| scholarly article | Q13442814 |
| P356 | DOI | 10.1136/BMJOPEN-2015-008755 |
| P8608 | Fatcat ID | release_bfqtyht755hktojrtnaohlknze |
| P932 | PMC publication ID | 4563219 |
| P698 | PubMed publication ID | 26338687 |
| P5875 | ResearchGate publication ID | 281513492 |
| P50 | author | Tanya A Nippita | Q41084547 |
| Jonathan M Morris | Q90239730 | ||
| P2093 | author name string | Christine L Roberts | |
| Jane B Ford | |||
| Jillian A Patterson | |||
| Judy A Trevena | |||
| P2860 | cites work | Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term | Q24202825 |
| Does induction of labour increase the risk of caesarean section? A systematic review and meta-analysis of trials in women with intact membranes | Q27003890 | ||
| Are pregnancy outcomes associated with risk factor reporting in routinely collected perinatal data? | Q30689536 | ||
| Monitoring the quality of maternity care: how well are labour and delivery events reported in population health data? | Q33401670 | ||
| Regional variation in obstetrical intervention for hospital birth in the Republic of Ireland, 2005-2009 | Q34466847 | ||
| ACOG committee opinion no. 561: Nonmedically indicated early-term deliveries | Q34651225 | ||
| Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: comparison of ACOG practice bulletin with other national guidelines | Q38054527 | ||
| Obstetric variation, intervention, and outcomes: doing more but accomplishing less. | Q38071121 | ||
| A systematic review of medical practice variation in OECD countries. | Q38140282 | ||
| Growing literature, stagnant science? Systematic review, meta-regression and cumulative analysis of audit and feedback interventions in health care | Q38223253 | ||
| Practice bulletin no. 146: Management of late-term and postterm pregnancies | Q38232636 | ||
| Methods of classification for women undergoing induction of labour: a systematic review and novel classification system | Q38537871 | ||
| Labour should be induced at term: AGAINST: No proof of benefit | Q40901475 | ||
| Changes in tonsillectomy rates associated with feedback and review | Q41003454 | ||
| Use of the Robson classification to assess caesarean section trends in 21 countries: a secondary analysis of two WHO multicountry surveys. | Q41084473 | ||
| Variation in hospital caesarean section rates and obstetric outcomes among nulliparae at term: a population-based cohort study | Q41552756 | ||
| Doctors must lead efforts to reduce waste and variation in practice | Q43967159 | ||
| Comparison of four methods for deriving hospital standardised mortality ratios from a single hierarchical logistic regression model | Q45010667 | ||
| Rates of labor induction and primary cesarean delivery do not correlate with rates of adverse neonatal outcome in level I hospitals | Q45279280 | ||
| Comparative analysis of international cesarean delivery rates using 10-group classification identifies significant variation in spontaneous labor | Q45345509 | ||
| Forty years of unwarranted variation--and still counting. | Q45911391 | ||
| Trends and outcomes of induction of labour among nullipara at term | Q47837180 | ||
| Unexplained variation in hospital caesarean section rates | Q47976226 | ||
| Variations in practice and outcomes in the Canadian NICU network: 1996-1997. | Q50131813 | ||
| Can differences in labor induction rates be explained by case mix? | Q79963080 | ||
| Time to tackle unwarranted variations in practice | Q83638267 | ||
| Improving productivity in the NHS | Q84599703 | ||
| Labour should be induced at term: FOR: The balance of risks versus benefits favours offering term induction to all women | Q85213352 | ||
| P433 | issue | 9 | |
| P304 | page(s) | e008755 | |
| P577 | publication date | 2015-09-02 | |
| P1433 | published in | BMJ Open | Q17003470 |
| P1476 | title | Variation in hospital rates of induction of labour: a population-based record linkage study | |
| P478 | volume | 5 |
| Q93031871 | A systematic scoping review of clinical indications for induction of labour |
| Q97569873 | Exploring unwarranted clinical variation: The attitudes of midwives and obstetric medical staff regarding induction of labour and planned caesarean section |
| Q46017642 | Hospital variation in cost of childbirth and contributing factors: a cross-sectional study. |
| Q91738393 | Induction Of Labor Among Singleton Pregnancies In Six Palestinian Governmental Hospitals: A Population-Based Cohort Study |
| Q91720347 | Induction of labour indications and timing: A systematic analysis of clinical guidelines |
| Q92822571 | Induction of labour: Experiences of care and decision-making of women and clinicians |
| Q39925926 | Inter-hospital variations in labor induction and outcomes for nullipara: an Australian population-based linkage study |
| Q48099973 | Labor induction and cesarean delivery: A prospective cohort study of first births in Pennsylvania, USA. |
| Q89903521 | Membrane sweeping for induction of labour |
| Q60045627 | Standardized outcome measures for pregnancy and childbirth, an ICHOM proposal |
| Q60928367 | United States State-Level Variation in the Use of Neuraxial Analgesia During Labor for Pregnant Women |
| Q40202262 | Use of the 10-Group Classification System to analyze how the population control policy change in China has affected cesarean delivery |
| Q42362988 | Variation in clinical decision-making for induction of labour: a qualitative study |
Search more.