| scholarly article | Q13442814 |
| P2093 | author name string | Elizabeth Lazarus | |
| Martha B Mainiero | |||
| Barbara Schepps | |||
| Susan L Koelliker | |||
| Linda S Livingston | |||
| P433 | issue | 2 | |
| P407 | language of work or name | English | Q1860 |
| P921 | main subject | mammography | Q324634 |
| P1104 | number of pages | 7 | |
| P304 | page(s) | 385-391 | |
| P577 | publication date | 2006-03-28 | |
| P1433 | published in | Radiology | Q3285690 |
| P1476 | title | BI-RADS lexicon for US and mammography: interobserver variability and positive predictive value | |
| P478 | volume | 239 |
| Q84952202 | "High-grade" central acellular carcinoma and matrix-producing carcinoma of the breast: correlation between ultrasonographic findings and pathological features |
| Q89476448 | A combined ultrasonic B-mode and color Doppler system for the classification of breast masses using neural network |
| Q30448706 | A comparison of logistic regression analysis and an artificial neural network using the BI-RADS lexicon for ultrasonography in conjunction with introbserver variability |
| Q62491611 | A computer-aided diagnosis system using artificial intelligence for the diagnosis and characterization of breast masses on ultrasound: Added value for the inexperienced breast radiologist |
| Q37799007 | A prospective study to compare the diagnostic performance of breast elastography versus conventional breast ultrasound |
| Q47190784 | ACR BI-RADS Assessment Category 4 Subdivisions in Diagnostic Mammography: Utilization and Outcomes in the National Mammography Database |
| Q30408134 | Acoustic radiation force impulse elastography for differentiation of malignant and benign breast lesions: a meta-analysis |
| Q31094573 | Adjunctive targeted contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for the work-up of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category 3 and 4 lesions |
| Q89821313 | Agreement between dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and pathologic tumour size of breast cancer and analysis of the correlation with BI-RADS descriptors |
| Q84166094 | All atypia diagnosed at stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy do not need surgical excision |
| Q83217494 | Appearance of breast masses on sonoelastography with special focus on the diagnosis of fibroadenomas |
| Q38649793 | Application of Computer-Aided Diagnosis on Breast Ultrasonography: Evaluation of Diagnostic Performances and Agreement of Radiologists According to Different Levels of Experience |
| Q39709524 | Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy and Efficiency of Categories 4 and 5 of the Second Edition of the BI-RADS Ultrasound Lexicon in Diagnosing Breast Lesions |
| Q37639548 | Association of mammographic density with pathologic findings |
| Q38433430 | Automated breast ultrasound system (ABUS): reproducibility of mass localization, size measurement, and characterization on serial examinations |
| Q36904185 | Automated feature set selection and its application to MCC identification in digital mammograms for breast cancer detection |
| Q46512918 | BI-RADS categorisation of 2,708 consecutive nonpalpable breast lesions in patients referred to a dedicated breast care unit. |
| Q30449283 | Band-like interposing fat along large vessels: ultrasonographic pseudolesions of the breast |
| Q51100247 | Bayesian probability of malignancy with BI-RADS sonographic features. |
| Q47100899 | Benign Lesions on Screening Mammography: Increasing Diagnostic Confidence in a Hitherto Unscreened Population |
| Q39015288 | Breast Cancers Found with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: A Comparison of Pathology and Histologic Grade |
| Q30468734 | Breast Sonography - 2D, 3D, 4D Ultrasound or Elastography? |
| Q36481548 | Breast cancer risk prediction and mammography biopsy decisions: a model-based study |
| Q44022650 | Breast elastography diagnosis based on dynamic sequence features. |
| Q38235161 | Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma: sensitivity, specificity, and findings of imaging studies in 44 patients |
| Q38474926 | Breast ultrasonography in young Asian women: analyses of BI-RADS final assessment category according to symptoms |
| Q41625111 | Can Cut-Off-Values for Tumor Size or Patient Age in Breast Ultrasound Reduce Unnecessary Biopsies or is it all About Bi-rads?- A Retrospective Analysis of 763 Biopsied T1-Sized Lesions |
| Q38960406 | Can Radiologists Predict the Presence of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ and Invasive Breast Cancer? |
| Q34105016 | Category assessment based on 3D volume data acquired by automated breast ultrasonography |
| Q33823926 | Challenges to developing proteomic-based breast cancer diagnostics. |
| Q30417288 | Characterization of breast lesions: comparison of digital breast tomosynthesis and ultrasonography |
| Q34238178 | Characterization of thyroid nodules using the proposed thyroid imaging reporting and data system (TI-RADS). |
| Q48031683 | Classification of normal screening mammograms is strongly influenced by perceived mammographic breast density |
| Q37551704 | Clinical application of S-Detect to breast masses on ultrasonography: a study evaluating the diagnostic performance and agreement with a dedicated breast radiologist |
| Q40525006 | Combined Use of Ultrasound Elastography and B-Mode Sonography for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Circumscribed Breast Masses |
| Q34987077 | Comparing the performance of image enhancement methods to detect microcalcification clusters in digital mammography |
| Q35063361 | Comparison between fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and core needle biopsy (CNB) in the diagnosis of breast lesions |
| Q39669282 | Comparison of Inter-Observer Variability and Diagnostic Performance of the Fifth Edition of BI-RADS for Breast Ultrasound of Static versus Video Images. |
| Q55056403 | Comparison of clinicopathological findings among patients whose mammography results were classified as category 4 subgroups of the BI-RADS. |
| Q41646497 | Comparison of lesion detection in the transverse and coronal views on automated breast sonography |
| Q45562113 | Comparison of strain and shear wave elastography for the differentiation of benign from malignant breast lesions, combined with B-mode ultrasonography: qualitative and quantitative assessments |
| Q30471855 | Computer-aided classification of breast masses: performance and interobserver variability of expert radiologists versus residents |
| Q34642064 | Concordant or discordant? Imaging-pathology correlation in a sonography-guided core needle biopsy of a breast lesion |
| Q57815802 | Confirmed value of shear wave elastography for ultrasound characterization of breast masses using a conservative approach in Chinese women: a large-size prospective multicenter trial |
| Q35572206 | Development of an online, publicly accessible naive Bayesian decision support tool for mammographic mass lesions based on the American College of Radiology (ACR) BI-RADS lexicon |
| Q36092327 | Diagnostic Performance of Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Non-Calcified Equivocal Breast Findings: Results from a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
| Q53056454 | Diagnostic concordance in reporting breast needle core biopsies using the B classification-A panel in Italy. |
| Q64084074 | Diagnostic performance of qualitative and quantitative shear wave elastography in differentiating malignant from benign breast masses, and association with the histological prognostic factors |
| Q86168788 | Diagnostic performances of shear wave elastography: which parameter to use in differential diagnosis of solid breast masses? |
| Q51221094 | Diagnostic value of commercially available shear-wave elastography for breast cancers: integration into BI-RADS classification with subcategories of category 4. |
| Q45341862 | Does power Doppler ultrasonography improve the BI-RADS category assessment and diagnostic accuracy of solid breast lesions? |
| Q64071511 | Effect of a Deep Learning Framework-Based Computer-Aided Diagnosis System on the Diagnostic Performance of Radiologists in Differentiating between Malignant and Benign Masses on Breast Ultrasonography |
| Q33485199 | Effect of contact force on breast tissue optical property measurements using a broadband diffuse optical spectroscopy handheld probe |
| Q49712317 | Evaluating imaging-pathology concordance and discordance after ultrasound-guided breast biopsy |
| Q38429388 | Evaluation of malignancy risk stratification of microcalcifications detected on mammography: a study based on the 5th edition of BI-RADS. |
| Q39346378 | Experiences with a self-test for Dutch breast screening radiologists: lessons learnt |
| Q36061406 | External validation of a publicly available computer assisted diagnostic tool for mammographic mass lesions with two high prevalence research datasets |
| Q88142295 | Focal breast lesion characterization according to the BI-RADS US lexicon: role of a computer-aided decision-making support |
| Q40106173 | High-grade histologic features of DCIS are associated with R5 rather than R3 calcifications in breast screening mammography. |
| Q30573766 | Histological analysis of benign breast imaging reporting and data system categories 4c and 5 breast lesions in imaging study |
| Q30484485 | How to improve your breast cancer program: Standardized reporting using the new American College of Radiology Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System |
| Q91796697 | In-cell determination of Lactate Dehydrogenase Activity in a Luminal Breast Cancer Model ⁻ ex vivo Investigation of Excised Xenograft Tumor Slices Using dDNP Hyperpolarized [1-13C]pyruvate |
| Q39470556 | Incorporating Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound into the BI-RADS Scoring System Improves Accuracy in Breast Tumor Diagnosis: A Preliminary Study in China |
| Q35623350 | Independent predictors of breast malignancy in screen-detected microcalcifications: biopsy results in 2545 cases. |
| Q33724300 | Individualized computer-aided education in mammography based on user modeling: concept and preliminary experiments |
| Q41349608 | Influence of various breast factors on the quality of strain elastograms |
| Q38427294 | Intensity-Invariant Texture Analysis for Classification of BI-RADS Category 3 Breast Masses. |
| Q33956853 | Inter- and intraobserver reliability and validation of a new method for determination of eosinophil counts in patients with esophageal eosinophilia |
| Q36407013 | Inter- and intraradiologist variability in the BI-RADS assessment and breast density categories for screening mammograms |
| Q46219002 | Inter-observer variability in mammographic density assessment using Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists (RANZCR) synoptic scales |
| Q38795460 | Interobserver Reproducibility of the PI-RADS Version 2 Lexicon: A Multicenter Study of Six Experienced Prostate Radiologists. |
| Q64938542 | Interobserver agreement in breast ultrasound categorization in the Mammography and Ultrasonography Study for Breast Cancer Screening Effectiveness (MUST-BE) trial: results of a preliminary study. |
| Q30428284 | Interobserver agreement on the interpretation of automated whole breast ultrasonography |
| Q30445902 | Interobserver and Intraobserver Agreement of Sonographic BIRADS Lexicon in the Assessment of Breast Masses |
| Q30470591 | Interobserver concordance in the BI-RADS classification of breast ultrasound exams |
| Q44009963 | Interobserver variability of ultrasound elastography and the ultrasound BI-RADS lexicon of breast lesions |
| Q64959168 | Interpretive Performance and Inter-Observer Agreement on Digital Mammography Test Sets. |
| Q43727026 | Is it time for prostate MRI certification? |
| Q37979994 | Lexicon for standardized interpretation of gamma camera molecular breast imaging: observer agreement and diagnostic accuracy |
| Q37720899 | Malignant lesions initially categorized as probably benign breast lesions: retrospective review of ultrasonographic, clinical and pathologic characteristics |
| Q38199776 | Mammography performance in Oman: Review of factors influencing cancer yield and positive predictive value. |
| Q30854440 | Meta-analysis of thyroid imaging reporting and data system in the ultrasonographic diagnosis of 10,437 thyroid nodules |
| Q37250492 | Microcalcifications Detected as an Abnormality on Screening Mammography: Outcomes and Followup over a Five-Year Period |
| Q46494477 | Morphological parameters of flat epithelial atypia (FEA) in stereotactic vacuum-assisted needle core biopsies do not predict the presence of malignancy on subsequent surgical excision |
| Q30408211 | Nonpalpable BI-RADS 4 breast lesions: sonographic findings and pathology correlation |
| Q34278769 | Observer Variability of the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) Lexicon for Mammography |
| Q30491241 | Observer agreement using the ACR Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS)-ultrasound, First Edition (2003) |
| Q39836574 | Observer variability in screen-film mammography versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading |
| Q38242656 | Outcomes of solid palpable masses assessed as BI-RADS 3 or 4A: a retrospective review |
| Q57734054 | Performance of hand-held whole-breast ultrasound based on BI-RADS in women with mammographically negative dense breast |
| Q50100716 | Pilot study of a new comprehensive radiology report categorization (RADCAT) system in the emergency department |
| Q64967425 | Precision biopsy of breast microcalcifications: An improvement in surgical excision. |
| Q39239328 | Predicting error in detecting mammographic masses among radiology trainees using statistical models based on BI-RADS features |
| Q33543213 | Predictors of interobserver agreement in breast imaging using the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System |
| Q41451618 | Prognostic importance of ultrasound BI-RADS classification in breast cancer patients |
| Q30461429 | Quantification of the UK 5-point breast imaging classification and mapping to BI-RADS to facilitate comparison with international literature. |
| Q30424166 | Quantitative ultrasound analysis for classification of BI-RADS category 3 breast masses |
| Q36842303 | Radiologist agreement for mammographic recall by case difficulty and finding type |
| Q35131036 | Radiologist characteristics associated with interpretive performance of diagnostic mammography |
| Q36662519 | Radiologists' performance for detecting lesions and the interobserver variability of automated whole breast ultrasound |
| Q80933041 | Real-time ultrasound elastography: its potential role in assessment of breast lesions |
| Q37867393 | Reducing inter-rater variability in the assessment of nuchal translucency image quality |
| Q30319809 | Reliability and validity of needle biopsy evaluation of breast-abnormalities using the B-categorization--design and objectives of the Diagnosis Optimisation Study (DIOS). |
| Q38836967 | Reproducibility of quantitative high-throughput BI-RADS features extracted from ultrasound images of breast cancer |
| Q52714086 | Retroareolar masses and intraductal abnormalities detected on screening ultrasound: can biopsy be avoided? |
| Q38063836 | Risk of malignancy in palpable solid breast masses considered probably benign or low suspicion: implications for management |
| Q38467401 | Scoring system based on BI-RADS lexicon to predict probability of malignancy in suspicious microcalcifications |
| Q38008282 | Scoring systems used for the interpretation and reporting of multiparametric MRI for prostate cancer detection, localization, and characterization: could standardization lead to improved utilization of imaging within the diagnostic pathway? |
| Q35971117 | Screening Ultrasound in Women with Negative Mammography: Outcome Analysis |
| Q90038736 | Second opinion interpretation of breast ultrasound images-Is it worth another look? |
| Q30492873 | Sensitivity of imaging for multifocal-multicentric breast carcinoma |
| Q30468391 | Shear wave elastography for breast masses is highly reproducible |
| Q38686720 | Simplifying Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System classification of mammograms with pure suspicious calcifications |
| Q36831884 | Sonographic features of breast carcinoma presenting as masses in BRCA gene mutation carriers |
| Q45347827 | Strain-compounding technique with ultrasound Nakagami imaging for distinguishing between benign and malignant breast tumors. |
| Q91865921 | Subcategorization of Ultrasonographic BI-RADS Category 4: Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy in Diagnosing Breast Lesions and Influence of Clinical Factors on Positive Predictive Value |
| Q38475526 | Subcategorization of ultrasonographic BI-RADS category 4: positive predictive value and clinical factors affecting it. |
| Q88575697 | Suspicious breast calcifications undergoing stereotactic biopsy in women ages 70 and over: Breast cancer incidence by BI-RADS descriptors |
| Q34996582 | The ACR BI-RADS experience: learning from history |
| Q34194755 | The Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) in the Dutch breast cancer screening programme: its role as an assessment and stratification tool |
| Q39341321 | The association between mammographic calcifications and breast cancer prognostic factors in a population-based registry cohort |
| Q37433598 | The challenges, opportunities, and imperative of structured reporting in medical imaging |
| Q34534802 | The mammographic density of a mass is a significant predictor of breast cancer |
| Q36324741 | The practical application of the UK 5-point scoring system for breast imaging: how standardisation of reporting supports the multidisciplinary team |
| Q35030287 | The use of the Gail model, body mass index and SNPs to predict breast cancer among women with abnormal (BI-RADS 4) mammograms |
| Q57733967 | Three-dimensional shear-wave elastography for differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions: comparison with two-dimensional shear-wave elastography |
| Q30798487 | Thyroid imaging reporting and data system (TI-RADS) in the diagnostic value of thyroid nodules: a systematic review |
| Q37479137 | Training the ACRIN 6666 Investigators and effects of feedback on breast ultrasound interpretive performance and agreement in BI-RADS ultrasound feature analysis |
| Q30455153 | Triple receptor-negative breast cancer: imaging and clinical characteristics |
| Q37787656 | US of Breast Masses Categorized as BI-RADS 3, 4, and 5: Pictorial Review of Factors Influencing Clinical Management |
| Q37832991 | US-guided diffuse optical tomography for breast lesions: the reliability of clinical experience |
| Q84467090 | Ultrasonographic alterations associated with the dilatation of mammary ducts: feature analysis and BI-RADS assessment |
| Q53115121 | Ultrasound positive predictive values by BI-RADS categories 3-5 for solid masses: An independent reader study. |
| Q47222514 | Use of the Kwak Thyroid Image Reporting and Data System (K-TIRADS) in differential diagnosis of thyroid nodules: systematic review and meta-analysis |
| Q38632307 | Utility of BI-RADS Assessment Category 4 Subdivisions for Screening Breast MRI. |
| Q30372444 | Validation of the fifth edition BI-RADS ultrasound lexicon with comparison of fourth and fifth edition diagnostic performance using video clips. |
| Q37981082 | Value of the US BI-RADS final assessment following mastectomy: BI-RADS 4 and 5 lesions. |
| Q31142721 | Variability in Observer Performance Between Faculty Members and Residents Using Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS)-Ultrasound, Fifth Edition (2013). |
| Q33926221 | WITHDRAWN: Inter-observer variability in Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) ultrasound final assessments |
| Q37738830 | Which supplementary imaging modality should be used for breast ultrasonography? Comparison of the diagnostic performance of elastography and computer-aided diagnosis. |
| Q80413249 | [Elastography of the breast: a prospective study of 122 lesions] |
| Q81932663 | [US and dense breasts: where do we stand?] |
Search more.