| review article | Q7318358 |
| scholarly article | Q13442814 |
| P2093 | author name string | Paul W Glimcher | |
| Brent Garland | |||
| P433 | issue | 2 | |
| P921 | main subject | cognitive neuroscience | Q1138951 |
| P304 | page(s) | 130-134 | |
| P577 | publication date | 2006-03-24 | |
| P1433 | published in | Current Opinion in Neurobiology | Q15763572 |
| P1476 | title | Cognitive neuroscience and the law. | |
| P478 | volume | 16 |
| Q28310264 | Detecting individual memories through the neural decoding of memory states and past experience |
| Q64079228 | Does It Matter Whether You or Your Brain Did It? An Empirical Investigation of the Influence of the Double Subject Fallacy on Moral Responsibility Judgments |
| Q38410619 | Don't Ask a Neuroscientist about Phases of the Moon |
| Q31159958 | Implications of fMRI and genetics for the law and the routine practice of forensic psychiatry |
| Q47098098 | Integrating Brain Science and Law: Neuroscientific Evidence and Legal Perspectives on Protecting Individual Liberties |
| Q37110688 | Intentional retrieval suppression can conceal guilty knowledge in ERP memory detection tests. |
| Q57988862 | Neuroimaging Techniques for Memory Detection: Scientific, Ethical, and Legal Issues |
| Q58880412 | Perceived Access to Self-relevant Information Mediates Judgments of Privacy Violations in Neuromonitoring and Other Monitoring Technologies |
| Q37044238 | Which future for neuroscience in forensic psychiatry: theoretical hurdles and empirical chances. |
Search more.