scholarly article | Q13442814 |
P50 | author | Julian Savulescu | Q1712057 |
P2093 | author name string | Chalmers I | |
Blunt J | |||
P2860 | cites work | Scientific misconduct in investigational drug trials | Q39857260 |
Cumulative meta-analysis of clinical trials builds evidence for exemplary medical care. | Q40590984 | ||
Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. A meta-analysis | Q40663320 | ||
The science of reviewing research | Q40756630 | ||
Clinical trials: two neglected ethical issues | Q40814743 | ||
Cumulative meta-analysis of therapeutic trials for myocardial infarction | Q41112231 | ||
Medical investigators' views about ethics and fraud in medical research | Q41144842 | ||
How to get patients' consent to enter clinical trials. Reports of trials should state proportion of people who refuse to participate | Q42761697 | ||
Misleading meta-analysis | Q42841765 | ||
Comparing treatments | Q42856051 | ||
Handling scientific fraud. Prospective registration of health care research would help. | Q42872113 | ||
Local research ethics committees | Q42913719 | ||
Publishing research supported by the tobacco industry | Q43186265 | ||
Is publication bias a medical problem? | Q52882936 | ||
The use of placebo controls. | Q53649537 | ||
Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. A concern for standards; | Q56880347 | ||
Publication bias | Q56880353 | ||
Why register clinical trials?--Revisited | Q67488511 | ||
Users' guides to the medical literature. I. How to get started. The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group | Q70508972 | ||
A Survey of Clinical Trials of Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Colon Surgery: Evidence against Further Use of No-Treatment Controls | Q70884262 | ||
The Cochrane Collaboration and evidence-based medicine | Q71945675 | ||
Publication bias | Q72235492 | ||
From the National Institutes of Health | Q72472590 | ||
Active and Passive Euthanasia | Q28138649 | ||
The continuing unethical use of placebo controls | Q28244803 | ||
Reference bias in reports of drug trials | Q28290702 | ||
Whose data are they anyway? | Q28754781 | ||
Publication bias in clinical research | Q29541186 | ||
The role of data audits in detecting scientific misconduct. Results of the FDA program | Q31067481 | ||
Piloting short workshops on the critical appraisal of reviews | Q33572788 | ||
Assessing the scientific quality of review articles | Q33701746 | ||
Equipoise and the ethics of clinical research | Q34050273 | ||
The medical review article: state of the science | Q34191468 | ||
Monitoring clinical research: an obligation unfulfilled | Q34279586 | ||
The relationship between methodological quality and conclusions in reviews of spinal manipulation | Q34372258 | ||
Scientific value and validity as ethical requirements for research: a proposed explication | Q34410480 | ||
Protecting and promoting the human research subject: a review of the function of research ethics boards in Canadian faculties of medicine. | Q34411805 | ||
Diversity in the practice of district ethics committees | Q35719369 | ||
A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction | Q35879688 | ||
Registration of drugs for treating cancer and HIV infection: a plea to carry out phase 3 trials before admission to the market | Q36903606 | ||
Publication: an ethical imperative | Q36903616 | ||
Ethics approval for a national postal survey: recent experience | Q36905812 | ||
Cross district comparison of applications to research ethics committees | Q36905814 | ||
Ethics committees: impediments to research or guardians of ethical standards? | Q36905821 | ||
Underreporting research is scientific misconduct | Q38050046 | ||
Publication bias: the case for an international registry of clinical trials | Q39795619 | ||
P433 | issue | 7069 | |
P407 | language of work or name | English | Q1860 |
P921 | main subject | research ethics | Q1132684 |
ethics committee | Q59057226 | ||
P304 | page(s) | 1390-1393 | |
P577 | publication date | 1996-11-01 | |
P1433 | published in | The BMJ | Q546003 |
P1476 | title | Are research ethics committees behaving unethically? Some suggestions for improving performance and accountability | |
P478 | volume | 313 |
Q34127448 | A rational approach to the control of postoperative nausea and vomiting: evidence from systematic reviews. Part II. Recommendations for prevention and treatment, and research agenda |
Q42949141 | An amnesty for unpublished trials. |
Q30202199 | Are Research Ethics Committees Prepared for Community-Based Participatory Research? |
Q24288882 | Barriers to and facilitators of interventions to counter publication bias: thematic analysis of scholarly articles and stakeholder interviews. |
Q30369879 | Bioethics: why philosophy is essential for progress. |
Q24614627 | CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials |
Q36505148 | Concept paper: a virtual centralized IRB system |
Q51037930 | Conflict of interest and medical publication. |
Q63479419 | Consent in emergency care research – Authors' reply |
Q52902862 | Dealing with publication bias. |
Q24800828 | Equipoise, design bias, and randomized controlled trials: the elusive ethics of new drug development |
Q58258174 | Ethical Challenges of Simulation-Driven Big Neuroscience |
Q34991646 | Ethical review of health service research in the UK: implications for nursing. |
Q33805642 | Ethics behind closed doors: do research ethics committees need secrecy? |
Q34525561 | Ethics in exercise science research |
Q58665890 | Ethics on the floor |
Q56699186 | Ethics that exclude: the role of ethics committees in lesbian and gay health research in South Africa |
Q42345806 | Evidence-based medicine: worship of form and treatment of high blood pressure |
Q41727273 | Evidence-based pediatric pulmonary medicine: how can it help? |
Q46870051 | From Mexico to Mali: four years in the history of clinical trial registration |
Q78171131 | How can medical journals help prevent poor medical research? Some opportunities presented by electronic publishing |
Q37600993 | How to apply for research grants in allergology |
Q24246144 | Impact of shared scientific or ethical review of multicentre clinical research on the quality of clinical research and the clinical research process |
Q24250147 | Impact of shared scientific or ethical review of multicentre clinical research on the quality of clinical research and the clinical research process |
Q47870601 | Improving access to medicines: empowering patients in the quest to improve treatment for rare lethal diseases |
Q28657841 | Increasing value and reducing waste in biomedical research regulation and management |
Q28611347 | Increasing value and reducing waste: addressing inaccessible research |
Q34532560 | Judging the ethics of qualitative research: considering the "ethics as process" model |
Q58668211 | Lessons for research ethics committees |
Q55109726 | Magnetresonanztomographie |
Q44628250 | Many more reasons behind difficulties in recruiting patients to randomized controlled trials in psychiatry |
Q94085621 | Medical Editors Trial Amnesty |
Q45971192 | Medical Editors Trial Amnesty (META). |
Q52901231 | Medical Editors Trial Amnesty. |
Q55714562 | Medical Editors' Trial Amnesty |
Q73699527 | Medical editors trial amnesty |
Q33764165 | Meta-analysis of short-term low dose prednisolone versus placebo and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in rheumatoid arthritis |
Q93609400 | Meta: Medical Editors Trial Amnesty (META) |
Q34925500 | New governance arrangements for research ethics committees: is facilitating research achieved at the cost of participants' interest |
Q92356055 | Publication and non-publication of clinical trials in PTSD: an overview |
Q35887485 | Publication of clinical trials: accountability and accessibility |
Q38989858 | Randomised placebo-controlled trials of surgery: ethical analysis and guidelines |
Q36309916 | Randomized controlled trials of aprotinin in cardiac surgery: could clinical equipoise have stopped the bleeding? |
Q33799261 | Registering clinical trials |
Q46388655 | Registration of unpublished trials: a call to authors |
Q34871708 | Research ethics committees and public dissemination of clinical trial results |
Q24815381 | Research ethics committees: agents of research policy? |
Q34595627 | Research protocols: waiving confidentiality for the greater good |
Q50158857 | Research, ethics and privacy: the limits of knowledge |
Q26827210 | Sample size determinations in original research protocols for randomised clinical trials submitted to UK research ethics committees: review |
Q24244768 | Short-term low-dose corticosteroids vs placebo and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs in rheumatoid arthritis |
Q30992545 | Short-term low-dose corticosteroids vs placebo and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs in rheumatoid arthritis. |
Q74350598 | Standards of efficacy for evaluation of treatment outcomes in urinary incontinence: recommendations of the Urodynamic Society |
Q64955317 | Systematic reviews in cystic fibrosis. |
Q50108573 | The Practice of Research Ethics in Lebanon and Qatar: Perspectives of Researchers on Informed Consent |
Q53537921 | The impact of local research ethics committees on the development of nursing knowledge. |
Q57343201 | The role for pragmatic randomized controlled trials (pRCTs) in comparative effectiveness research |
Q53392860 | Under-reporting of clinical trials is unethical. |
Q37103201 | Using health technology assessment to identify research gaps: an unexploited resource for increasing the value of clinical research. |
Q34271206 | Variation in institutional review board responses to a standard protocol for a multicenter clinical trial |
Q33792013 | When placebo controlled trials are essential and equivalence trials are inadequate |
Q28732492 | Why we need easy access to all data from all clinical trials and how to accomplish it |
Search more.