Colorectal cancer prevention: Perspectives of key players from social networks in a low-income rural US region

scientific article published on 22 February 2016

Colorectal cancer prevention: Perspectives of key players from social networks in a low-income rural US region is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.3402/QHW.V11.30396
P932PMC publication ID4764956
P698PubMed publication ID26905402
P5875ResearchGate publication ID295687341

P2093author name stringMira L Katz
Nancy E Schoenberg
Christina R Studts
Claire Snell-Rood
Adam Jonas
Benjamin Broder-Oldach
Kathryn Eddens
P2860cites workThe collective dynamics of smoking in a large social networkQ24647437
Evidence based cardiology: psychosocial factors in the aetiology and prognosis of coronary heart disease. Systematic review of prospective cohort studiesQ28144748
Health and social cohesion: why care about income inequality?Q28235705
Three approaches to qualitative content analysisQ29619566
The association between social networks and colorectal cancer screening in American males and females: data from the 2005 Health Information National Trends SurveyQ33427463
Use of focus group data to develop recommendations for demographically segmented colorectal cancer educational strategiesQ33435192
Barriers to colorectal cancer screening among women in rural central Pennsylvania: primary care physicians' perspectiveQ33728706
Influence of provider discussion and specific recommendation on colorectal cancer screening uptake among U.S. adultsQ34204665
Appalachian women's perceptions of their community's health threats.Q34515379
Trends in colorectal cancer test use among vulnerable populations in the United StatesQ35156806
Disparities in underserved white populations: the case of cancer-related disparities in AppalachiaQ35584702
Social and cultural factors influencing health in southern West Virginia: a qualitative studyQ35605377
Community strategies to address cancer disparities in Appalachian KentuckyQ35683464
Interventions to promote colorectal cancer screening: an integrative reviewQ36004087
A qualitative analysis of couples' communication regarding colorectal cancer screening using the Interdependence ModelQ36111615
E-mail to Promote Colorectal Cancer Screening Within Social Networks: Acceptability and ContentQ36771035
Identifying opinion leaders to promote behavior changeQ36865511
Evolution of diffusion and dissemination theory.Q37089657
Validation of self-reported colorectal cancer screening behaviors among Appalachian residentsQ37257428
Social support and cancer screening among older black AmericansQ39414098
Network-related mechanisms may help explain long-term HIV-1 seroprevalence levels that remain high but do not approach population-group saturationQ39552765
Using Concept Mapping to Explore Barriers and Facilitators to Breast Cancer Screening in Formerly Homeless Women with Serious Mental IllnessQ40592759
Cervical cancer screening: exploring Appalachian patients' barriers to follow-up careQ41723618
Physician-community health worker partnering to support diabetes self-management in primary careQ42752464
Cognitive mediators linking social support networks to colorectal cancer screening adherenceQ44026513
Patterns of colorectal cancer screening uptake among men and women in the United StatesQ50116113
Dietary energy density is associated with obesity and the metabolic syndrome in U.S. adults.Q51480570
Southern Appalachia: analytical models, social services, and native support systems.Q52077451
Navigating the murky waters of colorectal cancer screening and health reform.Q55618016
Social Capital in the Creation of Human CapitalQ56082235
Toward wellness: Women seeking health informationQ56566586
P407language of work or nameEnglishQ1860
P921main subjectcolorectal cancerQ188874
colorectal carcinomaQ25493920
P304page(s)30396
P577publication date2016-02-22
P1433published inInternational Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-beingQ26853942
P1476titleColorectal cancer prevention: Perspectives of key players from social networks in a low-income rural US region
P478volume11

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q47635308"Finding the Right FIT": Rural Patient Preferences for Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) Characteristics
Q40446894A randomized controlled trial of a multicomponent, targeted, low-literacy educational intervention compared with a nontargeted intervention to boost colorectal cancer screening with fecal immunochemical testing in community clinics.
Q36412882An Interactive, Mobile-Based Tool for Personal Social Network Data Collection and Visualization Among a Geographically Isolated and Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Population: Early-Stage Feasibility Study With Qualitative User Feedback
Q88141223Barriers and Facilitators to Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Rural Women in Community Clinics by Heath Literacy
Q58764688How Social Networks May Influence Cancer Patients' Situated Identity and Illness-Related Behaviors
Q38607294Investigating Factors Associated with FOBT Screening for Colorectal Cancer Based on the Components of Health Belief Model and Social Support
Q33915175Social networks as predictors of colorectal cancer screening in African Americans
Q58604556The Effect of Educational Intervention Based on Health Belief Model and Social Support on the Rate of Participation of Individuals in Performing Fecal Occult Blood Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening

Search more.