A comparison of external transducers and microtransducers in urodynamic studies of female patients

scientific article

A comparison of external transducers and microtransducers in urodynamic studies of female patients is …
instance of (P31):
review articleQ7318358
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1007/S11934-005-0048-8
P698PubMed publication ID16120232

P2093author name stringPeter M Lotze
P2860cites workPitfalls of urodynamic testingQ37697118
The urodynamic laboratoryQ38775313
Laboratory comparison of urethral profilometry techniquesQ41775491
Detrusor pressure uroflowmetry studies in women: effect of a 7Fr transurethral catheterQ43340059
Valsalva leak point pressures in women with genuine stress incontinence: Reproducibility, effect of catheter caliber, and correlations with other measures of urethral resistanceQ45082422
A comparison of urethral pressure profilometry using microtip and double-lumen perfusion catheters in women with genuine stress incontinenceQ50114487
Good urodynamic practices: uroflowmetry, filling cystometry, and pressure-flow studies.Q53315918
Standardisation of urethral pressure measurement: report from the Standardisation Sub-Committee of the International Continence Society.Q53315922
Urodynamic equipment: technical aspects. Produced by the International Continence Society Working Party on Urodynamic Equipment.Q53420969
A stable ultraminiature catheter-tip pressure transducerQ54170050
Urethral pressure profile using microtip catheter in femalesQ67019274
Urethral pressure profile. Standardization of technique and study of reproducibilityQ67288909
Simultaneous Urethrocystometry and Urethra Pressure Profile Measurement with a new TechniqueQ67428610
Disposable pressure transducersQ68119598
Pitfalls in Determination of Leak Point PressureQ68227467
The vagina as an alternative to the rectum in measuring abdominal pressure during urodynamic investigationsQ69442180
Urodynamic appraisal of vaginal versus rectal pressure recordings as indication of intra-abdominal pressure changesQ69502043
The low pressure urethra as a factor in failed retropubic urethropexyQ69762362
Validity of rectal pressure measurements as indication of intra-abdominal pressure changes during urodynamic evaluationQ70619380
Microtransducer urethral profile methodology: variations caused by transducer orientationQ71234766
New dual-channel microtip transducer catheter for urethral pressure profile and cystometryQ71842495
The urethral pressure profileQ72503877
A comparison of urethral profilometry using microtip and fiberoptic cathetersQ73310914
Effect of 6F urethral catheterization on urinary flow rates during repeated pressure-flow studies in healthy female volunteersQ74179400
Comparison of microtransducer and fiberoptic catheters for urodynamic studiesQ74378931
Value of urethral pressure profilometry in the female incontinent patient: a prospective trial with an 8-channel urethral catheterQ77628655
P433issue5
P304page(s)326-334
P577publication date2005-09-01
P1433published inCurrent urology reportsQ26853936
P1476titleA comparison of external transducers and microtransducers in urodynamic studies of female patients
P478volume6