scholarly article | Q13442814 |
P50 | author | Robert J. Volk | Q38802794 |
Simon James Whitney | Q57626460 | ||
Amy L McGuire | Q60325193 | ||
Laurence B. McCullough | Q60327566 | ||
P2093 | author name string | Carl Schneider | |
Kirsten Alcser | |||
P2860 | cites work | Breaking the camel's back: multicenter clinical trials and local institutional review boards | Q34140535 |
Impact of institutional review board practice variation on observational health services research | Q35193591 | ||
U. S. Health Researchers Review their Ethics Review Boards: A Qualitative Study | Q37455114 | ||
Ethics and research governance in a multicentre study: add 150 days to your study protocol | Q43009570 | ||
The dysregulation of human subjects research. | Q53169769 | ||
P433 | issue | 2 | |
P407 | language of work or name | English | Q1860 |
P921 | main subject | institutional review board | Q362104 |
P304 | page(s) | 68-72 | |
P577 | publication date | 2008-04-02 | |
P1433 | published in | International Journal of Medical Sciences | Q10927439 |
P1476 | title | Principal investigator views of the IRB system | |
P478 | volume | 5 |
Q37352991 | A Study of Assessing Errors and Completeness of Research Application Forms Submitted to Instituitional Ethics Committee (IEC) of a Tertiary Care Hospital |
Q37889474 | A canadian perspective on ethics review and neuroimaging: tensions and solutions. |
Q35258768 | A domain analysis model for eIRB systems: addressing the weak link in clinical research informatics |
Q36490902 | A study to assess completeness of project application forms submitted to Institutional Ethics Committees (IEC) of a tertiary care hospital |
Q35606493 | A systematic review of the empirical literature evaluating IRBs: what we know and what we still need to learn |
Q38367993 | Analysis of research ethics board approval times in an academic department of medicine |
Q28742470 | Attitudes toward genetic research review: results from a survey of human genetics researchers |
Q35549742 | Awareness of Federal Regulatory Mechanisms Relevant to Community-Engaged Research: Survey of Health Disparities-Oriented NIH-Funded Investigators |
Q38650451 | Barriers to Effective Deliberation in Clinical Research Oversight |
Q28596203 | Can an ethics officer role reduce delays in research ethics approval? A mixed-method evaluation of an improvement project |
Q48425377 | Consent and research governance in biobanks: evidence from focus groups with medical researchers |
Q35265285 | Education Research and Human Subject Protection: Crossing the IRB Quagmire |
Q36986405 | Educational and social-ethical issues in the pursuit of molecular medicine |
Q34371282 | Ethical aspects in tissue research: thematic analysis of ethical statements to the research ethics committee |
Q38612947 | Ethics Regulation in Social Computing Research: Examining the Role of Institutional Review Boards |
Q33645906 | Ethics review as a component of institutional approval for a multicentre continuous quality improvement project: the investigator's perspective |
Q34325060 | From anonymity to "open doors": IRB responses to tensions with researchers |
Q89764722 | IRB Process Improvements: A Machine Learning Analysis |
Q38850059 | Informed Consent-Uninformed Participants: Shortcomings of Online Social Science Consent Forms and Recommendations for Improvement |
Q28084996 | Institutional Review Boards: Purpose and Challenges |
Q33828098 | Integrating a Federated Healthcare Data Query Platform With Electronic IRB Information Systems |
Q34536109 | Is your ethics committee efficient? Using "IRB Metrics" as a self-assessment tool for continuous improvement at the Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Thailand |
Q37710543 | Perspectives of Canadian researchers on ethics review of neuroimaging research |
Q46668022 | Seeking Ways to Inform the Uninformed: Improving the Informed Consent Process in Online Social Science Research. |
Q89105732 | The Real-Time IRB: A Collaborative Innovation to Decrease IRB Review Time |
Q37816430 | The research ethics committee is not the enemy: oversight of community-based participatory research. |
Q33666469 | The use of delayed telephone informed consent for observational emergency medicine research is ethical and effective |