A heuristics approach to understanding cancer risk perception: contributions from judgment and decision-making research

scientific article

A heuristics approach to understanding cancer risk perception: contributions from judgment and decision-making research is …
instance of (P31):
review articleQ7318358
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1207/S15324796ABM3101_8
P698PubMed publication ID16472038
P5875ResearchGate publication ID7304605

P2093author name stringEllen Peters
Wendy Nelson
Michael Stefanek
Kevin D McCaul
P2860cites workA perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationalityQ28213169
Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationalityQ28255959
Risk as feelingsQ33943609
Money, kisses, and electric shocks: on the affective psychology of riskQ48367887
Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgmentQ55871231
P433issue1
P921main subjectdecision makingQ1331926
P304page(s)45-52
P577publication date2006-02-01
P1433published inAnnals of Behavioral MedicineQ4767844
P1476titleA heuristics approach to understanding cancer risk perception: contributions from judgment and decision-making research
P478volume31

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q57947405A counselee-oriented perspective on risk communication in genetic counseling: Explaining the inaccuracy of the counseleesʼ risk perception shortly after BRCA1/2 test result disclosure
Q90320471Attitudes towards a programme of risk assessment and stratified management for ovarian cancer: a focus group study of UK South Asians' perspectives
Q37141548Breast cancer anxiety's associations with responses to a chemoprevention decision aid
Q35910475Cognitive and affective influences on perceived risk of ovarian cancer
Q36433719Cognitive and emotional factors predicting decisional conflict among high-risk breast cancer survivors who receive uninformative BRCA1/2 results
Q34262449DNA-testing for BRCA1/2 prior to genetic counselling in patients with breast cancer: design of an intervention study, DNA-direct
Q35142194Decision making and cancer.
Q36494121Deliberative and intuitive risk perceptions as predictors of colorectal cancer screening over time
Q47549695Don't know responses to cognitive and affective risk perception measures: Exploring prevalence and socio-demographic moderators
Q33755651Examining Intuitive Cancer Risk Perceptions in Haitian-Creole and Spanish-Speaking Populations
Q33835395Examining intuitive risk perceptions for cancer in diverse populations
Q37312028Experience of BRCA1/2 mutation-negative young women from families with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: a qualitative study
Q58818801Feeling good, feeling bad, and feeling at‐risk: a review of incidental affect's influence on likelihood estimates of health hazards and life events
Q37078091Individual Differences in Base Rate Neglect: A Fuzzy Processing Preference Index
Q39062849Influencing feelings of cancer risk: direct and moderator effects of affectively laden phrases in risk communication
Q35815469Long-term psychosocial outcomes of BRCA1/BRCA2 testing: differences across affected status and risk-reducing surgery choice
Q33814061Management of chronic hypertension in older men: an exploration of patient goal-setting
Q38623659Measurement invariance of intuitive cancer risk perceptions across diverse populations: The Cognitive Causation and Negative Affect in Risk scales
Q50559453Measuring the degree of closeness to the cancer experience: development and initial validation of the CONNection to the Experience of Cancer Scale (CONNECS).
Q37836656Parental adjustment to the completion of their child's cancer treatment
Q35585790Patient willingness to take teriparatide
Q47122668Perception of Risk and Terrorism-Related Behavior Change: Dual Influences of Probabilistic Reasoning and Reality Testing
Q35164851Population-based genetic risk prediction and stratification for ovarian cancer: views from women at high risk
Q57442706Public Estimates of Cancer Frequency: Cancer Incidence Perceptions Mirror Distorted Media Depictions
Q44636501Public perception of cancer survival rankings
Q38537454Radioiodine-remnant ablation in low-risk differentiated thyroid cancer: pros
Q36274541Reduced fatalism and increased prevention behavior after two high-profile lung cancer events
Q93345684Reflections on a Health Psychology Service for Patients with Uveal Melanoma: The Challenge of Psychological Screening and Intervention When Distress is 'Normal'
Q48287269Risk perception among women at risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer
Q35247817Risk perception and preference for prevention of Alzheimer's disease
Q47720255Smarter than we think: when our brains detect that we are biased
Q57282983The impact of gene expression profile testing on confidence in chemotherapy decisions and prognostic expectations
Q39544575The influence of narrative risk communication on feelings of cancer risk
Q64106539The role of emotions in cancer patients’ decision-making
Q37998631The salience of existential concerns across the cancer control continuum
Q39727677Thinking versus feeling: differentiating between cognitive and affective components of perceived cancer risk
Q40557577Towards an understanding of adult judgments of synergistic health benefits
Q58874158Two sides of the coin: measuring and communicating the trustworthiness of online information
Q37514263Understanding Genetic Breast Cancer Risk: Processing Loci of the BRCA Gist Intelligent Tutoring System
Q34660477Values and options in cancer care (VOICE): study design and rationale for a patient-centered communication and decision-making intervention for physicians, patients with advanced cancer, and their caregivers

Search more.