Insufficient evidence for 'shaken baby syndrome' - a systematic review.

scientific article

Insufficient evidence for 'shaken baby syndrome' - a systematic review. is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1111/APA.13760
P698PubMed publication ID28130787

P50authorBoubou HallbergQ57031770
Pia C. SundgrenQ44783605
P2093author name stringAnders Eriksson
Göran Elinder
Niels Lynøe
Måns Rosén
P2860cites workThe development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviewsQ24801517
Exploring the controversy in child abuse pediatrics and false accusations of abuseQ26772882
Clinical and radiographic characteristics associated with abusive and nonabusive head trauma: a systematic reviewQ27008713
Subdural haematoma and non-accidental head injury in childrenQ48514464
Subdural hematoma in infants without accidental or nonaccidental injury: benign external hydrocephalus, a risk factorQ48870412
[Birth-related retinal hemorrhages in the newborn: incidence and relationship with maternal, obstetric and neonatal factors. Prospective study of 2,031 cases].Q51240326
Traumatic subdural effusions in children following minor head injury.Q53413144
Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviewsQ29547775
GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tablesQ29547885
Correlation between retinal abnormalities and intracranial abnormalities in the shaken baby syndromeQ30718417
Subdural hemorrhage and hypoxia in infants with congenital heart diseaseQ30844930
Intracranial hemorrhage in asymptomatic neonates: prevalence on MR images and relationship to obstetric and neonatal risk factorsQ31086935
Confessed abuse versus witnessed accidents in infants: comparison of clinical, radiological, and ophthalmological data in corroborated casesQ33516863
Analysis of missed cases of abusive head traumaQ33535672
The acute reversal sign: comparison of medical and non-accidental injury patientsQ33731784
Neuroimaging: what neuroradiological features distinguish abusive from non-abusive head trauma? A systematic reviewQ34037541
A population-based comparison of clinical and outcome characteristics of young children with serious inflicted and noninflicted traumatic brain injuryQ34345219
Intracranial hemorrhage and rebleeding in suspected victims of abusive head trauma: addressing the forensic controversiesQ34984554
Dural haemorrhage in non-traumatic infant deaths: does it explain the bleeding in 'shaken baby syndrome'?Q35064433
Case analysis of brain-injured admittedly shaken infants: 54 cases, 1969-2001.Q36240151
Retinal haemorrhages and related findings in abusive and non-abusive head trauma: a systematic reviewQ36533864
Traumatic head injury in infants and toddlersQ36853179
Retinal hemorrhages and shaken baby syndrome: an evidence-based reviewQ37350478
Which clinical features distinguish inflicted from non-inflicted brain injury? A systematic review.Q37521368
Police-induced confessions: risk factors and recommendationsQ37551691
Comparison of accidental and nonaccidental traumatic brain injuries in infants and toddlers: demographics, neurosurgical interventions, and outcomesQ37624737
A systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of ocular signs in pediatric abusive head traumaQ37719999
The "Shaken Baby" syndrome: pathology and mechanismsQ37938724
Prevalence of subdural collections in children with macrocrania.Q38122632
Acceptance of Shaken Baby Syndrome and Abusive Head Trauma as Medical DiagnosesQ39560104
Incidence, distribution, and duration of birth-related retinal hemorrhages: a prospective studyQ39754188
Prediction of inflicted brain injury in infants and children using retinal imagingQ40067595
Prevalence of retinal hemorrhages and child abuse in children who present with an apparent life-threatening eventQ42039552
Abusive head trauma: judicial admissions highlight violent and repetitive shakingQ42942251
Apnoea and brain swelling in non-accidental head injuryQ43028746
Outcome after severe non-accidental head injuryQ43103047
The cause of infant and toddler subdural hemorrhage: a prospective studyQ43726617
Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in Shaken Baby SyndromeQ43867162
Ophthalmologic findings in suspected child abuse victims with subdural hematomasQ44586443
Infant homicide and accidental death in the United States, 1940-2005: ethics and epidemiological classificationQ44807652
Prevalence and evolution of intracranial hemorrhage in asymptomatic term infantsQ45526791
Ocular findings at autopsy of child abuse victimsQ46386335
Investigating the possibility and probability of perinatal subdural hematoma progressing to chronic subdural hematoma, with and without complications, in neonates, and its potential relationship to the misdiagnosis of abusive head traumaQ46742515
Axonal injury and the neuropathology of shaken baby syndromeQ47894939
The role of cranial MRI in identifying patients suffering from child abuse and presenting with unexplained neurological findingsQ48225046
P433issue7
P407language of work or nameEnglishQ1860
P921main subjectsystematic reviewQ1504425
P304page(s)1021-1027
P577publication date2017-03-01
P1433published inActa PaediatricaQ4676739
P1476titleInsufficient evidence for 'shaken baby syndrome' - a systematic review
P478volume106

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q39258550Authors' overarching reply to all the responses received to the systematic literature review on shaken baby syndrome.
Q89489932Characteristics distinguishing abusive head trauma from accidental head trauma in infants with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage in Japan
Q50442050Conflicts of interest issues. Response to Lucas et al.
Q61854988Consensus statement on abusive head trauma in infants and young children
Q64890841From Child Protection to Paradigm Protection-The Genesis, Development, and Defense of a Scientific Paradigm.
Q57183422In order to ensure that evidence is unbiased it is sometimes necessary to retreat to the scientific ivory tower
Q57100872Infant abuse diagnosis associated with abusive head trauma criteria: incidence increase due to overdiagnosis?
Q47978592Initial response of the European Society of Paediatric Radiology and Society for Pediatric Radiology to the Swedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Assessment of Social Services' document on the triad of shaken baby syndrome
Q50435117Is accepting circular reasoning in shaken baby studies bad science or misconduct?
Q48359870National study shows that abusive head trauma mortality in Sweden was at least 10 times lower than in other Western countries.
Q48148374Pouring out the dirty bathwater without throwing away either the baby or its parents: commentary to Saunders et al.
Q48314675Questions about isolated traumatic shaking and confessions.
Q53099662Raised intracranial pressure and retinal haemorrhages in childhood encephalopathies: reply to the commentary by Squier.
Q48325135Retinal haemorrhage: a red flag for raised intracranial pressure.
Q47711498Shaken baby syndrome and the risk of losing scientific scrutiny.
Q88801016Shaken baby syndrome is real
Q49561820Subdural haemorrhage in infants: abuse or natural causes? The importance of thorough child death review
Q93028706The Promise of Molecular Autopsy in Forensic Pathology Practice
Q90703613The Swedish Agency for health technology-report about traumatic shaking: much ado about nothing?
Q50436847The scientific evidence regarding retinal haemorrhages. Response to Hellgren et al. and Levin.
Q50442045The shaken baby syndrome report was not the result of a conspiracy. Response to Dr. Narang et al
Q41953413Throwing the baby out with the bath water - response to the Swedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Assessment of Social Services (SBU) report on traumatic shaking
Q39218325Using the table in the Swedish review on shaken baby syndrome will not help courts deliver justice.
Q50442041What are acceptable conclusions? Response to Dr. Ludvigsson.