeling predicts potential dose fluctuations depending on flow rates and infusion system dead volumeQ40341066
Errors Associated with IV Infusions in Critical CareQ41262761
Preventable adverse drug events in hospitalized patients: a comparative study of intensive care and general care unitsQ41575106
Combating omission errors through task analysis and good remindersQ41838281
Crisis management during anaesthesia: vascular access problemsQ42022235
Intravenous medication administration in intensive care: opportunities for technological solutions.Q43162581
Impact of multiaccess infusion devices on in vitro drug delivery during multi-infusion therapyQ43275094
Connecting multiple low-flow intravenous infusions in the newborn: problems and possible solutionsQ44632931
The impact of multilumen infusion devices on the occurrence of known physical drug incompatibility: a controlled in vitro study.Q46455749
Variability in intravenous medication practices: implications for medication safetyQ46506754
Errors in preparation and administration of intravenous medications in the intensive care unit of a teaching hospital: an observational study.Q46665088
The checklist: if something so simple can transform intensive care, what else can it do?Q48022760
Quantitative analysis of continuous intravenous infusions in pediatric anesthesia: safety implications of dead volume, flow rates, and fluid deliveryQ48305099
An in vitro analysis of central venous drug delivery by continuous infusion: the effect of manifold design and port selectionQ48401403
An analysis of drug delivery dynamics via a pediatric central venous infusion system: quantification of delays in achieving intended dosesQ48406852
Central venous catheter infusions: a laboratory model shows large differences in drug delivery dynamics related to catheter dead volumeQ48537885
The impact of carrier flow rate and infusion set dead-volume on the dynamics of intravenous drug delivery.Q50485502
Patient transfer; what to do about the 'spaghetti'.Q51583917
Use of colour-coded labels for intravenous high-risk medications and lines to improve patient safety.Q51796655
Relationship among subjective mental workload, experience, and education of cardiovascular critical care RNs.Q52031014
Presidential address: take ownershipQ52913084
A comparison of voluntarily reported medication errors in intensive care and general care unitsQ59652647
Users as designers: how people cope with poor HCI design in computer-based medical devicesQ71928086
Continous intravenous infusion and multicompartment accumulationQ72223332
Strangulation with intravenous tubing: a previously undescribed adverse advent in childrenQ73459392
Measuring organizational traits of hospitals: the Revised Nursing Work IndexQ73959074
Medication errors involving continuously infused medications in a surgical intensive care unitQ75393875
Right programming of pumps to prevent errors in the infusion processQ78797035
Avoiding disastrous outcomes with rapid intravenous push medicationsQ80796243
Flushing an i.v. line: a simple but potentially costly procedure for both patient and health unitQ81026259
Implementation of an i.v. medication safety systemQ81474491
"Smart" infusion pumps are selectively intelligentQ83422396
Interruptions during the delivery of high-risk medicationsQ84134957
Intermittent I.V. infusions in acute care: special considerationsQ85503625
Which smart pumps are smartest?Q86209590
The effects of interruptions on oncologists' patient assessment and medication ordering practicesQ86412316
P433issue5
P304page(s)1-163
P577publication date2014-05-01
P1433published inOntario health technology assessment seriesQ27722839
P1476titleMultiple Intravenous Infusions Phase 2b: Laboratory Study
P478volume14