Analysis sans frontières: can we ever make economic evaluations generalisable across jurisdictions?

scientific article published on January 2006

Analysis sans frontières: can we ever make economic evaluations generalisable across jurisdictions? is …
instance of (P31):
review articleQ7318358
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P6179Dimensions Publication ID1028989702
P356DOI10.2165/00019053-200624110-00006
P698PubMed publication ID17067194

P2093author name stringMark J Sculpher
Michael F Drummond
P2860cites workEstablishing the cost-effectiveness of new pharmaceuticals under conditions of uncertainty--when is there sufficient evidence?Q81037141
The use of probabilistic decision models in technology assessment : the case of total hip replacementQ81385375
National Institute for Clinical Excellence and its value judgmentsQ24562214
Assessing the appropriateness of combining economic data from multinational clinical trialsQ30802399
Using multilevel models for assessing the variability of multinational resource use and cost data.Q30961875
Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves--facts, fallacies and frequently asked questionsQ31058011
'Lost in translation': accounting for between-country differences in the analysis of multinational cost-effectiveness dataQ33261643
Health economic guidelines--similarities, differences and some implicationsQ34436165
Generalisability in economic evaluation studies in healthcare: a review and case studies.Q35950554
Bayesian methods for evidence synthesis in cost-effectiveness analysisQ36381197
Using value of information analysis to prioritise health research: some lessons from recent UK experienceQ36635492
Whither trial-based economic evaluation for health care decision making?Q40349299
A rational framework for decision making by the National Institute For Clinical Excellence (NICE).Q40632683
Research into the use of health economics in decision making in the United Kingdom--Phase II. Is health economics 'for good or evil'?Q40811826
Cost effectiveness of thrombolytic therapy with tissue plasminogen activator as compared with streptokinase for acute myocardial infarctionQ40985280
Country specific cost comparisons from multinational clinical trials using empirical Bayesian shrinkage estimation: the Canadian ASSENT-3 economic analysisQ45247322
Estimating country-specific cost-effectiveness from multinational clinical trialsQ47744065
Cost-effectiveness analysis for multinational clinical trialsQ50133311
Formulary submission guidelines for Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Colorado and Nevada. Structure, application and manufacturer responsibilities.Q50515872
Are the WOSCOPS clinical and economic findings generalizable to other populations? A case study for Belgium. The WOSCOPS Economic Analysis Group. West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study.Q52072478
Management of non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: how cost-effective are glycoprotein IIb/IIIA antagonists in the UK National Health Service?Q56458776
Probabilistic sensitivity analysis for NICE technology assessment: not an optional extraQ61856226
Analyzing differences in the costs of treatment across centers within economic evaluations.Q64904384
The irrelevance of inference: a decision-making approach to the stochastic evaluation of health care technologiesQ73122940
Assessing generalisability by location in trial-based cost-effectiveness analysis: the use of multilevel modelsQ80603253
P433issue11
P304page(s)1087-1099
P577publication date2006-01-01
P1433published inPharmacoEconomicsQ7180778
P1476titleAnalysis sans frontières: can we ever make economic evaluations generalisable across jurisdictions?
P478volume24

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q35820527A Time-Trend Economic Analysis of Cancer Drug Trials
Q38074914A systematic and critical review of the evolving methods and applications of value of information in academia and practice.
Q48583320A systematic review of pharmacoeconomic guidelines
Q37627235Barriers to generalizability of health economic evaluations in Latin America and the Caribbean region
Q79304976Better analysis for better decisions: facing up to the challenges
Q30491297Can economic evaluation in telemedicine be trusted? A systematic review of the literature
Q33955955Cost-analysis of XELOX and FOLFOX4 for treatment of colorectal cancer to assist decision-making on reimbursement.
Q38153807Economic evaluations in European reimbursement submission guidelines: current status and comparisons.
Q39614547Health technology assessment in Poland and Scotland: comparison of process and decisions
Q38068886Incorporating considerations of cost-effectiveness, affordability, and resource implications in guideline development: article 6 in Integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report
Q81581696Key principles for the improved conduct of health technology assessments for resource allocation decisions
Q82459574Methodological quality of economic evaluations of new pharmaceuticals in The Netherlands
Q33772852Principles of pharmacoeconomics and their impact on strategic imperatives of pharmaceutical research and development
Q37588121Probabilistic cost-minimisation analysis of darbepoetin alpha versus epoetin alpha in treating anaemia secondary to chronic renal failure. Assessment in Spanish clinical practice.
Q34804377Reimbursement of pharmaceuticals: reference pricing versus health technology assessment
Q30382232Self-measurement of blood glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes: a health economic assessment
Q37451168Systematic reviews of economic evaluations: utility or futility?
Q36490234The use of cost-effectiveness analysis for pediatric immunization in developing countries
Q51157350[Drug treatment of cystic fibrosis - cost patterns and savings potential for outpatient treatment].

Search more.