The relationship between midwife-led group-based versus conventional antenatal care and mode of birth: a matched cohort study

scientific article

The relationship between midwife-led group-based versus conventional antenatal care and mode of birth: a matched cohort study is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P6179Dimensions Publication ID1035650819
P356DOI10.1186/S12884-016-1216-1
P932PMC publication ID5244557
P698PubMed publication ID28103820

P50authorLauren KearneyQ89028133
Rachel ReedQ40092406
Alison CraswellQ60976792
P2093author name stringMary Kynn
P2860cites workFirst-birth cesarean and placental abruption or previa at second birth(1)Q61836336
Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing womenQ24185854
Group versus conventional antenatal care for womenQ24188219
Group versus conventional antenatal care for womenQ24197481
Caesarean section versus vaginal delivery for preterm birth in singletonsQ24198092
Infant and neonatal mortality for primary cesarean and vaginal births to women with "no indicated risk," United States, 1998-2001 birth cohortsQ28261438
The effect of delaying childbirth on primary cesarean section ratesQ28757832
Caseload midwifery care versus standard maternity care for women of any risk: M@NGO, a randomised controlled trialQ30039748
Caesarean section without medical indications is associated with an increased risk of adverse short-term maternal outcomes: the 2004-2008 WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health.Q33743602
Women's experience of group prenatal careQ34897163
Practice audits to reduce caesareans in a tertiary referral hospital in south-western ChinaQ36097459
Pathways to a rising caesarean section rate: a population-based cohort studyQ36220117
Discussions of findings from a Cochrane review of midwife-led versus other models of care for childbearing women: continuity, normality and safetyQ37360700
CenteringPregnancy: an integrative literature reviewQ37856445
Does the way maternity care is provided affect maternal and neonatal outcomes for young women? A review of the research literatureQ37865168
Midwifery group practice and mode of birthQ37968418
Group prenatal care versus individual prenatal care: a systematic review and meta-analysesQ37990075
Identification and evaluation of models of antenatal care in Australia--a review of the evidence.Q38202694
Introduction of CenteringPregnancy in a public health clinicQ39867625
'Expecting and Connecting' Group Pregnancy Care: Evaluation of a collaborative clinicQ39869299
Women's views about maternity care: how do women conceptualise the process of continuity?Q40195415
Getting the first birth right: A retrospective study of outcomes for low-risk primiparous women receiving standard care versus midwifery model of care in the same tertiary hospital.Q40719344
Variation in hospital caesarean section rates and obstetric outcomes among nulliparae at term: a population-based cohort studyQ41552756
Women's experiences of group antenatal care in Australia--the CenteringPregnancy Pilot StudyQ42618418
Sample size tables for logistic regressionQ43993077
Midwives' experiences of becoming CenteringPregnancy facilitators: a pilot study in Sydney, AustraliaQ44417596
Effects of continuity of care by a primary midwife (caseload midwifery) on caesarean section rates in women of low obstetric risk: the COSMOS randomised controlled trialQ45068753
A structure and process evaluation of an Australian hospital admission avoidance programme for aged care facility residents.Q45327590
Placental position and late stillbirth: a case-control studyQ47846836
Redesigning prenatal care through CenteringPregnancy.Q53329159
P433issue1
P304page(s)39
P577publication date2017-01-19
P1433published inBMC Pregnancy and ChildbirthQ15750893
P1476titleThe relationship between midwife-led group-based versus conventional antenatal care and mode of birth: a matched cohort study
P478volume17

Search more.