Analysis of Cesarean Section Rate - According to Robson's 10-group Classification

scientific article

Analysis of Cesarean Section Rate - According to Robson's 10-group Classification is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.5001/OMJ.2012.102
P932PMC publication ID3472574
P698PubMed publication ID23074555
P5875ResearchGate publication ID232278739

P2093author name stringSarva Saiseema
Sultana Khan
Tahira Kazmi
P2860cites workCesarean section rate in Iran, multidimensional approaches for behavioral change of providers: a qualitative studyQ30502982
Epidemiology and trends for Caesarean section births in New South Wales, Australia: a population-based studyQ33798654
Fetal electrocardiogram: ST waveform analysis in intrapartum surveillanceQ36454897
Determinants of the increasing cesarean birth rate. Ontario data 1979 to 1982.Q36607115
Cesarean birth in the United States: epidemiology, trends, and outcomes.Q37154236
Comparing rates of trial of labour attempts, VBAC success, and fetal and maternal complications among family physicians and obstetriciansQ39832956
Comparative analysis of international cesarean delivery rates using 10-group classification identifies significant variation in spontaneous laborQ45345509
Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007-08.Q46332113
Caesarean birth rates worldwide. A search for determinants.Q46363236
Indications for cesarean deliveries in Norway.Q51299309
Evaluation of interobserver agreement of cardiotocograms.Q52268291
Caesarean section: the paradoxQ58467876
Can we reduce the caesarean section rate?Q73895035
P433issue5
P921main subjectcesarean sectionQ228036
P304page(s)415-417
P577publication date2012-09-01
P1433published inOman Medical JournalQ3618856
P1476titleAnalysis of Cesarean Section Rate - According to Robson's 10-group Classification
P478volume27

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q33706449A systematic review of the Robson classification for caesarean section: what works, doesn't work and how to improve it.
Q54937941Analysis of caesarean sections using Robson 10-group classification system in a university hospital in eastern Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study.
Q28365206Are freestanding midwifery units a safe alternative to obstetric units for low-risk, primiparous childbirth? An analysis of effect differences by parity in a matched cohort study
Q58565477Caesarean section in Palestine using the Robson Ten Group Classification System: a population-based birth cohort study
Q37229554Cesarean Section Rate Analysis in University Hospital Tuzla - According to Robson's Classification
Q41428782Factors Associated With Increased Rates of Caesarean Section in Women of Advanced Maternal Age.
Q93047450Household- and community-level determinants of low-risk Caesarean deliveries among women in India
Q39038006Is the Robson's classification system burdened by obstetric pathologies, maternal characteristics and assistential levels in comparing hospitals cesarean rates? A regional analysis of class 1 and 3.
Q38762714Proposing a Hybrid Model Based on Robson's Classification for Better Impact on Trends of Cesarean Deliveries
Q37274840Psychological Predictors of Intention to Deliver Vaginally through the Extended Parallel Process Model: A Mixed-Method Approach in Pregnant Iranian Women
Q33741832Segregation of Patients for Intrapartum Monitoring, using Robson's Classification