Radiological surveillance of interval breast cancers in screening programmes

scientific article

Radiological surveillance of interval breast cancers in screening programmes is …
instance of (P31):
review articleQ7318358
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70617-9
P698PubMed publication ID16510335

P50authorNehmat HoussamiQ57070652
Stefano CiattoQ114421054
P2093author name stringLes Irwig
P2860cites workTwo models for radiological reviewing of interval cancersQ33631925
A blind review and an informed review of interval breast cancer cases in the Limburg screening programme, the NetherlandsQ33916262
Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancersQ33958285
Interval cancer peer review in East Anglia: implications for monitoring doctors as well as the NHS breast screening programmeQ34132455
Radiological review of interval cancers in an Australian mammographic screening programme. Radiology Quality Assurance Group of BreastScreen VictoriaQ34153977
Computed assisted detection of interval breast cancersQ34346553
Reviewing interval cancers: time well spent?Q34641381
Radiology review of the UKCCCR Breast Screening Frequency Trial: potential improvements in sensitivity and lead time of radiological signsQ35080198
New technologies in screening for breast cancer: a systematic review of their accuracyQ35776937
The detectability of breast cancer by screening mammographyQ36080403
Evaluation of computer-aided detection (CAD) devicesQ36139917
Interval carcinomas in the Malmö Mammographic Screening Trial: radiographic appearance and prognostic considerationsQ36329088
NHS breast screening programme: is the high incidence of interval cancers inevitable?Q36601552
Breast density as a determinant of interval cancer at mammographic screening.Q36694382
UKCCCR multicentre randomised controlled trial of one and two view mammography in breast cancer screeningQ36905384
Interval breast cancers are not biologically distinct--just more difficult to diagnoseQ38482161
Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screeningQ39730356
Classifying interval cancersQ40376571
Previous mammograms in patients with impalpable breast carcinoma: retrospective vs blinded interpretation. 1993 ARRS President's AwardQ40784673
Proficiency test for screening mammography: results for 117 volunteer Italian radiologistsQ40788866
Monitoring interval cancers in breast screening programmes: the east Anglian experience. Quality Assurance Management Group of the East Anglian Breast Screening ProgrammeQ41001088
Interval cancer and survival in a randomized breast cancer screening trial in StockholmQ41103862
Survival in breast cancer diagnosed between mammographic screening examinationsQ41342057
Analysis of interval breast carcinomas in a randomized screening trial in StockholmQ41464280
Influence of number of views and mammographic film density on the detection of invasive cancers: results from the NHS Breast Screening ProgrammeQ41534895
Medical audit after 26,711 breast imaging studies: improved rate of detection of small breast carcinomas (classified as Tis or T1a,b)Q42689079
What should be done about interval breast cancers?Q42811182
The NHS breast cancer screening programmeQ43236471
Interval breast cancers in New South Wales, Australia, and comparisons with trials and other mammographic screening programmes.Q44362165
A comparison of cancer detection rates achieved by breast cancer screening programmes by number of readers, for one and two view mammography: results from the UK National Health Service breast screening programme.Q50638071
Standardized abnormal interpretation and cancer detection ratios to assess reading volume and reader performance in a breast screening program.Q50659712
Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS).Q50761882
An evaluation of the impact of computer-based prompts on screen readers' interpretation of mammograms.Q52092983
Independent double reading of screening mammograms.Q52876546
Invasive interval cancers in the Ostergötland Mammographic Screening Programme: radiological analysis.Q54467645
Survival in interval breast cancer in the DOM screening programmeQ70836344
Benefit of independent double reading in a population-based mammography screening programQ72307381
The efficacy of double reading mammograms in breast screeningQ72374202
Interval cancers as an indicator of performance in breast screeningQ73072966
Incident screening cancers detected with a second mammographic view: pathological and radiological featuresQ73225433
Use of two view mammography compared with one view in the detection of small invasive cancers: further results from the National Health Service breast screening programmeQ73635900
Efficiency of cancer detection during routine repeat (incident) mammographic screening: two versus one view mammographyQ77488664
The Scottish breast screening programme's experience of monitoring interval cancersQ77732969
Comparison of standard reading and computer aided detection (CAD) on a national proficiency test of screening mammographyQ78819186
Breast cancer screening with MRI--what are the data for patients at high risk?Q80392079
Factors contributing to mammography failure in women aged 40-49 yearsQ80826088
An audit of assessment procedures in women who develop breast cancer after a negative resultQ81210175
P433issue3
P304page(s)259-265
P577publication date2006-03-01
P1433published inLancet Oncology CommissionQ13747613
P1476titleRadiological surveillance of interval breast cancers in screening programmes
P478volume7

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q37529455Analysis of interval cancers observed in an Italian mammography screening programme (2000-2006).
Q58593347Association of symptoms and interval breast cancers in the mammography-screening programme: population-based matched cohort study
Q90012718Breast Cancer Screening Program in Lithuania: Interval Cancers and Program Sensitivity After 7 Years of Mammography Screening
Q57339170Breast cancer genetic risk profile is differentially associated with interval and screen-detected breast cancers
Q44089144Clinicopathological differences between interval and screen-detected breast cancers diagnosed within a screening programme in Northern Portugal
Q51830145Computer-assisted diagnosis (CAD) in mammography: comparison of diagnostic accuracy of a new algorithm (Cyclopus, Medicad) with two commercial systems.
Q48537710Digital breast tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) for screening women with dense breasts
Q38391779Effect of short message service as a reminder on breast self-examination in breast cancer patients: a randomized controlled trial
Q36903343Mammographic density and risk of breast cancer according to tumor characteristics and mode of detection: a Spanish population-based case-control study
Q37018080Mammographic density and risk of breast cancer by mode of detection and tumor size: a case-control study
Q47116028Mammographic density and risk of breast cancer by tumor characteristics: a case-control study
Q34125697Methodological issues for determining intervals of subsequent cancer screening
Q37720423Overdiagnosis of breast cancer in population screening: does it make breast screening worthless?
Q37971452Proportional incidence and radiological review of large (T2+) breast cancers as surrogate indicators of screening programme performance.
Q88015700Silicone-based composite materials simulate breast tissue to be used as ultrasonography training phantoms
Q33767364The epidemiology, radiology and biological characteristics of interval breast cancers in population mammography screening
Q37691252Tumor phenotype and breast density in distinct categories of interval cancer: results of population-based mammography screening in Spain
Q38436553Value of audits in breast cancer screening quality assurance programmes
Q48207118Wavelet-based scaling indices for breast cancer diagnostics.

Search more.