scholarly article | Q13442814 |
P2093 | author name string | Daniel Grossman | |
Joseph E Potter | |||
Kari White | |||
Kristine Hopkins | |||
Abigail R A Aiken | |||
Amanda Jean Stevenson | |||
Celia Hubert | |||
P2860 | cites work | Unmet demand for highly effective postpartum contraception in Texas | Q34395311 |
Return on investment: a fuller assessment of the benefits and cost savings of the US publicly funded family planning program | Q34700425 | ||
Frustrated demand for sterilization among low-income Latinas in El Paso, Texas | Q35529203 | ||
Cutting family planning in Texas. | Q35565729 | ||
Medicaid policy on sterilization--anachronistic or still relevant? | Q35565888 | ||
Factors influencing uptake of intrauterine devices among postpartum adolescents: a qualitative study | Q35612912 | ||
Contraception after delivery and short interpregnancy intervals among women in the United States | Q35646942 | ||
Contraceptive counseling and postpartum contraceptive use. | Q35750693 | ||
Barriers to intrauterine device insertion in postpartum women | Q36322379 | ||
Postpartum contraceptive choices among ethnically diverse women in New Mexico | Q36739402 | ||
Short interpregnancy intervals in the United States | Q37111990 | ||
Variation in postpartum contraceptive method use: results from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) | Q37403060 | ||
One-Year Follow-up of Women With Unfulfilled Postpartum Sterilization Requests | Q37802147 | ||
Global fee prohibits postpartum provision of the most effective reversible contraceptives | Q42921676 | ||
Contraceptive continuation in Hispanic women | Q44291289 | ||
Postpartum intrauterine device insertion and postpartum tubal sterilization in the United States | Q45695316 | ||
Interpregnancy intervals: impact of postpartum contraceptive effectiveness and coverage | Q46046776 | ||
Postpartum contraception in publicly-funded programs and interpregnancy intervals | Q46048388 | ||
Advocating for immediate postpartum LARC: increasing access, improving outcomes, and decreasing cost. | Q53477551 | ||
Shifts in intended and unintended pregnancies in the United States, 2001-2008. | Q54417497 | ||
The cost of unintended pregnancy in the United States. | Q55043239 | ||
The impact of reproductive health legislation on family planning clinic services in Texas | Q58292604 | ||
Rapid repeat pregnancy in adolescents: do immediate postpartum contraceptive implants make a difference? | Q60619799 | ||
Postpartum contraception: optimizing interpregnancy intervals | Q62027598 | ||
Expanded state-funded family planning services: estimating pregnancies averted by the Family PACT Program in California, 1997-1998 | Q80396224 | ||
Cost savings from the provision of specific methods of contraception in a publicly funded program | Q81784427 | ||
Birth spacing and risk of adverse perinatal outcomes: a meta-analysis | Q83170489 | ||
P433 | issue | 2 | |
P407 | language of work or name | English | Q1860 |
P921 | main subject | birth control | Q122224 |
P304 | page(s) | 289-296 | |
P577 | publication date | 2016-02-01 | |
P1433 | published in | Obstetrics and Gynecology | Q7075543 |
P1476 | title | Barriers to Postpartum Contraception in Texas and Pregnancy Within 2 Years of Delivery | |
P478 | volume | 127 |
Q92820766 | A Novel Approach to Postpartum Contraception Provision Combined with Infant Care: A Randomized, Controlled Trial |
Q46416569 | Contraception After Delivery Among Publicly Insured Women in Texas: Use Compared With Preference |
Q48658605 | Contraceptive method preferences and provision after termination of pregnancy: a population-based analysis of women obtaining care with the British Pregnancy Advisory Service |
Q90207526 | Low-Income Texas Women's Experiences Accessing Their Desired Contraceptive Method at the First Postpartum Visit |
Q104479018 | Patients' Experiences with an Immediate Postpartum Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Program |
Q38701878 | Prevalence and Predictors of Prenatal and Postpartum Contraceptive Counseling in Two Texas Cities |
Q55258013 | Recent developments have made female permanent contraception an increasingly attractive option, and pregnant women in particular ought to be counselled about it. |
Q38836325 | Short Interpregnancy Intervals: Results from the First Baby Study |
Q50187138 | Unmet demand for short-acting hormonal and long-acting reversible contraception among community college students in Texas. |
Q89864682 | Women's Postabortion Contraceptive Preferences and Access to Family Planning Services in Mississippi |