The Common Drug Review: a NICE start for Canada?

scientific article

The Common Drug Review: a NICE start for Canada? is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1016/J.HEALTHPOL.2005.08.006
P698PubMed publication ID16214257

P2093author name stringMeghan McMahon
Steve Morgan
Craig Mitton
P433issue3
P921main subjectCanadaQ16
P304page(s)339-351
P577publication date2005-10-06
P1433published inHealth PolicyQ15758180
P1476titleThe Common Drug Review: a NICE start for Canada?
P478volume77

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q38043434'Innovation' in health care coverage decisions: all talk and no substance?
Q34469352A comparison of drug coverage in alberta before and after the introduction of the national common drug review process.
Q34598634Adherence to prescribing recommendations made on a provincial formulary
Q35576993Analysis of drug coverage before and after the implementation of Canada's Common Drug Review.
Q37113030Assurance-médicaments nationale: Le moment d'aller de l'avant
Q37238289Breadth, Depth and Agreement among Provincial Formularies in Canada.
Q46230521COST-EFFECTIVENESS IMPACTS CANCER CARE FUNDING DECISIONS IN BRITISH COLUMBIA, CANADA, EVIDENCE FROM 1998 TO 2008.
Q41585720Challenges in measuring the societal value of orphan drugs: insights from a canadian stated preference survey.
Q28308288Chromosome 8p as a potential hub for developmental neuropsychiatric disorders: implications for schizophrenia, autism and cancer
Q37979271Common Drug Review recommendations: an evidence base for expectations?
Q46825568Community or patient preferences for cost-effectiveness of cardiac rehabilitation: does it matter?
Q33701810Cost shifting and timeliness of drug formulary decisions in atlantic Canada.
Q34362510Decision-making in healthcare: a practical application of partial least square path modelling to coverage of newborn screening programmes
Q48289414Economic evaluation of floseal compared to nasal packing for the management of anterior epistaxis.
Q37521051Evaluating alignment between Canadian Common Drug Review reimbursement recommendations and provincial drug plan listing decisions: an exploratory study.
Q34462245Impact of drug policy on regional trends in ezetimibe use
Q51952330Implementing accountability for reasonableness--the case of pharmaceutical reimbursement in Sweden.
Q37103172Influencing Drug Prices through Formulary-Based Policies: Lessons from New Zealand
Q34567661Inter-jurisdictional cooperation on pharmaceutical product listing agreements: views from Canadian provinces
Q36876028Lessons for a national pharmaceuticals strategy in Canada from Australia and New Zealand
Q51200231Link between process and appraisal in coverage decisions: an analysis with structural equation modeling.
Q37123317Media Hyping and the "Herceptin Access Story": An Analysis of Canadian and UK Newspaper Coverage
Q37112999National pharmacare: Time to move forward
Q33933850Oncology drug health technology assessment recommendations: Canadian versus UK experiences
Q59133098Prescription drug coverage in Canada: a review of the economic, policy and political considerations for universal pharmacare
Q39781561Public and decision maker stated preferences for pharmaceutical subsidy decisions: a pilot study
Q84628674Re: "cost shifting and timeliness of drug formulary recommendations in atlantic canada," healthcare policy, vol. 5, no. 3, 2010
Q57794313Role of economic evidence in coverage decision-making in South Korea
Q36887224The economics of end-stage renal disease care in Canada: incentives and impact on delivery of care
Q28069734Universal prescription drug coverage in Canada: Long-promised yet undelivered
Q38902166Using health technology assessment to assess the value of new medicines: results of a systematic review and expert consultation across eight European countries

Search more.