Are research ethics committees behaving unethically? Some suggestions for improving performance and accountability

scientific article published on November 1996

Are research ethics committees behaving unethically? Some suggestions for improving performance and accountability is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1136/BMJ.313.7069.1390
P932PMC publication ID2352884
P698PubMed publication ID8956711
P5875ResearchGate publication ID14250356

P50authorJulian SavulescuQ1712057
P2093author name stringChalmers I
Blunt J
P2860cites workScientific misconduct in investigational drug trialsQ39857260
Cumulative meta-analysis of clinical trials builds evidence for exemplary medical care.Q40590984
Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. A meta-analysisQ40663320
The science of reviewing researchQ40756630
Clinical trials: two neglected ethical issuesQ40814743
Cumulative meta-analysis of therapeutic trials for myocardial infarctionQ41112231
Medical investigators' views about ethics and fraud in medical researchQ41144842
How to get patients' consent to enter clinical trials. Reports of trials should state proportion of people who refuse to participateQ42761697
Misleading meta-analysisQ42841765
Comparing treatmentsQ42856051
Handling scientific fraud. Prospective registration of health care research would help.Q42872113
Local research ethics committeesQ42913719
Publishing research supported by the tobacco industryQ43186265
Is publication bias a medical problem?Q52882936
The use of placebo controls.Q53649537
Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. A concern for standards;Q56880347
Publication biasQ56880353
Why register clinical trials?--RevisitedQ67488511
Users' guides to the medical literature. I. How to get started. The Evidence-Based Medicine Working GroupQ70508972
A Survey of Clinical Trials of Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Colon Surgery: Evidence against Further Use of No-Treatment ControlsQ70884262
The Cochrane Collaboration and evidence-based medicineQ71945675
Publication biasQ72235492
From the National Institutes of HealthQ72472590
Active and Passive EuthanasiaQ28138649
The continuing unethical use of placebo controlsQ28244803
Reference bias in reports of drug trialsQ28290702
Whose data are they anyway?Q28754781
Publication bias in clinical researchQ29541186
The role of data audits in detecting scientific misconduct. Results of the FDA programQ31067481
Piloting short workshops on the critical appraisal of reviewsQ33572788
Assessing the scientific quality of review articlesQ33701746
Equipoise and the ethics of clinical researchQ34050273
The medical review article: state of the scienceQ34191468
Monitoring clinical research: an obligation unfulfilledQ34279586
The relationship between methodological quality and conclusions in reviews of spinal manipulationQ34372258
Scientific value and validity as ethical requirements for research: a proposed explicationQ34410480
Protecting and promoting the human research subject: a review of the function of research ethics boards in Canadian faculties of medicine.Q34411805
Diversity in the practice of district ethics committeesQ35719369
A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarctionQ35879688
Registration of drugs for treating cancer and HIV infection: a plea to carry out phase 3 trials before admission to the marketQ36903606
Publication: an ethical imperativeQ36903616
Ethics approval for a national postal survey: recent experienceQ36905812
Cross district comparison of applications to research ethics committeesQ36905814
Ethics committees: impediments to research or guardians of ethical standards?Q36905821
Underreporting research is scientific misconductQ38050046
Publication bias: the case for an international registry of clinical trialsQ39795619
P433issue7069
P407language of work or nameEnglishQ1860
P921main subjectresearch ethicsQ1132684
ethics committeeQ59057226
P304page(s)1390-1393
P577publication date1996-11-01
P1433published inThe BMJQ546003
P1476titleAre research ethics committees behaving unethically? Some suggestions for improving performance and accountability
P478volume313

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q34127448A rational approach to the control of postoperative nausea and vomiting: evidence from systematic reviews. Part II. Recommendations for prevention and treatment, and research agenda
Q42949141An amnesty for unpublished trials.
Q30202199Are Research Ethics Committees Prepared for Community-Based Participatory Research?
Q24288882Barriers to and facilitators of interventions to counter publication bias: thematic analysis of scholarly articles and stakeholder interviews.
Q30369879Bioethics: why philosophy is essential for progress.
Q24614627CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
Q36505148Concept paper: a virtual centralized IRB system
Q51037930Conflict of interest and medical publication.
Q63479419Consent in emergency care research – Authors' reply
Q52902862Dealing with publication bias.
Q24800828Equipoise, design bias, and randomized controlled trials: the elusive ethics of new drug development
Q58258174Ethical Challenges of Simulation-Driven Big Neuroscience
Q34991646Ethical review of health service research in the UK: implications for nursing.
Q33805642Ethics behind closed doors: do research ethics committees need secrecy?
Q34525561Ethics in exercise science research
Q58665890Ethics on the floor
Q56699186Ethics that exclude: the role of ethics committees in lesbian and gay health research in South Africa
Q42345806Evidence-based medicine: worship of form and treatment of high blood pressure
Q41727273Evidence-based pediatric pulmonary medicine: how can it help?
Q46870051From Mexico to Mali: four years in the history of clinical trial registration
Q78171131How can medical journals help prevent poor medical research? Some opportunities presented by electronic publishing
Q37600993How to apply for research grants in allergology
Q24246144Impact of shared scientific or ethical review of multicentre clinical research on the quality of clinical research and the clinical research process
Q24250147Impact of shared scientific or ethical review of multicentre clinical research on the quality of clinical research and the clinical research process
Q47870601Improving access to medicines: empowering patients in the quest to improve treatment for rare lethal diseases
Q28657841Increasing value and reducing waste in biomedical research regulation and management
Q28611347Increasing value and reducing waste: addressing inaccessible research
Q34532560Judging the ethics of qualitative research: considering the "ethics as process" model
Q58668211Lessons for research ethics committees
Q55109726Magnetresonanztomographie
Q44628250Many more reasons behind difficulties in recruiting patients to randomized controlled trials in psychiatry
Q94085621Medical Editors Trial Amnesty
Q45971192Medical Editors Trial Amnesty (META).
Q52901231Medical Editors Trial Amnesty.
Q55714562Medical Editors' Trial Amnesty
Q73699527Medical editors trial amnesty
Q33764165Meta-analysis of short-term low dose prednisolone versus placebo and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in rheumatoid arthritis
Q93609400Meta: Medical Editors Trial Amnesty (META)
Q34925500New governance arrangements for research ethics committees: is facilitating research achieved at the cost of participants' interest
Q92356055Publication and non-publication of clinical trials in PTSD: an overview
Q35887485Publication of clinical trials: accountability and accessibility
Q38989858Randomised placebo-controlled trials of surgery: ethical analysis and guidelines
Q36309916Randomized controlled trials of aprotinin in cardiac surgery: could clinical equipoise have stopped the bleeding?
Q33799261Registering clinical trials
Q46388655Registration of unpublished trials: a call to authors
Q34871708Research ethics committees and public dissemination of clinical trial results
Q24815381Research ethics committees: agents of research policy?
Q34595627Research protocols: waiving confidentiality for the greater good
Q50158857Research, ethics and privacy: the limits of knowledge
Q26827210Sample size determinations in original research protocols for randomised clinical trials submitted to UK research ethics committees: review
Q24244768Short-term low-dose corticosteroids vs placebo and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs in rheumatoid arthritis
Q30992545Short-term low-dose corticosteroids vs placebo and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs in rheumatoid arthritis.
Q74350598Standards of efficacy for evaluation of treatment outcomes in urinary incontinence: recommendations of the Urodynamic Society
Q64955317Systematic reviews in cystic fibrosis.
Q50108573The Practice of Research Ethics in Lebanon and Qatar: Perspectives of Researchers on Informed Consent
Q53537921The impact of local research ethics committees on the development of nursing knowledge.
Q57343201The role for pragmatic randomized controlled trials (pRCTs) in comparative effectiveness research
Q53392860Under-reporting of clinical trials is unethical.
Q37103201Using health technology assessment to identify research gaps: an unexploited resource for increasing the value of clinical research.
Q34271206Variation in institutional review board responses to a standard protocol for a multicenter clinical trial
Q33792013When placebo controlled trials are essential and equivalence trials are inadequate
Q28732492Why we need easy access to all data from all clinical trials and how to accomplish it

Search more.