| scholarly article | Q13442814 |
| P2093 | author name string | Joseph Millum | |
| Jerry Menikoff | |||
| P2860 | cites work | Ethical review of research involving human subjects: when and why is IRB review necessary? | Q35156679 |
| A survey of IRB process in 68 U.S. hospitals | Q35923692 | ||
| Variability in the costs of institutional review board oversight | Q36547107 | ||
| Grinding to a halt: the effects of the increasing regulatory burden on research and quality improvement efforts | Q37536032 | ||
| The dysregulation of human subjects research. | Q53169769 | ||
| Institutional review boards: a crisis in confidence | Q73438221 | ||
| Protection of human subjects: categories of research that may be reviewed by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) through an expedited review procedure--FDA. Notice | Q77203559 | ||
| P433 | issue | 10 | |
| P407 | language of work or name | English | Q1860 |
| P921 | main subject | research ethics | Q1132684 |
| ethical review | Q56515249 | ||
| ethical analysis | Q98139384 | ||
| P304 | page(s) | 655-657 | |
| P577 | publication date | 2010-11-01 | |
| 2010-11-16 | |||
| P1433 | published in | Annals of Internal Medicine | Q564416 |
| P1476 | title | Streamlining ethical review | |
| Streamlining Ethical Review | |||
| P478 | volume | 153 |
| Q38665110 | A Proposed Process for Reliably Updating the Common Rule |
| Q34020789 | A national strategy to develop pragmatic clinical trials infrastructure. |
| Q35856764 | Canada's new ethical guidelines for research with humans: a critique and comparison with the United States |
| Q30650486 | Data collection in cancer clinical trials: Too much of a good thing? |
| Q30403064 | Duration of viral shedding in hospitalized patients infected with pandemic H1N1 |
| Q35265285 | Education Research and Human Subject Protection: Crossing the IRB Quagmire |
| Q93009895 | Exempting low-risk health and medical research from ethics reviews: comparing Australia, the United Kingdom, the United States and the Netherlands |
| Q38074497 | Getting through ethics: the fit between research ethics board assessments and qualitative research |
| Q33645428 | HCV core antigen and HCV-RNA in HIV/HCV co-infected patients with different HCV genotypes |
| Q35151775 | Increasing burden of institutional review in multicenter clinical trials of infertility: the Reproductive Medicine Network experience with the Pregnancy in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PPCOS) I and II studies. |
| Q28079643 | Molecular epidemiology and genotyping of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in a cohort of young asymptomatic sexually active women (18-25 years) in Milan, Italy |
| Q37707019 | Navigating the institutional review board approval process in a multicenter observational critical care study |
| Q90744019 | Operational Characteristics of Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) in the United States |
| Q36801384 | RESEARCH ETHICS. Evidence gaps and ethical review of multicenter studies |
| Q27303838 | Research ethics committees in the regulation of clinical research: comparison of Finland to England, Canada, and the United States. |
| Q35201882 | The role of the clinical and translational science awards program in improving the quality and efficiency of clinical research |
| Q53838918 | Why Public Comments Matter: The Case of the National Institutes of Health Policy on Single Institutional Review Board Review of Multicenter Studies. |
Search more.