Principal investigator views of the IRB system

scientific article published on 2 April 2008

Principal investigator views of the IRB system is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.7150/IJMS.5.68
P932PMC publication ID2288790
P698PubMed publication ID18392146

P50authorRobert J. VolkQ38802794
Simon James WhitneyQ57626460
Amy L McGuireQ60325193
Laurence B. McCulloughQ60327566
P2093author name stringCarl Schneider
Kirsten Alcser
P2860cites workBreaking the camel's back: multicenter clinical trials and local institutional review boardsQ34140535
Impact of institutional review board practice variation on observational health services researchQ35193591
U. S. Health Researchers Review their Ethics Review Boards: A Qualitative StudyQ37455114
Ethics and research governance in a multicentre study: add 150 days to your study protocolQ43009570
The dysregulation of human subjects research.Q53169769
P433issue2
P407language of work or nameEnglishQ1860
P921main subjectinstitutional review boardQ362104
P304page(s)68-72
P577publication date2008-04-02
P1433published inInternational Journal of Medical SciencesQ10927439
P1476titlePrincipal investigator views of the IRB system
P478volume5

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q37352991A Study of Assessing Errors and Completeness of Research Application Forms Submitted to Instituitional Ethics Committee (IEC) of a Tertiary Care Hospital
Q37889474A canadian perspective on ethics review and neuroimaging: tensions and solutions.
Q35258768A domain analysis model for eIRB systems: addressing the weak link in clinical research informatics
Q36490902A study to assess completeness of project application forms submitted to Institutional Ethics Committees (IEC) of a tertiary care hospital
Q35606493A systematic review of the empirical literature evaluating IRBs: what we know and what we still need to learn
Q38367993Analysis of research ethics board approval times in an academic department of medicine
Q28742470Attitudes toward genetic research review: results from a survey of human genetics researchers
Q35549742Awareness of Federal Regulatory Mechanisms Relevant to Community-Engaged Research: Survey of Health Disparities-Oriented NIH-Funded Investigators
Q38650451Barriers to Effective Deliberation in Clinical Research Oversight
Q28596203Can an ethics officer role reduce delays in research ethics approval? A mixed-method evaluation of an improvement project
Q48425377Consent and research governance in biobanks: evidence from focus groups with medical researchers
Q35265285Education Research and Human Subject Protection: Crossing the IRB Quagmire
Q36986405Educational and social-ethical issues in the pursuit of molecular medicine
Q34371282Ethical aspects in tissue research: thematic analysis of ethical statements to the research ethics committee
Q38612947Ethics Regulation in Social Computing Research: Examining the Role of Institutional Review Boards
Q33645906Ethics review as a component of institutional approval for a multicentre continuous quality improvement project: the investigator's perspective
Q34325060From anonymity to "open doors": IRB responses to tensions with researchers
Q89764722IRB Process Improvements: A Machine Learning Analysis
Q38850059Informed Consent-Uninformed Participants: Shortcomings of Online Social Science Consent Forms and Recommendations for Improvement
Q28084996Institutional Review Boards: Purpose and Challenges
Q33828098Integrating a Federated Healthcare Data Query Platform With Electronic IRB Information Systems
Q34536109Is your ethics committee efficient? Using "IRB Metrics" as a self-assessment tool for continuous improvement at the Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Thailand
Q37710543Perspectives of Canadian researchers on ethics review of neuroimaging research
Q46668022Seeking Ways to Inform the Uninformed: Improving the Informed Consent Process in Online Social Science Research.
Q89105732The Real-Time IRB: A Collaborative Innovation to Decrease IRB Review Time
Q37816430The research ethics committee is not the enemy: oversight of community-based participatory research.
Q33666469The use of delayed telephone informed consent for observational emergency medicine research is ethical and effective