scholarly article | Q13442814 |
review article | Q7318358 |
P356 | DOI | 10.1007/S00330-004-2593-9 |
P698 | PubMed publication ID | 15856253 |
P2093 | author name string | Grabbe E | |
Hermann KP | |||
Obenauer S | |||
P2860 | cites work | [Malignant and benign diseases of the breast in 41 male patients: mammography, sonography and pathohistological correlations] | Q77159089 |
BI-RADS categorization as a predictor of malignancy | Q77824658 | ||
[Differential diagnosis of benign and malignant mammary lesions with special regard to the BI-RADS((R)) classification system in mammography] | Q78354670 | ||
[Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy--success, histologic accuracy, patient acceptance and optimizing the BI-RADSTM-correlated indication] | Q78786910 | ||
The American College of Radiology's BI-RADS 3 Classification in a Nationwide Screening Program: current assessment and comparison with earlier use | Q79753399 | ||
Positive predictive value of the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System | Q30579222 | ||
Validity of the breast imaging reporting and data system BI-RADS(TM) for clinical mammography in men | Q30665447 | ||
Concordance of breast imaging reporting and data system assessments and management recommendations in screening mammography | Q30671165 | ||
Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). | Q30704127 | ||
Does training in the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) improve biopsy recommendations or feature analysis agreement with experienced breast imagers at mammography? | Q30717350 | ||
Evaluation of breast microcalcifications according to Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System criteria and Le Gal's classification | Q30819455 | ||
Evaluation of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Category 3 mammograms and the use of stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in a nonacademic community practice. | Q30892950 | ||
Variability and accuracy in mammographic interpretation using the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System | Q31961935 | ||
The breast imaging reporting and data system: positive predictive value of mammographic features and final assessment categories. | Q32058696 | ||
Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: inter- and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment | Q33180500 | ||
The positive predictive value of the breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) as a method of quality assessment in breast imaging in a hospital population | Q33204581 | ||
Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers | Q33958285 | ||
Breast imaging reporting and data system standardized mammography lexicon: observer variability in lesion description | Q36796872 | ||
Use of the American College of Radiology BI-RADS to report on the mammographic evaluation of women with signs and symptoms of breast disease | Q39592362 | ||
Use of the American College of Radiology BI-RADS guidelines by community radiologists: concordance of assessments and recommendations assigned to screening mammograms | Q39606096 | ||
Breast patterns as an index of risk for developing breast cancer | Q39993031 | ||
Probably benign breast lesions: when should follow-up be recommended and what is the optimal follow-up protocol? | Q41699176 | ||
Stereotactic core-needle breast biopsy by surgeons: minimum 2-year follow-up of benign lesions | Q42634380 | ||
Periodic mammographic follow-up of probably benign lesions: results in 3,184 consecutive cases | Q46227356 | ||
Reproducibility of mammographic classifications for non-palpable suspect lesions with microcalcifications | Q46733108 | ||
Variability in radiologists' interpretations of mammograms. | Q52881735 | ||
Variability in the interpretation of screening mammograms by US radiologists. Findings from a national sample. | Q52886814 | ||
[Stereotactic vacuum core biopsy of clustered microcalcifications classified as B1-RADS 3] | Q53885562 | ||
Observer Variability and Applicability of BI-RADS Terminology for Breast MR Imaging | Q59482021 | ||
Coding mammograms using the classification "probably benign finding--short interval follow-up suggested" | Q64132349 | ||
Nonpalpable, probably benign lesions: role of follow-up mammography | Q68188433 | ||
[Using BI-RADS in French] | Q74327939 | ||
Revisiting the mammographic follow-up of BI-RADS category 3 lesions | Q74623910 | ||
Level of suspicion of a mammographic lesion: use of features defined by BI-RADS lexicon and correlation with large-core breast biopsy | Q77112556 | ||
P433 | issue | 5 | |
P407 | language of work or name | English | Q1860 |
P921 | main subject | literature review | Q2412849 |
P304 | page(s) | 1027-1036 | |
P577 | publication date | 2005-01-26 | |
P1433 | published in | European Radiology | Q5413071 |
P1476 | title | Applications and literature review of the BI-RADS classification | |
P478 | volume | 15 |